Moderation Questions
The last iteration of the moderation discussion thread was a complete disaster. Numerous attempts to keep it on topic failed, and it became a general discussion thread with almost no moderation related posts at all. And those that were posted were so buried in non-mod posts that it became a huge time drain on the mods to sort through them. Then, when off topic posts were deleted posters complained about that.
This led to the closing of the mod discussion thread, replaced by the post report/pm approach. This has filtered out lots of noise, but has resulted at times in the General Discussion Thread turning into a quasi-mod thread. This is not desirable, but going back to the old mod thread is also not a workable option.
Therefore, I have created this new moderation thread, but with a different purpose and ground rules than previous mod threads. The purpose of this thread is to provide a place for posters to pose questions to the mods about how policies are applied; to bring to the mods attention posts they think are inappropriate and reach the level of requiring mod action; and for mods to communicate to posters things like changes or clarifications to policies, bannings, etc.
Now let me tell you what this thread is NOT a place for. It is not for nonmoderation related posts, even if the discussion originates from a comment in in a mod related post. It is not for posters to post their opinions about other posters or whether a poster should be banned. It is not to rehash past grievances about mod decisions from months or years ago. The focus of this thread will be recent posts that require action now. Or questions about current policies and enforcement.
So basically, this is a thread to ask mods questions. Which means, pretty much that only mods should be answering those questions. If a poster asks why a particular post was deleted or allowed, only a mod can answer that. Everyone else who wants to jump in with their opinion or their mod war story needs to stay out of it. It just increases the noise to signal ratio and does nothing to answer the question.
Everyone needs to understand that this thread has very different rules than the old mod thread and any other thread. Any non-moderation post will be deleted on sight. Not moved to the appropriate thread, just deleted. So don't waste your time crafting a masterpiece post about wars or transgender issues or the presidential election and then post it in this thread. It will be gone. Also, this isnt a thread for general commentary about our mods performance. Posting "browser sucks as a mod" or any such posts that don't actually ask about a policy or request a mod action will be deleted. Everyone is entitled to their opinion about the moderation of this forum. But this thread isnt for complaining about mods. You are free to go to the ATF forum and make your concerns about modding in this forum there.
So with that intro, this thread is open for those who need to bring questions about mod policies or bring inappropriate posts to the mods attention. Again, it is NOT a thread for group discussions about other posters or for other posters to answer questions directed to mods.
We'll see how this goes. If you have what you feel is an open issue raised in the General Discussion Thread, please copy that post or otherwise reintroduce the issue here.
Thanks.
Whatever you do in this thread, don’t mention the war.
I prefer to call him 2CV because that’s all the grunt he has up top.
Also it’s a tad less racist.
Which mods are the least racist and which are the most?
It was a frequency error. Which I am told, is not an error at all. Spoiler: if you play RPS vs perfect basic strategy, and you throw rock 100%, you break even.
only if oppo is dumb as your rock and play gto instead of counter strat.
but ye unfortunately in mixed strat Nash equilibria whatever strat has more than 0% picking you can play up to 100% and it doesn't matter vs the NE player
I'll take your silence as a resounding "no". Come back to me when you figure out what to do with the king. When you figure out what to do with the queen, I might actually start to respect you. No promises.
if the always checking player plays gto, you can do what you want with the q and it doesn't matter. if he folds the k more than gto you maximize always betting the q, and viceversa.
k always has to check and a to bet ofc.
I don't understand why we need to talk about this though which was why I didn't answer to begin with
if the always checking player plays gto, you can do what you want with the q and it doesn't matter. if he folds the k more than gto you maximize always betting the q, and viceversa.
k always has to check and a to bet ofc.
I don't understand why we need to talk about this though which was why I didn't answer to begin with
Q bets 1/3 of the time. I was testing you. You failed. Even Sklansky, who is a renowned ******, knows this.
What is also interesting is how condescending you were when you discussed ****ing your wife. No offence man, but your wife probably fingers herself thinking about me, not you.
My first act as a moderator will be to ban anyone who spoilers Eurovision, so help me god
BRB in an hour or so
that requires respect. most people here, and especially the people in charge, have shown they have absolutely no respect for non-mainstream USA points of view. so it would be insulting if they asked for something like that from the people they ban.
This is such a ridiculous lie. There are non-mainstream opinions voiced here every single day. People just don't have respect for when the same opinions are presented over and over again, only with different insults.
its not a lie. its my perspective. it could be wrong (lol I am never wrong about this stuff) but its not a lie. in fact its impossible for it to be a lie.
its not a lie. its my perspective. it could be wrong (lol I am never wrong about this stuff) but its not a lie. in fact its impossible for it to be a lie.
The fact that you haven't been perma'ed yet proves that views counter to mainstream American views are more than tolerated.