2p2 data breach/security exploit
Still not sure where the correct place should be but was recommended to post here:
You think no one here thinks you're lying when you claim you're not mentally ill? Now that might be a hotter take than the other stuff you're talking about.
You literally admitted to everyone that you REFUSE to remove a team of OBVIOUS scammers from NVG.
What do you think the players would think of this if they found out?
You literally admitted to everyone that you REFUSE to remove a team of OBVIOUS scammers from NVG.
What do you think the players would think of this if they found out?
Well I hope we'll find out when you let them know about it!
Feel free to shout it from the rooftops, might be perfect for X/Twitter or maybe you even start your own church or something?
That every single piece of our meta data from every single piece of poker software we touched was crosslinked through this community by the PSFTCIAFBIDOJ.
That the ENTIRE industry was a backdoored honey pot connected through 2p2
It was mathematically obvious you see? Once I had the nash equilibrium in possession
[QUOTE=Ideal Poker by Soaker Patoshi]So I see the entire privately raked community as in a weak sense comparable to the “PSFTCIAFBIDOJ " because of the support of both parties for a certain “lack of transparency" relating to the functions of poker sites as seen by the players. And for both of them it can be said that they tend to think in terms of sites operating in a benevolent fashion that is, however, beyond the comprehension of the player of the raked sites. And this parallel makes it seem not implausible that a process of poker revolution might lead to the expectation on the part of players in the “great game types" that they should be better situated to be able to understand whatever will be the rake policies which, indeed, are typically of great importance to players who may have alternative options for where to place their “deposits"[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Ideal Money by John Nash]So I see the Keynesians as in a weak sense comparable to the “Bolsheviks” because of the support of both parties for a certain “lack of transparency” relating to the functions of government as seen by the citizenry. And for both of them it can be said that they tend to think in terms of government agencies operating in a benevolent fashion that is, however, beyond the comprehension of the citizens of the state. And this parallel makes it seem not implausible that a process of political evolution might lead to the expectation on the part of citizens in the “great democracies” that they should be better situated to be able to understand whatever will be the monetary policies which, indeed, are typically of great importance to citizens who may have alternative options for where to place their “savings”.[/QUOTE]
In the mod forums the NEW guard was explaining to the OLD guard how LLM's and AI works. Their explanations are bullshit and wrong.
This is nick szabo explaining mostly its just marketing hype just like 'blockchain' Remember szabo is held is the number one contender for Satoshi or being the biggest part of the team behind bitcoin:
And this is chomsky. Chomsky is relevant because he is a language specialist that advanced comp sci because of his insights...
What he explains is you CAN'T have AI, without human experimentation, so the LLM tech is intrinsically limited by this type of morality etc.
A good transcript:
"Noam CHOMSKY on AI, ChatGPT, Universal Grammar and Wittgenstein Practical Wisdom Interview"
https://github.com/jalToorey/IdealMoney/...
Right.
I'm CRAZY, because I have forum 'POSTing tourette's' but I'm also a 'liar' because POST tourette's isn't a thing.
Do you think anyone doesn't understand your role here?
To be fair you only recently revealed you were lying about that. We took you at your word so we thought it was true. Now we know you were lying, how can we trust anything you say about Ideal Poker and LLMs and rake?
To be fair you only recently revealed you were lying about that. We took you at your word so we thought it was true. Now we know you were lying, how can we trust anything you say about Ideal Poker and LLMs and rake?
Right and how do you know I was in the mod forums maybe I was just making all that up right?
I think everyone understands your role here.
FWIW, searching for"LLM" in the mod forum results in exactly zero hits.
You see one of the fingerprints of the mainstream false narrative that this place has inherited is the definition of trans loosely put: "If someone says they are trans then they are".
My trans friends would find that horrifying DUCY?
And then one the same forum I can't get fair treatment, because I'm accused of getting too heated. And so I identify as having 'POST-TOURETTES' Right because thats trans is right, you just say "I'm trans" and that how it works right?
But of course we don't accommodate post-touttet's, we ban jbouton for MONTHS at a time just for responding to these hidden agents.
And then later when its useful we pretend that post-tourettes is a real mental illness?
And then when you are caught red-handed, you try to tell everyone that I'm the one that cheated the whole industry?
Wouldn't be a very good conspiracy if they new guard and the old guard spoke openly about the things they were conspiring about. They probably said things like "I can't mod Tuesday night, could someone fill in for me?" and button cracked the code.
There is no such thing as AI, not unless it comes from deep experimentation on human brains. When people talk about the emerging AI tech, its something that uses metadata with advanced search algorythms. Its actually large language model tech. etc.
Its important distinction thats getting hidden.
Can you tell me if I'm old guard or new guard and which of the two is the cooler one?
