British Politics

British Politics

Been on holiday for a few weeks, surprised to find no general discussion of British politics so though I'd kick one off.

Tory leadership contest is quickly turning into farce. Trump has backed Boris, which should be reason enough for anyone with half a brain to exclude him.

Of the other candidates Rory Stewart looks the best of the outsiders. Surprised to see Cleverly and Javid not further up the betting, but not sure the Tory membership are ready for a brown PM.

https://www.oddschecker.com/politics/bri...

Regarding the LD leadership contest, Jo Swinson is miles ahead of any other candidate (and indeed any of the Tory lot). Should be a shoe in.

Finally, it's Groundhog Day in Labour - the more serious the anti-Semitism claims get, the more Corbyn's cronies write their own obituary by blaming it on outlandish conspiracy theories - this week, it's apparently the Jewish Embassy's fault...

) 3 Views 3
01 June 2019 at 06:29 AM
Reply...

3651 Replies

5
w


by Willd k

Care to provide any evidence for this "wave of arrests and harsh sentences"? The only example I've seen in this thread was a person arrested for saying "set fire to the hotels full of the bastards for all I care", which is at least debatable as to whether it's calling for violent action rather than just an opinion, and she hasn't been sentenced yet.

another random person reposted the same tweet content, with minimal/no interaction by others, got 38 months

https://www.northantstelegraph.co.uk/new...

Other content that person was sentenced for was about how to not be tracked by police to participate in PROTESTS, not in riots, in PROTESTS.

This is the judge explaining the sentence

“Following his posting of the message ‘That’s 100 per cent the plan, plus gloves. No car either so no number plates to travel and a change of clothes nearby your other posts on X made clear a desire to be involved in organised protests in Northampton and provided guidance to others on techniques to avoid police detection.

And other posts about PROTESTING under an immigration lawyer office. PROTESTING

this is a violation of basic human rights completly incompatible with civilized society, and it's VERY clear the government is doing this in order to scare countless others to speak their minds, which is exceptionally maoist/fascist. They are willing to arrest you if you try to organize PROTESTS if they can in any way link that to "racism" which they decide how to define.

These events are fully indefensible.

And this is cheshire police official twitter account posting a 3 tweets thread about a 55y woman being arrest for posting misinformation

https://x.com/cheshirepolice/status/1821...

If you don't think these events are of the utmost gravity, completly outside the line of what is acceptable of government, and most importantly very different from what was done when it was the left rioting , burning cities, attacking police officers and so on, i don't know what to add


by BOIDS k

if the uk govt is really serious about locking people up for shitty internet posting then its going to get a lot quieter in here

Some spokeperson from London police went on video explaining how they are going to ask for extradition of people who break UK laws from outside the UK, which is another insane thing that's going on right now. Hopefully it won't find any country willing to do that but Canada might actually, given the same fascist attitude exists there wrt free speech censorship.


Btw this is clearly why if you have legal access to guns in your country, your very life and liberty depend on never giving it up, because you are just one election away from losing your basic freedoms otherwise.


Oh another thing, how comes the "crime" of tweeting stuff the government dislikes get sentenced in a week, while the assassination of 3 girls and the wounding of like 9 more is scheduled for trial in january next year?


I’m satisfied that guy committed a crime, but 38 months does seem quite harsh. Seems to be a kind of results orientated sentencing policy which is a bit troubling.


by Luciom k

Oh another thing, how comes the "crime" of tweeting stuff the government dislikes get sentenced in a week, while the assassination of 3 girls and the wounding of like 9 more is scheduled for trial in january next year?

I would guess this is just a practical matter relating to the severity of the crimes.


by Luciom k

Some spokeperson from London police went on video explaining how they are going to ask for extradition of people who break UK laws from outside the UK, which is another insane thing that's going on right now. Hopefully it won't find any country willing to do that but Canada might actually, given the same fascist attitude exists there wrt free speech censorship.

It seems reasonable to ask for extradition of people promoting violence specifically in the UK.


I believe those convicted so far have all pled guilty. Anyone pleadung not guilty will get a jury trial which will take much longer.


by Trakk k

It seems reasonable to ask for extradition of people promoting violence specifically in the UK.

lol? So israel can ask for extradition of everyone everywhere who ever posted pro-hamas or pro-intifada content? really? Trump DOJ could ask for extradition of anyone who say in the UK or Poland or Italy or Argentina wrote "good job BLM the police needed some kicking"? are we talking seriously or what?


by chezlaw k

I believe those convicted so far have all pled guilty. Anyone pleadung not guilty will get a jury trial which will take much longer.

ok thx that might be it


by Luciom k

lol? So israel can ask for extradition of everyone everywhere who ever posted pro-hamas or pro-intifada content? really? Trump DOJ could ask for extradition of anyone who say in the UK or Poland or Italy or Argentina wrote "good job BLM the police needed some kicking"? are we talking seriously or what?

Yeah nevermind you’re right, I guess with the exception of very specific/targeted stuff.


by Luciom k

Oh another thing, how comes the "crime" of tweeting stuff the government dislikes get sentenced in a week, while the assassination of 3 girls and the wounding of like 9 more is scheduled for trial in january next year?

This is exactly the same stupid question that the neo-Nazis on twitter are asking, who also have no concept of how the criminal justice system works, with longer waits for trials for those who don't plead guilty.


by Luciom k

another random person reposted the same tweet content, with minimal/no interaction by others, got 38 months

https://www.northantstelegraph.co.uk/new...

Other content that person was sentenced for was about how to not be tracked by police to participate in PROTESTS, not in riots, in PROTESTS.

This is the judge explaining the sentence

“Following his posting of the message ‘That’s 100 per cent the plan, plus gloves. No

According to posts of yours, people "protesting" in this manner against the government should be put to death so you seem very confused.


by jalfrezi k

This is exactly the same stupid question that the neo-Nazis on twitter are asking, who also have no concept of how the criminal justice system works, with longer waits for trials for those who don't plead guilty.

Yes thanks chezlaw answered that already, sorry if i didn't think people ACTUALLY plead guilty, i thought that only happened in the movies


When you plead guilty you may get a lighter sentence than if you plead innocence but are found guilty, and lawyers advise their clients of this.


@willd


Still thinking no exceptional violation of basic human right is going on? presence at a protest that turns violent, proof you were NOT participating in any violence, and you get arrested anyway?


by jalfrezi k

According to posts of yours, people "protesting" in this manner against the government should be put to death so you seem very confused.

Luciom?


deleted my answer because i don't actually know the rules that apply in this marxist forum about the content i had written. Sent DM which clarifies there is absolutely no contradiction in my model, it's about what you can do vs a democratically decided policy that doesn't violate basic human rights vs what you can do when basic human rights are violated.


No, what you've argued for is a government's absolute right to sentence people to death in courts if they protest against official government policy.


No, I argued that if they violently riot jfc stop lying.

I also argued that political action to deny basic negative rights (like for ex asking to incarcerate the non vaccinated) should be banned which is a different topic


You argued that if they attack people or property it should be an automatic death sentence.

You also argued that if people don't agree with the rules and values of their country they should leave or face deportation.

What do you think should happen to

a) the violent rioters who attacked people and property, and

b) non-violent people marching against immigration, and

c) people posting anti-immigrant sentiments on social media?


by Luciom k

Some spokeperson from London police went on video explaining how they are going to ask for extradition of people who break UK laws from outside the UK, which is another insane thing that's going on right now. Hopefully it won't find any country willing to do that but Canada might actually, given the same fascist attitude exists there wrt free speech censorship.

Erm... that's how extradition works. The requesting nation asks the requested nation to render someone who has broken the requesting nation's laws. The essential test is 'bi-criminality', meaning that the offence for which extradition is requested is also a crime of significant gravity (the usual rule being a prison sentence of at least one year on conviction) in the requested nation. The requested nation can claim an exemption for 'political offences' (the Russian poet Osip Mandelstam was sent to Gulag and killed for insulting Josef Stalin's moustache, comparing it to a couple of cockroaches -- this was dealt with internally, but had the USSR sought Mandelstam's extradition from France, England, the USA or any other likely haunt of Soviet expats, they wouldn't have got anywhere), but there might be cases where incitement to violence and disorder meet the bi-criminality test.


Although it is sad to see Britain destroy itself in this fashion because it was such a great nation; at the end of the day if Britain's choose this path, then so be it. As an American I selfishly think we should encourage British people who haven't completely given up on Western civilization to emigrate here and continue participating in the Western liberal exceptionalism project.

Another potential positive of seeing this rapid self destruction in real time is that nations that are starting on this path, but aren't so far along, can see the end of the runway and course correct.


No thanks. I'd prefer to be part of a positive multicultural society and let the quasi fascists go to the US where they belong.


by jalfrezi k

No thanks. I'd prefer to be part of a positive multicultural society and let the quasi fascists go to the US where they belong.

So it seems there is common ground. Let Britain go the way it is going, and the Brits that dont like it can migrate somewhere else in the Anglosphere*

*This really only applies to upper middle class and upper class persons who have skills/value to bring to other nations. The lower class Brits that dont like the way things are going are proper ****ed, but that is kind of how these things generally go. It is what it is.

Reply...