Politics posters chess thread

Politics posters chess thread

Mods - I hope this is OK, if not, move to LC or something.

Seems we've got a few chess players here, and some threads end up getting derailed arranging chess games. Figured maybe we could have a thread for it. So far, lagtight and I have played quite a few games, forumula72 and luckbox have expressed a wish to play, and a few other posters have taken an interest in passing. Post here to set up a game! We have been playing on chess.com so far.

22 September 2020 at 03:45 PM
Reply...

185 Replies

5
w


...0-0



be2


dag idk looks like your pawn structure is jacked up if he can get away with e5.


by d2_e4 k

Good to know, now we're on an even footing. BTW, I am a GM.

Spoiler
Show

I too was once photographed with a chess board.


Why is the board placed at a 90 degree angle?


Well if he does that now, I can take with the knight on f3. But his next move will probably add a defender to the e5 square, so there will be a bit of a battle for the centre, yes.


by Trolly McTrollson k

Why is the board placed at a 90 degree angle?

That's the GM seating position, for advanced players only.


Would love to see a top-level blitz game where the board is 90 degrees for both players.


by Trolly McTrollson k

Would love to see a top-level blitz game where the board is 90 degrees for both players.

Considering they can all play blindfolded, I don't know that it would make any difference.


...Nc6



h3


...Ne4



O-O


Gorg, I've worked through the position, if you play e5, I'm playing dxe5 so you can make the next move then post if you like.


I think we're going to try ...b6 instead.



bb5


I'm getting the distinct feeling I might be in a spot of trouble already.


by d2_e4 k

I'm getting the distinct feeling I might be in a spot of trouble already.

Be2 was a waste because bb5 was always the plan .
At a 10sec glance you seem just fine .
FWIW I think black were too slow .


Wasn't the plan. I'm doing it now because the knight is no longer defended, and also because every other move seems to lose material pretty quickly!


by d2_e4 k

Wasn't the plan. I'm doing it now because the knight is no longer defended, and also because every other move seems to lose material pretty quickly!

Well even before b6 the structure of the pawns with c5 made Bb5 the right square when he plays nc6 .
So u get a hold on e5 and u keep back bishop on c8 bad with bad pawn structure, hoping an engame of knight vs c8 bad bishop .

It’s a common theme in some caro-kann variation line.
I think it’s the la of variation if my “poor”memory is right .
If u can exchange that bishop with black knight .
Sorry I’ll shut up and let you play guys 😀


All good, enjoying the analysis. I have a feeling I'm outclassed here, so my best hope is probably to try and exchange off everything and eke out a draw!


by d2_e4 k

I have a feeling I'm outclassed here

I don't know what on earth gave you that idea. I'm pretty decent at correspondence, but my peak CCF rating was only 1870. I had a USCF rating for a couple of years that never got above 1700.

...Bb7

can't do screenshots as easily at work but I'll try later.


What's the chess.com equivalent of that?

bxc6


by d2_e4 k

What's the chess.com equivalent of that?

bxc6

I dunno probably about the same. I hate chess.com.


You saw I moved, right? I assume you're taking back?


by d2_e4 k

You saw I moved, right? I assume you're taking back?

Oh I see what you mean. Yeah, Bxc6. Sorry. I saw you moved but didn't even look at what it actually was. Posting pattern will be weird until I get home. Just looking when I get some time.

Yes, ...Bxc6.

Reply...