Moderation Questions
The last iteration of the moderation discussion thread was a complete disaster. Numerous attempts to keep it on topic fa
I probably deserved the last ban I got cuz **** that guy, I have no qualms about telling him what a POS he is and regret none of it if his 9-5 is posting hateful performance art attacking anyone in this forum who doesn’t believe what he believes
Before that I got banned cuz I kept intentionally misspelling his name and apparently that impacted his MENTAL HEALTH which is exhaustingly stupid
My broader point stands
There is no world where you can convince me this forum is a better place cuz Luciom is able to post his stream of consciousness at minimum 50 times a day protected from attack
just read a bunch of d2 posts or train your chatgpt on them and you will learn how to endlessly insult people without any repercussions.
That's an insanely stupid standard. Every person with an organizational structure should be banned as soon as one person in their org is found to be doing something morally wrong?
I wrote ''ban'' because I wasn't sure what he meant with ban, I'm assuming he meant to no longer allow to watch Mr Beast which is what I said I did in my household. Yeah I stand by that.
Not that I care about the standards of someone who would chop the breasts off a 14 year old girl or refer to a 7 year old boy as a she.
I’m down for the cause if I can endlessly insult people. That’d be fun
I wrote ''ban'' because I wasn't sure what he meant with ban, I'm assuming he meant to no longer allow to watch Mr Beast which is what I said I did in my household. Yeah I stand by that.
Not that I care about the standards of someone who would chop the breasts off a 14 year old girl or refer to a 7 year old boy as a she.
False. I said 16 year old not 14 year old.
srm 4 mod
This isn't a mod issue per se, but I find it interesting that several active members of this forum have been outraged at Luckbox for years for initially denying Sandyhook happened, on the auspice it was perpetuating trauma and harm.
And yet when members of this forum continually deny October 7th atrocities, and do so in an extremely malicious manner (which Luckbox has never been accused of), these same members are now completely agnostic towards any trauma or harm.
Very interesting dichotomy. I would say Luckbox is owed an apology, and maybe some soul searching why you have so much empathy for the Sandyhook victims and survivors, and so little for the October 7th ones.
This isn't a mod issue per se, but I find it interesting that several active members of this forum have been outraged at Luckbox for years for initially denying Sandyhook happened, on the auspice it was perpetuating trauma and harm. And yet when members of this forum continually deny October 7th atrocities, and do so in an extremely malicious manner (which Luckbox has never be
i think that srm's first mod duty should be tackling this
This isn't a mod issue per se, but I find it interesting that several active members of this forum have been outraged at Luckbox for years for initially denying Sandyhook happened, on the auspice it was perpetuating trauma and harm. And yet when members of this forum continually deny October 7th atrocities, and do so in an extremely malicious manner (which Luckbox has never be
I haven't been following the I/P thread that closely. Are people denying that there was an attack on October 7 in which many people died? Are people alleging that the apparent victims in that attack were actually crisis actors? Are people alleging that the entire thing was a ruse orchestrated by the Israeli government (or some shadow government) for inscrutable reasons?
If any of that is happening, that's really nuts, and I agree that it shouldn't be allowed.
I even know what my avatar would be as politics mod
Spoiler
I haven't been following the I/P thread that closely. Are people denying that there was an attack on October 7 in which many people died? Are people alleging that the apparent victims in that attack were actually crisis actors? Are people alleging that the entire thing was a ruse orchestrated by the Israeli government (or some shadow government) for inscrutable reasons?If an
They claim they were all ex-militaries and no rape occurred, so it was an act of war (a justified one given the "oppression").
So at the very least they deny the mass rape confirmed by the UN, and the death of children, and that children were taken as hostages.
Well they aren’t even remotely the same
Innocent kids being killed at school by randoms
Ex Military people on stolen land throwing a party in a war zone
I wasn't here for the Sandy Hook denials, but this is one of the most vile posts I have read on this forum.
Palestinian land was stolen by pre IDF forces and their land has been stolen from them little by little since then
Israel has mandatory conscription so the vast vast majority of its people are ex military. If combat is needed they will become combatants
A rave is a party. A war zone is a place where people are killed and weapons of wars are used. The areas around a border between two warring entities is called a war zone
I appreciate that Oct 7 was horrible. I do not think you are aware of what was actually happening.
Feel free to disprove any of my statements
I haven't been following the I/P thread that closely. Are people denying that there was an attack on October 7 in which many people died? Are people alleging that the apparent victims in that attack were actually crisis actors? Are people alleging that the entire thing was a ruse orchestrated by the Israeli government (or some shadow government) for inscrutable reasons?If an
none of that is happening.
I haven't been following the I/P thread that closely. Are people denying that there was an attack on October 7 in which many people died? Are people alleging that the apparent victims in that attack were actually crisis actors? Are people alleging that the entire thing was a ruse orchestrated by the Israeli government (or some shadow government) for inscrutable reasons?If an
Is this happening?
I haven't been following the I/P thread that closely. Are people denying that there was an attack on October 7 in which many people died? Are people alleging that the apparent victims in that attack were actually crisis actors? Are people alleging that the entire thing was a ruse orchestrated by the Israeli government (or some shadow government) for inscrutable reasons?If an
current thinking is as follows:
israel knew the attack was coming and allowed it in order to have an excuse to genocide the palestinians
no rape. the eyewitnesses are all lying
of the israelis found dead on oct 7, all were legitimate targets and almost all were killed by the IDF, not hamas
the number of palestinians killed by israel since oct 7 is between 500,000 and 600,000
I was just trying to understand whether Kelhus's analogy actually made sense.
