Vice-President Kamala Harris
Probably requires her own thread at this moment, lock/delete etc if someone else wins the nom
Might be the start of a movement here
Muslims for Trump. "MAGA muslims" has a nice ring to it.
I don't know. That mayor seems pretty smart to me, choosing Trump over cackling Kamala.
Well Biden/Harris haven't been able to organise a ceasefire, so voting for Kamala obviously won't help.
Well Biden/Harris haven't been able to organise a ceasefire, so voting for Kamala obviously won't help.
This statement was made under the illogical assumption that things can’t get worse under Trump, which they absolutely can. Trump said he wants to deport people that “support hamas” whatever that means. I’m sure that will include some of his constituents so that would be hilarious.
Also ironic is that this guy is Yemeni, he must really hate his home country to want Trump back in power.
Anyway like I said, failed mayor endorsing a failed former president.
This statement was made under the illogical assumption that things can’t get worse under Trump, which they absolutely can. Trump said he wants to deport people that “support hamas” whatever that means. I’m sure that will include some of his constituents so that would be hilarious.
Also ironic is that this guy is Yemeni, he must really hate his home country to want Trump back in power.
Anyway like I said, failed mayor endorsing a failed former president.
Maybe he's just thinking about the economy, jobs etc which were definitely better under Trump than under Biden/harris. You know the normal stuff that effects people from day to day. Maybe that's more important to him than some conflict in a far off country that he has no direct affect on their lives. I think it's called being pragmatic.
Maybe he's just thinking about the economy, jobs etc which were definitely better under Trump than under Biden/harris. You know the normal stuff that effects people from day to day. Maybe that's more important to him than some conflict in a far off country that he has no direct affect on their lives. I think it's called being pragmatic.
Except he explicitly said that Gaza was one of the things he wanted Trump to address.
https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/l...
You’re just shooting from the hip on all this, huh? You just saw the headline and didn’t actually read anything about this guy.
He cost you a trillion dollars, caused 500k needless burials and left the US economy trainwrecked, all because he couldn't be honest for the most important week of his presidency.
And when that projected him to lose the election he refused to commit to a peaceful transition of power, he tried to pressure election officials to falsify election outcomes and he wanted his vice-president and allies in congress stop the certification of a democratic election.
But by all means, continue the trolling. That's what modern day conservatism is about.
Oh, you guys just meeting BJ?
Except he explicitly said that Gaza was one of the things he wanted Trump to address.
https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/l...
You’re just shooting from the hip on all this, huh? You just saw the headline and didn’t actually read anything about this guy.
Like I said, he's not going to get a ceasefire with Biden or Harris. That's obvious. Trump has said he want's to end the conflict. So he's going with Trump. Whether that works out or not remains to be seen, but it seems a logical choice to me.
Like I said, he's not going to get a ceasefire with Biden or Harris. That's obvious. Trump has said he want's to end the conflict. So he's going with Trump. Whether that works out or not remains to be seen, but it seems a logical choice to me.
Nuking the Gaza Strip would also end the conflict. Ending the conflict is not what this guy said he wanted.
I don’t see how it’s a logical choice to go with the guy who left the economy in shambles and who spiked immigration as he left office only to block an immigration bill. Also the guy that tried to steal an election and lied about rigging it, who deferred on all of America’s problems emboldening our adversaries, and whose irresponsible fiscal spending led to ballooning deficits and terrible monetary policy.
Who knows. When it comes to MAGA you're not really debating the person anyway. You're just responding to what their online orthodoxy decided was true this week.
There is no substance, they'll just act as if their statement are jokes and regard any outsider who responds as an idiot. Only in assembly with each-other will they argue their statements and stand by them.
Who knows. When it comes to MAGA you're not really debating the person anyway. You're just responding to what their online orthodoxy decided was true this week.
There is no substance, they'll just act as if their statement are jokes and regard any outsider who responds as an idiot. Only in assembly with each-other will they believe their statements and stand by them.
Don't forget accusing everyone who bites of being a TDS case.
Muslims as a block are generally intolerant and conservative, and reject liberal norms. Old world grievances are really the only reason they would be in the Democratic coalition in the first place. So if they think both candidates are comparable in addressing their tribal Old World grievances, why wouldn't they embrace the Republican Party?
Muslims as a block are generally intolerant and conservative, and reject liberal norms. Old world grievances are really the only reason they would be in the Democratic coalition in the first place. So if they think both candidates are comparable in addressing their tribal Old World grievances, why wouldn't they embrace the Republican Party?
muslims might be socially conservatives (although muslims in the USA aren't a random sample of muslims worldwide, strong selection effects apply for emigrants that have to travel a lot), but they like free stuff paid by others so they are natural democrat voters
Muslims as a block are generally intolerant and conservative, and reject liberal norms. Old world grievances are really the only reason they would be in the Democratic coalition in the first place. So if they think both candidates are comparable in addressing their tribal Old World grievances, why wouldn't they embrace the Republican Party?
Voting for hardcore right evangelist republicans won’t protect their freedom Of religion .
Maybe he's just thinking about the economy, jobs etc which were definitely better under Trump than under Biden/harris. You know the normal stuff that effects people from day to day. Maybe that's more important to him than some conflict in a far off country that he has no direct affect on their lives. I think it's called being pragmatic.
Me going to the banks and borrowing 1 trillions dollars would make me feel
Great, rich and smart .
Until I got to pay it back …..
And btw he just did as good as obama .
You know obama that got stuck with the GFC 2008 ….
So trump with 8trillions deficit could not do better then a recovery economy /
Another aucceful swindle for trump at the expense of BJ …
Because you are the one stuck paying it down one way or the other BJ.
Remember ? Trump love not paying taxes …
This is why Harris should have picked Shapiro as VP.
I have a difficult time imagining Walz autographing bombs, and it’s one of the things I like about him
I have a difficult time imagining Walz autographing bombs, and it’s one of the things I like about him
But you are exactly NOT the kind of people the campaign needs to motivate to vote democrat, are you? you would vote democrat regardless which is why their choices should disregard your preferences completly.
All efforts should be spent toward people who could not vote, or vote third party, or vote the other side. Loyal soldiers are already in the bag and don't matter for campaign purposes.
The first year in office (when far from the next election) is when you reward loyalists with the most drastical policies you can pass
Yeah, what's with this signing of bombs that will probably end up killing some poor civilians? Nikki Haley did it too. It's grotesque.
Yeah, what's with this signing of bombs that will probably end up killing some poor civilians? Nikki Haley did it too. It's grotesque.
Centrists like america killing, or helping other kill, enemies of the west as a moral outcome, if not a moral imperative. It's like a core pillar of what makes america what it is and what they like.
Centrists like america killing, or helping other kill, enemies of the west as a moral outcome, if not a moral imperative. It's like a core pillar of what makes america what it is and what they like.
Well sure, but flagrantly displaying pleasure in killing people like that is beyond disgusting. What the hell is wrong with these people?
