Deep stack equity bomb 💣
Villain aggro tag. Thinking was we'd have better fold equity vs player type. And if we XR smaller we're only ever paying off so why not put the foot down now with some credibility?
Then the time ran out before I could decide if it was a good idea or not so I did it anyway. In case it was.
BTN: 142.8 BB
Hero (SB): 201.8 BB
BB: 106.6 BB
UTG: 274.4 BB
MP: 129.8 BB
CO: 171.2 BB
Hero posts SB 0.4 BB, BB posts BB 1 BB
Pre Flop: (pot: 1.4 BB) Hero has K♣ T♣
UTG raises to 3 BB, fold, fold, fold, Hero raises to 12 BB, fold, UTG calls 9 BB
Flop: (25 BB, 2 players) 9♠ 2♣ J♠
Hero bets 12 BB, UTG calls 12 BB
Turn: (49 BB, 2 players) 8♣
Hero checks, UTG bets 29.2 BB, Hero raises to 177.8 BB and is all-in
6 Replies
Problem is that you would not do this with over-pair and if villain is thinking player he would recognise this, so it leaves you with JJ and 99, QTs also is not going all-in on your side.
Don't like preflop if he is aggro, would rather just call at 200bb.
I'd like turn better if you bet smaller OTF.
As played I'd just call. You bet bigger OTF and his stab sizing is pretty large.
On such a dynamic board with so much money behind and playing deepstack out of position being the plague I think I would just range check flop. Your bet size is weird, it hasn't much fold equity and still inflates the pot, while your hand is OK-ish but not great. Also UTG definitively has JJ, 99 and maybe even 22 here (considering the depth), it's not like if you have nut advantage.
UTG bet size is concerning on the turn, but it's a little bit weird, much bigger than block but also not really setting up a river shove.
This looks much less crazy than previous time when you posted another turn shove ah ah
Huge bets and raises work much better vs capped ranges. Everyone will call you with 2p+ and top pair+FD, so there is no overfolding in this spot unless you have some super read that this size is capped.
#puntville
