Joe Rogan
As an aside the way the sharks are now circling for Rogan, I find despicable but also template.
I think it is exactly why many on the right have learned you never apologize as that leads to a feeding frenzy, on the left to try and end you. It is what they call the left eating their own, and yes, Joe Rogan is a lefty even if you believe he is left who says wrong things and lacks polish.
In the very segment I am watching on CNN as i type this Jim Costa keeps saying "Joe Rogen was caught repeatedly saying the 'N-Word' when Jim is doing the same thing. Rogen just thought hiding behind saying the 'N-Word' instead of saying the actual word was not productive or silly.
So Costa says 'that guy just the said N-word' and every one says, that is fine to say.
Rogan says 'That guy just said n*&^er' and they say that is wrong to say and worse they cut the reply of that quote so tight you only hear the word said without context so you will assume he was using it despairingly when he was not.
And I am not saying Rogan has never, in all his years of making long form public statements said anything that does not sound off or bad as he has and has admitted it. But anyone who has listened to much of his comment and context over the years would never assume he was anything but a lefty. this idea of him being a righty only really took root as he was in opposition to much of the science around covid and some people believe being so then requires you be put on sides.
So now we know Kamala was willing to do Rogan but only for an hour and she would not go to his studio
Sad to think we may get a DEI president
How is an hour not enough for an interview? Weren't there any protein shake conspiracy theorists Rogan could've booked to fill out the remainder of his time slot?
We've had way more dudes coasting along on daddy's money&connections--and that's what's actually built the corrupt system everyone claims to hate. Thinking another billionaire heir is going to do anything to truly improve reg. working people's lives ahead of looking out for their own is nothing but hopes and dreams--that will not be coming true lol
Not that I would describe myself as "the right", but I would absolutely be interested in knowing if Harris was going to be doing an interview with a non-überfriendly host with limited ability for handlers to pull her out when it turns south. If only to lump more money on Trump and then arb it afterwards
is that really important, how they do on tv for gotcha moments ?
or the actual work and policies they enact that should matter ?
We've had way more dudes coasting along on daddy's money&connections--and that's what's actually built the corrupt system everyone claims to hate. Thinking another billionaire heir is going to do anything to truly improve reg. working people's lives ahead of looking out for their own is nothing but hopes and dreams--that will not be coming true lol
Trump actually lost money by being president. It always amuses me when people say he's just in it for himself.
i mean, nothing proves my point better than a bunch of right leaning people quoting my post going "BuT wE dOnT kNoW aNyThInG aBoUt HeR!!1!!"
she's done cnn, fox, the late show, 60 minutes, the view, howard stern, call her daddy just off the top of my head, plus a dozen or more rallies. the only way you dont know about Harris is because you dont want to know.
i think rogan would have been a decent-ish idea two weeks ago, but to give up what basically is a whole day of flying to texas, probably 5-6hrs for interview stuff with commuting, and then flying out to somewhere that matters its too much this late.. i mean even trump just basically pissed on his rally goers by showing up 3hrs late with no notice.
Yeah, we know Orange man bad.
proofs is about proving things actually exist.
proving non existing concept is a great illustration of how your brain works.
trump made a stupid claim, so why cant he back it up .
but i understand you need that kind of logic to sustain your concept of 2020 election got stolen.
prove me the election wasnt stolen instead of proving it was stolen shrug
i think rogan would have been a decent-ish idea two weeks ago, but to give up what basically is a whole day of flying to texas, probably 5-6hrs for interview stuff with commuting, and then flying out to somewhere that matters its too much this late.. i mean even trump just basically pissed on his rally goers by showing up 3hrs late with no notice.
Was doing Rogan a negative for Trump?
it was a comfy no pushback interview with a likeminded host that just wanted to platform him. and he almost managed to still screw it up.
i dont think it was a negative because trump NEEDS that demographic of people to vote if he wants any chance. if the young wannabe alpha magabr0s stay home which their demographic tends to do, trump loses.
I think it helped Bernie quite a bit when he went on Rogan. Even if she's a trainwreck, i don't think she'd be losing much and I think she's got a lot of opportunity there if she did have a solid performance.
This pretty much sums it up and accurate. prolly one of the more unbaised takes in here as well
i mean, nothing proves my point better than a bunch of right leaning people quoting my post going "BuT wE dOnT kNoW aNyThInG aBoUt HeR!!1!!"
she's done cnn, fox, the late show, 60 minutes, the view, howard stern, call her daddy just off the top of my head, plus a dozen or more rallies. the only way you dont know about Harris is because you dont want to know.
i think rogan would have been a decent-ish idea two weeks ago, but to give up what basically is a whole day of flying to texas, probably
You really believe it matters for them and they care ?
Thought the podcast went well
i mean, nothing proves my point better than a bunch of right leaning people quoting my post going "BuT wE dOnT kNoW aNyThInG aBoUt HeR!!1!!"
she's done cnn, fox, the late show, 60 minutes, the view, howard stern, call her daddy just off the top of my head, plus a dozen or more rallies. the only way you dont know about Harris is because you dont want to know.
i think rogan would have been a decent-ish idea two weeks ago, but to give up what basically is a whole day of flying to texas, probably
Maybe they had a very good reason why Kamala didn't, or at least hasn't done Rogan yet but I think not doing so is an epic **** up.
You're going to have close to 100 million people not vote in this election for a whole host of reasons, with many of those people being young, minorities and people who could potentially vote for Harris. Sure, Rogan isn't going to bring in a swath of dem voters but nobody other than a bunch of established olds are going to watch a CNN rally of Kamala slowly speaking out talking points in front of a bunch of paid employees to whistle and chirp at all the right moments to pander to people who are already locked up in their decision - or any of the other shows that you listed that she's gone on. Lol at 60 mins and the view.
Kamala has debate skills, we've seen that. At worst, dems will still very likely have all kinds of opportunity to run specific clips from the show to use as they see fit.
At best, you'll get the opportunity for Kamala to speak her own beliefs and show a little of her own humane, strengths and weakness as a person, instead of being a scripted robot from the DNC. She'd probably gain a lot of respect and a little more trust.
Also, the avg age for Rogan lsiteners is very young, and many of them don't vote.
At best, you'll get the opportunity for Kamala to speak her own beliefs and show a little of her own humane, strengths and weakness as a person, instead of being a scripted robot from the DNC. She'd probably gain a lot of respect and a little more trust.
she's already done this multiple times but people that want to say this keep saying it anyway. lol. again proving the point.
she's already done this multiple times but people that want to say this keep saying it anyway. lol. again proving the point.
Sure, and it probably helped her to go on those shows - and she's at least done better than Hillary on that front. But tapping into 60 mins and the view really isn't going to do ****, and Rogan probably would get Kamala 50x the exposure over Howard Stern.
My assumption was that the right didn't want Kamala on Rogan or that Rogan didn't want her on because he's a trump supporter. But if Kamala didn't do it because she's afraid or that it was believed that it would cost them votes then that's just a decision that I would vehemently disagree with. It's essentially a free role and she's behind.
