Trump 2nd term prediction thread

Trump 2nd term prediction thread

So, looks like Trump not only smashed the electoral college, but is looking on track to win the popular vote, which seems to be an unexpected turn of events, but a clear sign of the current temperature in the country and perhaps the wider world.

Would be interested to hear views on how his 2nd term will pan out from both sides of the aisle - major happenings, what he's going to get done, what he's not going to get done, the impact of his election on the current conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza, whether his popularity will remain the same, wane, or increase, etc.

A bit of an anemic OP, I know, just interested to hear people's thoughts now that the election uncertainty is over.

) 16 Views 16
06 November 2024 at 12:32 PM
Reply...

3563 Replies

5
w


by Land O Lakes k

They will have zero effect on my or my family's life, but do tell, what should I be deeply scared about?

Oh I thought you had leftist preferences so you would be scared by a complete disregard of CO2 emissions by the federal government or mass deportation of illegal aliens as something you consider bad outcomes for society.

Because they are both going to happen at least to some extent.


by Luciom k

a complete disregard of CO2 emissions by the federal government

And then find a way to blame the increase in frequency of severity of extreme weather events on the democrats. And their voters will believe them.


by Land O Lakes k

They will have zero effect on my or my family's life, but do tell, what should I be deeply scared about?

It’s funny calling the left are the one scared like luciom
Does and yet it’s the right that keep defend owning guns because they scared so much and need weapons to defend themselves for every unlikely events that could happens in their life’s…

Who’s most pro prison because we are scared of « bad people » ?
Who’s more pro military because we are scared of the world surrounding us ?
Etc etc …

Yeah the left is sure scared of a lot of things Luciom .


by d2_e4 k

And then find a way to blame the increase in frequency of severity of extreme weather events on the democrats. And their voters will believe them.

Yup it’s the laser technology that democrats holds that create all those climate problems…


by Land O Lakes k

He's going to do nothing but play golf and be a clown on Twitter while Stephen Miller tries to figure out how to keep him in power.

Keep him in power? This is it. 4 and out. Get it done and pass it off. He's not worried about reelection. He really is about MAGA. He has the will and desire to make this country better instead of enriching lobbiests and catering to the "deep state".


by mrbaseball k

Keep him in power? This is it. 4 and out. Get it done and pass it off. He's not worried about reelection. He really is about MAGA. He has the will and desire to make this country better instead of enriching lobbiests and catering to the "deep state".

And why maga states aren’t doing it for their constituents and waits for the federal to do anything about it ?

You believe all those poor people was due to the federal government?


Kash Patel is likely gonna be selected as the Directof of the CIA. If this happens it would mean there's been a major win/step forward in taking down the DS since the CIA is one of the agencies they've heavily infultrated (not on the lower levels but in the upper rankes). Kash Patel speaks about a lot of the things I do (he's a "conspiracy theorist" omg) he's awake and aware.


by d2_e4 k

And then find a way to blame the increase in frequency of severity of extreme weather events on the democrats. And their voters will believe them.

See this is what we call complete bad faith.

There is no model existing that tells you that emissions have instantaneous impact. No serious scientist will tell you that.

Emissions during the Trump presidency won't have any effect on global climate in the immediate.

In 2058 maybe some negative weather event will be 4% or 7% more likely, and 8% more severe, than it would have been otherwise because of american emissions 2025-2028. Maybe.

That's what science tells us.

Yet you come out with this absurd take.


by Luciom k

See this is what we call complete bad faith.

There is no model existing that tells you that emissions have instantaneous impact. No serious scientist will tell you that.

Emissions during the Trump presidency won't have any effect on global climate in the immediate.

In 2058 maybe some negative weather event will be 4% or 7% more likely, and 8% more severe, than it would have been otherwise because of american emissions 2025-2028. Maybe.

That's what science tells us.

Yet you come out with this absurd t

I'm old enough to remember when Republicans denied climate change altogether and brought snowballs into congress to "prove" it wasn't real. Then they denied that it was anthropogenic. Now they can't deny it any more, partly because extreme weather events have already increased in frequency and severity, so the only thing left is to make it someone else's fault, even though what is happening now is essentially because your guys didn't listen 30 years ago. But sure, I'm the bad faith guy here.


by Playbig2000 k

Kash Patel is likely gonna be selected as the Directof of the CIA. If this happens it would mean there's been a major win/step forward in taking down the DS since the CIA is one of the agencies they've heavily infultrated (not on the lower levels but in the upper rankes). Kash Patel speaks about a lot of the things I do (he's a "conspiracy theorist" omg) he's awake and aware.

If they know who the DS is , why didn’t trump got rid of them in his 1st term ?
If you know so much about them , doesn’t seem that deep to begin with ….

They are incredibly powerful and hidden and yet you know about them on who they are and what they do ?

Please gives us names on they are and what they do and in what mission they successfully did ?


by d2_e4 k

I'm old enough to remember when Republicans denied climate change altogether and brought snowballs into congress to "prove" it wasn't real. Then they denied that it was anthropogenic. Now they can't deny it any more, partly because extreme weather events have already increased in frequency and severity, so the only thing left is to make it someone else's fault, even though what is happening now is essentially because your guys didn't listen 30 years ago. But sure, I'm the bad faith guy here.

Remember when cigarettes was good for us ?


by d2_e4 k

I'm old enough to remember when Republicans denied climate change altogether and brought snowballs into congress to "prove" it wasn't real. Then they denied that it was anthropogenic. Now they can't deny it any more, partly because extreme weather events have already increased in frequency and severity, so the only thing left is to make it someone else's fault, even though what is happening now is essentially because your guys didn't listen 30 years ago. But sure, I'm the bad faith guy here.

The world is exceptionally better off for having disregarded emissions in the past, economically it would have been an unmitigated disaster to reduce the use of fossil fuels because "the climate".

While I would prefer a system where lying wasn't necessary to achieve preferable outcomes, people who lied to delay climate activist insanities helped the world so I can't be very concerned about that.

Until you guys keep grotesquely exaggerating the risks of climate change, and so push for insane tradeoffs that make everyone poorer, it's far preferable to have people denying it exists outright than to have people like you in power.

And btw there is no reason to believe weather events worldwide that are bad for human beings increased in intensity and frequency. It's a made up narrative and no I won't take any source by anyone who is a leftist as proof of the contrary.

It's a religion at this point and I am against theocracy


by Montrealcorp k

And why maga states aren’t doing it for their constituents and waits for the federal to do anything about it ?

You believe all those poor people was due to the federal government?

None of what you just posted makes any sense? Can Maga states close the border? Can Maga states stop excesive governement spending? Can Maga states stop the federal blob of bureaocracy pushing us into WWIII? I wish they could but unfortunately I live is a deep blue hellhole where crime runs rampant.


by Montrealcorp k

Remember when cigarettes was good for us ?

They still are for taxpayers


by mrbaseball k

Keep him in power?

Yeah, like the leaders he looks up to; Putin, Un, et al.

by mrbaseball k

He has the will and desire to make this country better instead of enriching lobbiests and catering to the "deep state".

He's part of the deep state. If he weren't, he certainly wouldn't have gotten elected last week as a felon, to name one.


by mrbaseball k

None of what you just posted makes any sense? Can Maga states close the border? Can Maga states stop excesive governement spending? Can Maga states stop the federal blob of bureaocracy pushing us into WWIII? I wish they could but unfortunately I live is a deep blue hellhole where crime runs rampant.

What maga complains mostly about isn’t dating just 3-4 years ago ….
It’s been a process span over a very long time .

Ps : you know trump is one of the highest spender ever right ?


by mrbaseball k

None of what you just posted makes any sense? Can Maga states close the border? Can Maga states stop excesive governement spending? Can Maga states stop the federal blob of bureaocracy pushing us into WWIII? I wish they could but unfortunately I live is a deep blue hellhole where crime runs rampant.

Why do you choose to live there?


guy who is supposedly going to clean up the bureaucracy and fight the deep state is gonna make Marco Rubio the Secretary of State. lol america like always.


by Land O Lakes k

He's part of the deep state. If he weren't, he certainly wouldn't have gotten elected last week as a felon, to name one.

Uhhh? The deep state tried to bankrupt him, jail him, and assasinate him. I'm pretty sure he's not on that team.


by Luciom k

The world is exceptionally better off for having disregarded emissions in the past, economically it would have been an unmitigated disaster to reduce the use of fossil fuels because "the climate".

While I would prefer a system where lying wasn't necessary to achieve preferable outcomes, people who lied to delay climate activist insanities helped the world so I can't be very concerned about that.

Until you guys keep grotesquely exaggerating the risks of climate change, and so push for insane tradeo

Oh ok, cool, at least you admit your guys lied, that's a start. Would be nice if that recognised that doesn't put you in a very strong position to be accusing others of bad faith.


by Victor k

guy who is supposedly going to clean up the bureaucracy and fight the deep state is gonna make Marco Rubio the Secretary of State. lol america like always.

could haev been worse

but tbh thinking about it, Sec of state is the main person behind foreign affairs iirc so its crazy we have had some on the lower experience end. liek someone exactly brand new is a pro but als a con since they have 0 relations

ot maybe I didnt get the job duties right


Im just loling at Trumpers. its like when "hope and change Obama" made Hillary SoS.


by Land O Lakes k

Why do you choose to live there?

I have family responsibilites. As soon as I don't I am outta there like a bat outta hell. Literal hell, it's Illinois.


by Montrealcorp k

If they know who the DS is , why didn’t trump got rid of them in his 1st term ?
If you know so much about them , doesn’t seem that deep to begin with ….

They are incredibly powerful and hidden and yet you know about them on who they are and what they do ?

Please gives us names on they are and what they do and in what mission they successfully did ?

Because they were fighting him the whole way. Don't you know what they did to him? They impeached him like 20 times, and took him to bogus kangaroo courts like 30 times and convicted him with about 100 felonies (all bogus bs). What did you think that whole fight was all about, just so he can remain president a couple more years or something much bigger like our livelihoods and Trump's grandchildren's futures were at stake?


by Luciom k

They still are for taxpayers

That’s the difference between you and me .
I gladly accept tax payment over banning something .

Reply...