2024 ELECTION THREAD
The next presidential race will be here soon! Please see current Bovada odds. Thoughts?
99% of peer reviews disagree with you .
What is a consensus when 99% isn’t ?
Hell even 90% should be considered consensus no ?
Gets tiring when you keep lying.
No they don't disagree with me, because i have never denied the world is a little more than 1 celsius hotter than the 1850-1900 average, and it is so mostly for human causes, which is what the consensus is.
I deny that's bad for cold countries, and a lot of peer reviewed science agrees with me, and when it doesn't, the negatives of that warming for cold countries are very small anyway, in literature.
Trump Accidentally Helps Dems Get Key Judicial Nominees Approved By Taking Republicans To SpaceX Launch
If the Republican senators had been there, they likely would have been able to defeat the judicial nominations.
As Republicans have been trying to drag down the process of getting Joe Biden's judicial nominees approved, Republican senators warned that Donald Trump was h
OMG the sheer incompetence of letting a few judges get through. This is your best as Biden leads the USA possibly into WW3 with his decisions on Ukraine
So, exactly what I said then, huh? It isn't classified as gene therapy, your author claims it should be and wasn't.
Cool man! We should let regulators determine what value pi has too. I'm sure they know better than mathematicians.
Its hilarious how you not only have no idea what a proper source for medical information is (hint: not EU regulators), but also you then undermine your own source by citing evidence that they don't care about reality when making their regulations.
Then you quote my post t
Lol This is gibberish.
Do you actually read your posts before posting them? You contradict yourself with evey second sentence.
Maybe try writing something that actually makes sense if you want to make a point.
OMG the sheer incompetence of letting a few judges get through. This is your best as Biden leads the USA possibly into WW3 with his decisions on Ukraine
More than a few lol.
And yes, Trump was on DF Social posting a tirade demanding the GOP stop approving the judges, then he cripples their effort to do it.
That's the very definition of incompetence.
Sorry dude, but your so called vaccine isn't a vaccine. Never was, never will be.
It's correct classification is a therapeutic.
I prefer to call it by it's more appropriate name though.
Spoiler
The clot shot.
That's wild bro. Crazy no one is talking about this!
Gets tiring when you keep lying.
No they don't disagree with me, because i have never denied the world is a little more than 1 celsius hotter than the 1850-1900 average, and it is so mostly for human causes, which is what the consensus is.
I deny that's bad for cold countries, and a lot of peer reviewed science agrees with me, and when it doesn't, the negatives of that warming for cold countries are very small anyway, in literature.
so post it...
Btw here is a thought .
Do you believe they lie and/or it’s positive economically when you got vast amount of plants, insect, animals disappearing in an alarming rate for no particular reasons ?
You believe climate changes has no impact on nature already today and surely will stay minimal as climate changes increase even more ?
Ie:
The consensus is clear – as Arctic sea ice melts, polar bears are finding it harder to hunt, mate and breed. While polar bears have shown some ability to adapt to changes in their surroundings – for example, by foraging for food on land, or swimming more to hunt for prey – scientists project that as sea ice diminishes, polar bears will find it harder to survive and populations will decline.
Trump Accidentally Helps Dems Get Key Judicial Nominees Approved By Taking Republicans To SpaceX Launch
If the Republican senators had been there, they likely would have been able to defeat the judicial nominations.
As Republicans have been trying to drag down the process of getting Joe Biden's judicial nominees approved, Republican senators warned that Donald Trump was h
That's wild bro. Crazy no one is talking about this!
so post it...
Btw here is a thought .
Do you believe they lie and/or it’s positive economically when you got vast amount of plants, insect, animals disappearing in an alarming rate for no particular reasons ?
You believe climate changes has no impact on nature already today and surely will stay minimal as climate changes increase even more ?
Ie:
I did link to a lot of papers showing how the expected damage of climate change is null or very small for cold countries.
That's when the climate pron apocalypse lovers start talking deranged things usually.
Like you are in Canada and it requires some special kind of lack of intelligence to believe Canadians are worse off if Canada gets warmer.
Sorry dude, but your so called vaccine isn't a vaccine. Never was, never will be.
It's correct classification is a therapeutic.
I prefer to call it by it's more appropriate name though.
Spoiler
The clot shot.
ItÂ’s cocksure mental ******s like you who got people killed with your abject stupidity. Your mother must be so proud of you.
ItÂ’s cocksure mental ******s like you who got people killed with your abject stupidity. Your mother must be so proud of you.
Nope it's the other guys stupidity that got them "killed" (that slightly increased their chance to die because they believed people like BJ).
I read "clot shot" many times but it didn't affect my or my family.
But I also know people who chose not to get the vaccine and as expected they didn't die either, as the chance of death for people not already in their deathbed was minuscule anyway for covid.
There are two things that are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe. -- Einstein
Nope it's the other guys stupidity that got them "killed" (that slightly increased their chance to die because they believed people like BJ).
I read "clot shot" many times but it didn't affect my or my family.
But I also know people who chose not to get the vaccine and as expected they didn't die either, as the chance of death for people not already in their deathbed was minuscule anyway for covid.
They should have been told to ask their Dr. But instead they were bombarded with bullshit. Since the “left” was pro vaccine, Trump became anti-vaccine. Because he only knows how to oppose things and to destroy. He cannot build anything up or do anything. Because he’s a dogshit human.
Trump became anti-vaccine. Because he only knows how to oppose things and to destroy. He cannot build anything up or do anything. Because he’s a dogshit human.
Trump wasn't anti-vaccine, and he hasn't destroyed anything.
You should do some research on him to find out all of the properties and buildings he's built, unless you're thinking of someone else, maybe Joe byden?
It's another major sign of colossal ignorance when they say "clot shot" because the mRNA vaccines never even had blood clots as a side effect. That was the J&J (non mRNA vaccine) that was pulled from the rotation very quickly. Their own ignorance led to them creating a nickname for the vaccines that highlights how well they react to actual problems when discovered.
It would be funny if it... actually, no this one is just hilarious.
They should have been told to ask their Dr. But instead they were bombarded with bullshit. Since the “left” was pro vaccine, Trump became anti-vaccine. Because he only knows how to oppose things and to destroy. He cannot build anything up or do anything. Because he’s a dogshit human.
This sort of susceptibility to reverse psychology even when it comes to life saving medication comports with my thesis that MAGA cultists are cretins with a mental age of about 7.
I heard they have a secret HQ in a pizza parlour in DC - you should go check it out and report back for any suspicious behaviour.
It takes zero critical thinking skills to put something in a box and marginalize it. But I'll attempt to repeat my QUESTION. Why would she back a Russian propaganda talking point, at a critical point in history, when Putin was looking for any justification for invading Ukraine? At best, it's moronic and incompetent, at worst she's a Russian asset.
I'll say again... I have no idea if she's a Russian asset. I can't answer why she's made a public statement, as a supposed non-interventionist and peace candidate, to validate a critical and easily disproven Kremlin talking point used to justify invading Ukraine. It just makes zero sense. I'm left with either she's a Russian asset or she's really stupid. Either way, is Gabbard the person you want running your national INTELLIGENCE?
Public Statements and actions:
In March 2022, Gabbard claimed that the U.S. was funding biological laboratories in Ukraine, suggesting they were conducting research into dangerous pathogens. This assertion mirrored Russian disinformation narratives
Gabbard has argued that NATO's expansion and the U.S.'s refusal to rule out Ukraine's membership provoked Russia's actions. She stated that the U.S. and NATO ignored Russia's security concerns, contributing to the conflict.
Gabbard has expressed opposition to economic sanctions on Russia, arguing that they would harm American citizens through increased energy prices and could escalate tensions.
In 2017, Gabbard met with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, a close ally of Russia. This meeting was criticized as lending legitimacy to Assad's regime and, by extension, to Russian support for him.
She has criticized U.S. media and government narratives regarding Russia, suggesting that they are not so different from Russian state-controlled media in terms of suppressing dissenting views.
Colleagues statements:
Hillary Clinton: In October 2019, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton suggested that Gabbard was being "groomed" by Russia to act as a third-party candidate, implying she was a "Russian asset." Gabbard vehemently denied the accusation and filed a defamation lawsuit against Clinton, which she later dropped.
Mitt Romney: In March 2022, Senator Mitt Romney criticized Gabbard for her comments about U.S.-funded biological laboratories in Ukraine, labeling her remarks as "treasonous lies" that could aid Russian propaganda. While he did not explicitly call her a "Russian asset," his statement implied a serious accusation.
Debbie Wasserman Schultz: In November 2024, Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz stated on MSNBC that she considered Gabbard "likely a Russian asset," citing Gabbard's foreign policy positions and past statements.
Senator Elizabeth Warren: “Do you really want her to have all of the secrets of the United States and our defense intelligence agencies when she has so clearly been in Putin’s pocket?” Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., said on MSNBC. “That just has to be a hard no.”
John Bolton: “Gabbard, like Gaetz, is like a hand grenade ready to explode,” former Trump national security adviser John Bolton said, speaking of Matt Gaetz, the former Florida congressman who is Trump's pick for attorney general. “Republicans who throw themselves on those grenades for Donald Trump are risking their own personal reputations and places in history.”
A lot of other credible people seem to think she's a Russian asset. Should we not ask questions?
Lol
This sort of susceptibility to reverse psychology even when it comes to life saving medication comports with my thesis that MAGA cultists are cretins with a mental age of about 7.
Btw you guys are vastly over representing anti-covid vax sentiments even among MAGA.
If you accept the idea that people under50 didn't need the vax to begin with because their risk was tiny regardless of vaccination these are the numbers
And I strongly suspect that among the actual at risk people (over 65), the only group among which widespread lacl of vaccination would result in significantly higher absolute mortality, even among MAGA the percentages are higher still.
And keep in mind that for everyone who already got COVID, the risk was already so low that vaccination didn't matter much anyway in absolute terms.
But I mean the narrative that majorities of republicans or maga risked death because they are stupid is too good to pass even if factually false
Hillary Clinton: In October 2019, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton suggested that Gabbard was being "groomed" by Russia to act as a third-party candidate, implying she was a "Russian asset." Gabbard vehemently denied the accusation and filed a defamation lawsuit against Clinton, which she later dropped.
Mitt Romney: In March 2022, Senator Mitt Romney criticized Gabbard for her comments about U.S.-funded biological laboratories in Ukraine, labeling her remarks as "treasonous lies" that could aid Russian propaganda. While he did not explicitly call her a "Russian asset," his statement implied a serious accusation.
Debbie Wasserman Schultz: In November 2024, Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz stated on MSNBC that she considered Gabbard "likely a Russian asset," citing Gabbard's foreign policy positions and past statements.
Senator Elizabeth Warren: “Do you really want her to have all of the secrets of the United States and our defense intelligence agencies when she has so clearly been in Putin’s pocket?” Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., said on MSNBC. “That just has to be a hard no.”
John Bolton: “Gabbard, like Gaetz, is like a hand grenade ready to explode,” former Trump national security adviser John Bolton said, speaking of Matt Gaetz, the former Florida congressman who is Trump's pick for attorney general. “Republicans who throw themselves on those grenades for Donald Trump are risking their own personal reputations and places in history.”
lol these are some of the least credible people on the planet
