2024 ELECTION THREAD
The next presidential race will be here soon! Please see current Bovada odds. Thoughts?
Trump Jr, Manafort, and Kushner meeting secretly w/ Russian lawyers in 2016. Nothing to see here.
Trump just randomly likes Russia... got them to draft up info on his finances.... oh, maybe that's why they met in secret? Nahhh...
You would think more dudes transitioning would be good for the incels, less competition and more women.
No one with human experience would think that. (a) "Dudes transitioning" are not typically attractive to heterosexual men (although you obv view them as eligible receivers) and (b) incels are typically socially ******ed dorks who do not know how to interact with other humans, much less charm them, so the number of available targets is irrelevant when one doesn't even know how to operate a gun. Neither bode well for the incel getting laid or changing his lot in life.
Carter Page thing, and the FBI's mishandling of the FISA warrants allowed this guy to slip away, and maga to claim it was a witch hunt. Carter admitted he was an informal advisor under questioning, and that there MAY have been some loose conversations about sanctions w/ Russia.
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/07/2...
Page acknowledged under questioning from Tapper that “there may have been a loose conversation” with Russian officials about U.S. sanctions, and that “a few people might have brought it up in passing.” But he added that “there was nothing in terms of any nefarious behavior” and that he’d never heard from Russians about compromising information on Hillary Clinton.
That's a slippery one though, so we'll write it off.
Roger Stone, may have known a little more than he let on about Wikileaks... but he was pardoned by Trump after being convicted, so it's all good.
Russia, Russia, Russia.... Kushner meets w/ the Putin appointed head banker of Russia, Sergey Gorkov. Upon investigation, both Gorkov and Kushner gave wildly different accounts of their purpose for the meeting, and no definitive conclusions were made. If it was an innocent meeting, why so much confusion on it's purpose?
Trumpy really likes to Praise Putin... and Orbán for that matter.
This is one of my favs though. After Trump's first trip to Moscow in the 80's, after having shown no interest in politics whatsoever to that point in his life, he comes back to America and immediately writes a paid op-ed in the NY times that he supposedly spent $100k on entitled, "There's Nothing Wrong with America's Foreign Defense Policy That a Little Backbone Can't Cure." lol... can't make this **** up.
Love u guys... have fun in here. I'm out for now!
You were serious.
OK. Clinton, a noted sex pest, enters a room alone with a woman. After he leaves, her friend finds her beaten, crying and in shock. She says she was raped. Other people see her injuries and hear the story. However, she doesn't go public for years.
Tell me a story where he isn't guilty.
I understand that Dems say "who cares" when their people do it and Reps say "who cares" when thier people do it. That was the original point.
If it's just a congressman, sure they might be ex
If evidence so strong .
Why didn’t she pursue him like the girl with trump even if it’s much later ?
Ps: when I say profile , I mean Clinton do not fit the profile of being violent and hitting woman by raping them …
Trump just saying u can grab the pus.sy of woman and they won’t say anything should hint you there is a difference …..
If evidence so strong .
Why didn’t she pursue him like the girl with trump even if it’s much later ?
Ps: when I say profile , I mean Clinton do not fit the profile of being violent and hitting woman by raping them …
Trump just saying u can grab the pus.sy of woman and they won’t say anything should hint you there is a difference …..
Lol she sued, got against the freaking sitting president of the USA and his lawyers, managed to reach the freaking supreme court of the USA, got a decision in her favor (allowing for the civil lawsuit to proceed even against a sitting president), she loses in district court, then she settles out of court for 850k USD in 1998 (that was a lot back in the day) although the settlement didn't include any admission of guilt, appeal is denied (because of the settlement)
Mind that she immediatly chose to press civil charges, there were no criminal charges pressed by prosecutors.
Timeline of legal events here
Scientists project that two-thirds of the Arctic's near-surface permafrost could be gone by 2100.
Thawing permafrost is a threat to the environment and to the people who live in the Arctic:
As permafrost thaws, it can release large amounts of carbon into the atmosphere.
These emissions could be as high as 150 billion tons of carbon by 2100.
As permafrost thaws, it can cause the land to collapse,
which can threaten the homes and ways of life of Arctic residents.
Lol she sued, got against the freaking sitting president of the USA and his lawyers, managed to reach the freaking supreme court of the USA, got a decision in her favor (allowing for the civil lawsuit to proceed even against a sitting president), she loses in district court, then she settles out of court for 850k USD in 1998 (that was a lot back in the day) although the settlement didn't include any admission of guilt, appeal is denied (because of the settlement)
Mind that she immediatly chose to
That's a different victim.
Carter Page thing, and the FBI's mishandling of the FISA warrants allowed this guy to slip away, and maga to claim it was a witch hunt. Carter admitted he was an informal advisor under questioning, and that there MAY have been some loose conversations about sanctions w/ Russia.
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/07/2...
Page acknowledged under questioning from Tapper that “there may have been a loose conversation” with Russian of
lol Carter Page. playing all the hits now. can we get some Lev Parnas and Papadopolus too.
What's up with this common defense (mostly since Trump and MAGA) about stupidity?
Not their fault they just stupid.
Wtf, couldn't you pick someone not stupid to head national security posts, or any post to begin with?
And if you realise said person is stupid then fire her or don;t nominate her?
I don't disagree with any of that, but then lots of people get shoe-horned into positions when they clearly lack the experience and/or ability - Gabbard, RFK, Biden and Harris, for example.
At least more people are sounding the alarm bells:
Tulsi Gabbard’s history with Russia is even more concerning than you think
Charles Lister, a senior fellow at the Middle East Institute who testified twice on Syria to the House Foreign Affairs Committee when Gabbard was a member, spent years debunking her various conspiracy theories about the war.
“Her consistent denial of the Syrian regime’s crimes is so wildly fringe that her potential appointment as DNI is genuinely alarming,” he told The Independent.
“Al-Qaeda attacked us on 9/11 and must be defeated. Obama won’t bomb them in Syria. Putin did. #neverforget911,” she wrote on Twitter.
It was precisely because of her support for Assad and Russia’s war that Moustafa was keen for her to attend the congressional delegation to southern Turkey to meet the victims of the conflict.
“From experience, everyone that we bring over to the border, and they see the victims, they always come back with a realistic view of what’s happening and who is behind the mass displacement and killing and atrocities and so on, and so that was the objective,” he said. “What was shocking was her lack of empathy. She’ll sacrifice the facts, even when it came to little girls in front of her telling her they got bombed by a plane — it didn’t matter.”
For those that don't know, Tulsi grew up in a cult. An offshoot of Hare Krishna.
Yeah, the pro Assad war mongering is problematic.
I would say the pro-ISIS war mongering is a tad worse
Just came across a really incredible (for me) data point.
/
Moreno’s campaign and his GOP allies outspent Brown and his allies on the air, with $251.9 million in total GOP spending compared with $232.7 million in total Democratic spending on the race, according to AdImpact data/
Almost 500m in total for a Senate race when the presidential election iirc was below 3 billions?
President Trump won in a massive landslide. But somehow, magically, senate seats in swing states went blue in WI, MI, AZ, NV
How does that happen when typically people who vote Republican vote Republican down the board?
My prediction is wide spread election fraud will be made public before President Trump officially takes office.
Just came across a really incredible (for me) data point.
/
Moreno’s campaign and his GOP allies outspent Brown and his allies on the air, with $251.9 million in total GOP spending compared with $232.7 million in total Democratic spending on the race, according to AdImpact data/
Almost 500m in total for a Senate race when the presidential election iirc was below 3 billions?
Interestingly enough Moreno and Brown both mean "brown".
At least more people are sounding the alarm bells:
Tulsi Gabbard’s history with Russia is even more concerning than you think
Charles Lister, a senior fellow at the Middle East Institute who testified twice on Syria to the House Foreign Affairs Committee when Gabbard was a member, spent years debunking her various conspiracy theories about the war.
“
It'sa hoax dude. There has been precisely zero evidence produced that Tulsi Gabbard is a Russian asset, since Hillary Clinton first made the allegation several years ago.
The Trump Russia collusion hoax also instigated by Hillary Clinton (surprise, surprise). Another dud.
My advice fwiw, is that you should choose better news sources and try not to be so gullible.
President Trump won in a massive landslide. But somehow, magically, senate seats in swing states went blue in WI, MI, AZ, NV
How does that happen when typically people who vote Republican vote Republican down the board?
My prediction is wide spread election fraud will be made public before President Trump officially takes office.
More treason, military trials and hangings predicted without any evidence presented? Surprise, surprise.
President Trump won in a massive landslide. But somehow, magically, senate seats in swing states went blue in WI, MI, AZ, NV
How does that happen when typically people who vote Republican vote Republican down the board?
My prediction is wide spread election fraud will be made public before President Trump officially takes office.
I like how due to the disparity, you automatically think the senate seat votes were fraudulent and the presidential votes were not fraudulent.
I suppose if Harris won and the senate seats went red, then the fraud was in the presidential race and not the senate races.
Typical carnie diet logic at work here.