Higher of Lower: Random Edition

Higher of Lower: Random Edition

I'll make a false statement and you guys guess higher or lower. Same deal as the other game basically, except these will be totally random and they won't correlate to the question number at all.

I don't have a set of q's to ask, so this will be mostly just be whatever happens to come to my mind at the time. Let's say if you get to 10 in a row, you win!

1. Martin Scorsese and Robert De Niro have collaborated on 9 films together

(Note: they made a short film together in 2015 called The Audition, which I am not counting.)

) 1 View 1
14 December 2024 at 09:19 PM
Reply...

264 Replies

5
w


by D1iabol1cal k

Sorry, there's only 2781.

Anybody know who no 1 is? It might not be who you think.

I assume number one is part of a royal family ?


From my Indian coworkers, I heard it was an Indian follow who dumped a Bill$ on his son's wedding. Or something like that.


Musk is 1 as individual but Saudi Family is worth 1.4 trillion


by Dgoat k

I assume number one is part of a royal family ?

by Eric k

From my Indian coworkers, I heard it was an Indian follow who dumped a Bill$ on his son's wedding. Or something like that.

by Nicholasp27 k

Musk is 1 as individual but Saudi Family is worth 1.4 trillion

It's none of these (at least according to Forbes)


Well Forbes isn’t up to date on Tesla stock movement


Musk is #1 on the Forbes Real-time list, but I'm not too confident in the bottom of the list. It's lower either way.



Fair enough. I was using wiki, which had Bernard Arnault first.


1. New Zealand has a population of 5 million people


They have more sheep than people iirc


Do they have more than 5,000,002 sheep?


I can't check the Forbes Real-time Sheep List right now.


Would guess lower, but not very confident.


No idea

Did they get more people after LOTR films?


Higher

They win world cups!!!


As fat as game theory works on these I think people are reading too much into it.

D1iab sees the actual number for something and rounds it to the nearest 10/100/1000 etc whether it's up or down.


Would guess higher on this one based on how often it comes up in cricket commentary.


by xander biscuits k

As fat as game theory works on these I think people are reading too much into it.

D1iab sees the actual number for something and rounds it to the nearest 10/100/1000 etc whether it's up or down.

This.

by xander biscuits k

Would guess higher on this one based on how often it comes up in cricket commentary.

Do they really say "a nation of just over (or just under) 5 million" that frequently?


Pretty sure i've heard somewhere than AUS has 5x the population of NZ so does anyone know the population of AUS? If it's over 25M then i'd go higher


I feel like the five million number has been around for a while so higher on the theory they are still fertile there.


P sure Oz is like 50 million


Lets go higher


AUS 50M really? Maybe it was 10x not 5x then lol

Yeah higher seems the consensus


LMAO Australia is nowhere near 50 million.


by eyebooger k

This.

Do they really say "a nation of just over (or just under) 5 million" that frequently?

Yeah. It's always because NZ cricket team is being compared to India and the like


I vote higher

Reply...