uNL Quick Checkup Thread
Ok,so here is the deal.While skimming for the first time in my life through the Small Stakes Pot Limit Omaha forum i saw this thread made by jd_poker about a year ago http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/38/sma....
This is the post that explains what this thread is all about.
This works well in HUNL, see here.
Post all action, don't post results.
Post hands here that you are almost certain you played correctly but just need confirmation so you can get rid of that tiny little bit of doubt in your mind. Preferably these are hands that require a simple "wp", "good line", etc. kind of reply. Leave strat discussion to a minimum or it might make this thread very confusing if it does take off. Post only complete hand histories (without results). If replies seem to show that
Now,I don't know if this feeling is shared by many others but when I review some of my sessions,there are some hands that make me think,like jd said,that they don't require their own thread but on the other I would lreally like to get some feedback on them and hear other peoples opinions about the particular play etc.
I don't think the mods will agree with this thread,but at least I tried.
Happy new year!😀
5 Replies
Bump. This thread concept seems very useful.
2NL
130bb effective
Hero has AhKh
we raise to 4bb from UTG
BTN calls
SB 3bets to 12BB
We 4Bet to 40BB
SB 5Bets all in
We call.
SB had 6% PFR and no 3B (IIRC) over some 50 hands.
Opponent has the following stats over 100 hands:
VPIP 10
PFR 7
3bet 3
CBet 25
So basically they 3bet with QQ+ and AK, maybe some JJ, TT or AQs in there.
The raise roughly with TT+, AT+, KQ
They limp setmining with pocket pairs
And they cbet with Top pair +.
So this is a super transparent nit. Unless they are using some mixed strategy, or they have been dealt very bad hands. Even if they used a mixed strategy, they would have to be even tighter which would be even worse, like folding AJ in order to add 67s.
Would I be safe to call this a fish in addition to a nit? It just seems like we can't lose to this guy and we want to be in when they raise since their range is so predictable.
Used to hate these types of players since I wanted spewy fish, but now that I can see more subtlety in the games, I don't mind playing against these types of players. It just requires a very specific handling than regular fish.
Trying out uploading a converted hand and very basic spot check.
Just a basic raised aces, 3bet flop AI.
Spoiler
PokerStars, No Limit Hold'em - $0.02/$0.05 - 8 players
Player 1 (BB): $6.42 (128 bb)
Player 3 (+1): $4.16 (83 bb)
Player 4 (+2): $6.11 (122 bb)
Player 5 (MP): $3.59 (71 bb)
Player 6 (HJ): $5.98 (119 bb)
Player 7 (CO): $7.90 (158 bb)
Player 8 (BU): $5 (100 bb)
Player 9 (SB): $4.75 (95 bb)
Pre-Flop: ($0.07) Hero (francloco) is BB with A♦ A♠
phaphi2011 (+1) calls $0.05, cristianense (+2) folds, McCaico (MP) folds, SpeyFly_714 (HJ) folds, Takaianagi (CO) folds, walter0128 (BU) folds, ppockij (SB) calls $0.03, francloco (BB) raises to $0.20, phaphi2011 (+1) calls $0.15, ppockij (SB) calls $0.15
Flop ($0.60) 7♣ 9♦ Q♠ (3 players)
ppockij (SB) checks, francloco (BB) bets $0.45, phaphi2011 (+1) raises to $1.50, ppockij (SB) folds, francloco (BB) raises to $6.22 (all-in), phaphi2011 (+1) calls $2.46 (all-in)
Turn ($8.52) 7♥ (2 players, 2 all-in)
River ($8.52) 7♦ (2 players, 2 all-in)
Total pot: $8.52 (Rake: $0.43) (Cash Out Fees: $0.04)
Showdown
Player 1 (BB): $4.28 -$2.14 [A♦ A♠] (Cashed Out)
Player 3 (+1): $0 -$4.16 [Q♥ 9♥]
Player 4 (+2): $6.11 +$0
Player 5 (MP): $3.59 +$0
Player 6 (HJ): $5.98 +$0
Player 7 (CO): $7.90 +$0
Player 8 (BU): $5 +$0
Player 9 (SB): $4.55 -$0.20
PokerStars: $0.47 +$6.03
2NL
130bb effective
Hero has AhKh
we raise to 4bb from UTG
BTN calls
SB 3bets to 12BB
We 4Bet to 40BB
SB 5Bets all in
We call.
SB had 6% PFR and no 3B (IIRC) over some 50 hands.
P.S: Villain's raises increased from 6% to 11% over a couple of rounds. Mood changes, he's getting bored, or got badbeat at another table. If you are a fish when you tilt, you are a fish.
