** Official Spin and Go's Discussion Thread **
If players want to discuss these new 3 handed games on Stars, feel free to post in here. If we start to get a lot of res
Based on my flimsy math it seems that you are running about 10% below EV whereas I am running 20% below EV...
Honestly, running below EV doesn't bother me that much. It only really bothers me in that I have run below EV in every single format of poker I have played. What bothers me, as I said in the last post, is that I constantly lose big flips. Liken when I'm on the BB with 20bb effective, button raises, I jam and get called by Q-10, KJ, QJ etc. hands where I am slightly good. I lose these, am
The fock are you talking about 10% vs 20% rofl. You are less than 100 bins under ev and keep crying about that mate when I was close to 600 bins in that graph. Good luck when the shite really hits the fan.
The fock are you talking about 10% vs 20% rofl. You are less than 100 bins under ev and keep crying about that mate when I was close to 600 bins in that graph. Good luck when the shite really hits the fan.
You have an of EV 2,120,000 chips and have actually won 1,920,000 chips.
1,920,000 / 2,120,000 = .9056 or 90.56%
That means you have won about 91% of the chips you should have over that span of hands. Sure, itÂ’s over a much larger span than mine which is about 4,000 tournaments, but that doesnÂ’t change the fact that I have won 80% of the chips I should have and you have won 90%. Ie you have run better than me in relationship of EV to Chips won.
You have an of EV 2,120,000 chips and have actually won 1,920,000 chips.
1,920,000 / 2,120,000 = .9056 or 90.56%
That means you have won about 91% of the chips you should have over that span of hands. Sure, itÂ’s over a much larger span than mine which is about 4,000 tournaments, but that doesnÂ’t change the fact that I have won 80% of the chips I should have and you have won 90%. Ie you have run better than me in relationship of EV to Chips won.
Imagine having the gall to suggest you're running worse than someone running >500bi below ev over a sample 20x the size of yours because you've cherrypicked a ratio over your 4k game sample.
Ime has certainly had multiple 4k game samples with worse runs than you're having to wind up with that sort of graph.
If you want to succeed in spins, you have to do better than this. Absurd.
Imagine having the gall to suggest you're running worse than someone running >500bi below ev over a sample 20x the size of yours because you've cherrypicked a ratio over your 4k game sample.
Ime has certainly had multiple 4k game samples with worse runs than you're having to wind up with that sort of graph.
If you want to succeed in spins, you have to do better than this. Absurd.
First off, its difficult to tell what he has done because he posted a fragment of his chart. Second, based on what he did post, he is running about 20,000 chips below EV so I do not know how that equates to 500 buy-ins below EV.
Nevertheless, in one year (2024) or 7,141 tournaments, I ran 160 buy-ins below EV and I am doing it with more than double dude's CEV.
Define succeed in spins? is it succeeding to win money playing? Then I have succeeded. Or is it success to run well in CEV? I'm sitting at about 70 CEV at $10 level. The only thing I do not succeed at, in spins, MTTs, cash and sit-n-go is running anywhere near EV.
Ultimately I was able to make money despite running so poorly because of rake back and leaderboard bonuses. Since September the rake-back was slashed significantly and starting in the new year the leaderboard promo is gone. Without these perks, running as I do...
PSA to ignore the troll
https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/profi...
PSA to ignore the troll
https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/profi...
Cheers mate.
