Mental health lawyer, poker player, and gay schizophrenic
Hi all,
For those of you not familiar with my poker blog here, 1/3 Grinding and Bankroll, I started as a drunk tourist player the regs salivated over, playing sporadically for fun. Then life hit me with a baseball bat across the face and I was diagnosed with schizophrenia, but not before I had gotten my law license and started practicing criminal and post-conviction law. Poker gave me a way to pass the time and not give up on life, and eventually the hobby turned into a job and I went pro or semi-pro for several years. I did very well, playing in the biggest games in my room up to 100/200 occasionally but much more often the big live PLO5 games.
I just started my most recent full time law job as a mental health lawyer defending people like me, those with psychiatric disabilities, and I am starting another cool chapter in my life. Now that my poker volume has decreased by a lot again I thought it was a good time for this thread.
Ask away!
DT
DT,
Just wanted to thank you again. I spoke with my psychiatrist this morning and it went about as well as possible. She prescribed me 10 pills, which I can break in half and will last me another 3 weeks.
You are the ****ing man.
Schizophrenia is a big mental health issue. Most of those guys are unemployed or on dissability.
How you cope with schiziphrenia? How you cope with beeing gay? Since when do you know you are gay?
Do you take your medication? antipsychotics like apriprazol, risperdone and seroquel comes to mind.
Interesting thread to read. I have schizophrenia too or schizoaffective.. Currently on Abilify for it. Before that I was unmedicated for a long time... Question: do you still coach? Do you coach PLO6 as well?
Thanks
DT,
Just wanted to thank you again. I spoke with my psychiatrist this morning and it went about as well as possible. She prescribed me 10 pills, which I can break in half and will last me another 3 weeks.
You are the ****ing man.
Awesome! And I just won my second consecutive hearing! Good news all around.
Schizophrenia is a big mental health issue. Most of those guys are unemployed or on dissability.
How you cope with schiziphrenia? How you cope with beeing gay? Since when do you know you are gay?
Do you take your medication? antipsychotics like apriprazol, risperdone and seroquel comes to mind.
I think some psychiatrists prime their patients for less than their full potential which is a barrier to many of them seeking gainful employment. Some really cannot work but many could with the right circumstances.
My mental health issues are not really front and center anymore, I sorta consider it in remission at this point due to strict adherence to medication and other good life habits. For example I don’t read the news anymore. I eat well sleep well and exercise socialize etc.
As far as being gay I don’t feel a need to cope, raising children is a huge responsibility and I’m
not sure I will ever be ready for that. I’ve known since my teens around puberty.
Involuntary civil commitment hearing. These are civil proceedings where a hospital is asking a judge to commit someone to inpatient hospitalization against their will for treatment and their safety or the safety of others.
Involuntary civil commitment hearing. These are civil proceedings where a hospital is asking a judge to commit someone to inpatient hospitalization against their will for treatment and their safety or the safety of others.
You didn't agree with the hospital that treatment was in his best interest?
man i would really need you, i live in sweden though.
had two stints in the psych ward (locked up) 2022 and 2023.
got pretty bad psychosis that was drug and anabolic steroid fuelled.
now im forced to take depot injections of abilify each month because they claim i have a _serious mental disorder_ .
i keep on claiming that i don't ****ing suffer from some disorder, it was drug and steroid fuelled but no my doctor claims that im mentally ill.
each 6 months they can prolong their right to jab me with this horrendous medicine, and last court case or whatever you call it they decided to prolong it.
they have barely diagnosed me but they claim it is schizoaffective which here counts as a serious mental disorder.
in 3 months i will have another kind of court where a doctor looks at my case.
i REALLY want to get of this ****ing abilify because it has ****ed me up mentally and physically.
i work as a teacher right now and i have my life fully in check (kind off lol - im a pretty bad degenerate but I've been that way for 20 years lol)
what would you do for someone in my case that has showed a stable life for over a live to get of the meds?
Involuntary civil commitment hearing. These are civil proceedings where a hospital is asking a judge to commit someone to inpatient hospitalization against their will for treatment and their safety or the safety of others.
Do you ever not side with the patient and agree with the hospital that someone should be committed because they are a threat to themselves and others?
man i would really need you, i live in sweden though.
had two stints in the psych ward (locked up) 2022 and 2023.
got pretty bad psychosis that was drug and anabolic steroid fuelled.
now im forced to take depot injections of abilify each month because they claim i have a _serious mental disorder_ .
i keep on claiming that i don't ****ing suffer from some disorder, it was drug and steroid fuelled but no my doctor claims that im mentally ill.
each 6 months they can prolong their right to jab me with th
Honest question - where do you think you would be right now without the meds? You’re stable with a a job as a teacher right now because you are on meds
Involuntary civil commitment hearing. These are civil proceedings where a hospital is asking a judge to commit someone to inpatient hospitalization against their will for treatment and their safety or the safety of others.
You didn't agree with the hospital that treatment was in his best interest?
We advocate for our clients’ stated interests and for liberty when they cannot communicate their interests. That often means we are asking for them to be released from forced inpatient hospitalization against their will so they can go back into the community and obtain outpatient assistance.
There are occasionally cases where I am not sure I did what was in the client’s best interest health-wise but many of them absolutely hate being held in the hospital. It’s a terrible environment a lot of the time - patients screaming at night, poop on the floor, nurses checking on your room every fifteen minutes. No wonder so many want to leave I don’t blame them.
Involuntary civil commitment hearing. These are civil proceedings where a hospital is asking a judge to commit someone to inpatient hospitalization against their will for treatment and their safety or the safety of others.
Do you ever not side with the patient and agree with the hospital that someone should be committed because they are a threat to themselves and others?
Never. That would be unethical.
We advocate for our clients' stated interests and for liberty when they cannot communicate their interests. That often means we are asking for them to be released from forced inpatient hospitalization against their will so they can go back into the community and obtain outpatient assistance.
There are occasionally cases where I am not sure I did what was in the client's best interest health-wise but many of them absolutely hate being held in the hospital. It's a terrible environment a lot of the
You said you wanted to be a mental health lawyer to "defend" people like yourself. But you admit you advocate for the client's "stated" interest regardless of whether that's truly good for them. Would you consider it ethical to hand an alcoholic a beer because that was their "stated" interest?
And if a client can't communicate their interest, you advocate for "liberty"? Wtf does that mean. If a client can't communicate their interest, how can they even seek counsel of an attorney?
Be honest, don't bull **** me. After how many of your "victories," do the patients actually go to voluntary outpatient treatment? Can they even afford it?
In reality, you claim to "advocate" for the mentally ill. There's a reason the hospital needs to involuntarily commit something. They are a threat to themselves and the public. And you're "helping" them by allowing them to avoid treatment?
man i would really need you, i live in sweden though.
had two stints in the psych ward (locked up) 2022 and 2023.
got pretty bad psychosis that was drug and anabolic steroid fuelled.
now im forced to take depot injections of abilify each month because they claim i have a _serious mental disorder_ .
i keep on claiming that i don't ****ing suffer from some disorder, it was drug and steroid fuelled but no my doctor claims that im mentally ill.
each 6 months they can prolong their right to jab me with th
I don’t want to give legal advice for someone in a different country because I don’t know what the rules are there.
If you are doing well and stable on your meds I suggest sticking with them. I have been adherent to my meds for years and I owe my stability and success in poker and work in large part to taking them consistently. I really wish you well.
It’s hard to come to terms with having a serious mental health issue but the way I view it I am a stronger person because I am overcoming my diagnosis and thriving in spite of (and in part because of) my unique circumstances.
My meds cause side effects the worst of which is sedation but over the years I have gotten used to it. Perhaps you just need a medication with fewer side effects which you can discuss in consultation with your psychiatrist. Be well.
I want this thread to be a safe space where people feel free to be open without being attacked. Please keep it civil and respectful. If I think someone is crossing a line I will block them.
seems declining the job would be proper if you thought they should be locked up.
How would you feel if the client wanted to be free against the doctors wishes and you also know he’s a threat to society and then he ends up raping and murdering some good, innocent people who are productive in society? Trying not to cross the line here but I’m genuinely curious about the ethical dilemmas of a lawyer and this is an ask me anything thread
Holy ****. This makes Me question whether you should even be practicing law.
A client is entitled to straightforward advice expressing the lawyer's honest assessment. Legal advice often involves unpleasant facts and alternatives that a client may be disinclined to confront. In presenting advice, a lawyer endeavors to sustain the client's morale and may put advice in as acceptable a form as honesty permits.
It is not only morally wrong to hand an alcoholic a beer.
It is also unethical and violates your duty as a lawyer to blindly pursue the client's objectives, without giving them honest advice.
Your job is not to just "do whatever the client wants."
That's especially true when your client is mentally ill and has no ability to understand their true interests and needs.
It is utterly hypocritical for you to brand yourself as a "mental health lawyer and advocate" when you've admitted that you blindly follow the "stated interest" of your clients without critical feedback.
And even worse, despite all of the doctors who are testifying in court that your patient is a physical danger to himself and others, you fight to keep him out of the hospital so he can avoid treatment.
And you have the balls to call yourself a "mental health lawyer"? You advocate foe the mentally ill like bars do for alcoholics: You enable.
How would you feel if the client wanted to be free against the doctors wishes and you also know he’s a threat to society and then he ends up raping and murdering some good, innocent people who are productive in society? Trying not to cross the line here but I’m genuinely curious about the ethical dilemmas of a lawyer and this is an ask me anything thread
DumbosTrunk would consider this a "victory" because he allowed a violent, mentally ill person to pursue "liberty." He doesn't give a damn about the "liberty" of the woman he rapes.
From what I’ve read (a few times) over the years regarding mental health court, the patients have little to no rights and it’s more akin to a kangaroo court.
Essentially, judges side with doctors/the hospital quite often.
Would you say this is an accurate assessment DT?
Giving those who have little to no rights a “fair” or “more fair” hearing in mental health court seems like a noble pursuit and something you should definitely be proud of.