Karen Read Case
thought there was a thread this, posted this in OOT as well, has anyone followed this and been following this the past y
so you are saying the cops and some of his close friends did then(well jen was the closest one by far to him he didn't know 3 of the 7 there iirc and only met weekend prior ) in that house.
feel like if she DIDNT do it then most certainly you have to say she was framed. no other way because if she didn'tt do it then you believe when karen says he entered that house
personally im not sure if there is some sort of 3rd party besides the karen or the people in the house that really could have been involved realistically sems one or the other with everything given.
the hit by a plow truck thing seems has no legs
I would say the actually intact tail light is pretty compelling evidence that she's being framed.
Also all of the deleted phone calls.
Her acknowledgement that she hit him and her statement to the cops where she said it was her fault makes me suspect she's guilty. Whether she's convicted or not is another thing.
What topic would you prefer?
Also how the **** am I wrong please don't tell me that you think dogs aren't willing to eat people.
Her acknowledgement that she hit him and her statement to the cops where she said it was her fault makes me suspect she's guilty. Whether she's convicted or not is another thing.
How do you wrap your mind around the tail light stuff? Do you think she's guilty and they decided to try to make the case look stronger by breaking her lights?
That’s what one person said, Jennifer. but during the police cam, it was never heard nor was reported by cops that night. This is something that was contentious early on in the trial. I assume it would have been written down that night by police.
She did ask if she hit him one or twice iirc
How do you wrap your mind around the tail light stuff? Do you think she's guilty and they decided to try to make the case look stronger by breaking her lights?
Luckbox there is a ring camera where she backed up into johns car that same night and she said that’s when light broke. We see it on camera but there was never any pieces there. She claims that’s where it got broken off.
Pieces of taillight were found near johns body after the initial search and then days after.
The footage of them bringing the car into the shop was mirrored and then we see two police officers walll aroun frequently at the side it was hit.
No reason for the footage to be mirrored police said it was an accident
Some say she backed up into johns car that night just so camera could see it since it was planned
How do you wrap your mind around the tail light stuff? Do you think she's guilty and they decided to try to make the case look stronger by breaking her lights?
It's possible I guess although I doubt that. I was going to opine that maybe she did it herself, but see that the Pleasure already said this, covering the reasons.
the re trial early motons are being discussed, defense suposdly lost out by certain text messages between karen and someone else to be allowed in court, meaning this ws between her and amedia member or social media person
not sure what teh textx suggest but it has something to do about PR
was thinking about this case. knox case as well as the adnan syed (sp) case. maybe its hte case for A LOT of other murder cases but these cases have A LOT of smoke surrouding them, a lot of smoke, coincidences, changing of testimonies etc etc
its funny how a lot of these cases internet thinks they are not guilty due to beyond reasonable doubt even though occams raor and it "seems" likely what happened. very subjective to jurors thoughts and pickings
was thinking about this case. knox case as well as the adnan syed (sp) case. maybe its hte case for A LOT of other murder cases but these cases have A LOT of smoke surrouding them, a lot of smoke, coincidences, changing of testimonies etc etcits funny how a lot of these cases internet thinks they are not guilty due to beyond reasonable doubt even though occams raor and it "seem
Syed is guilty imo and Knox absolutely guilty without a doubt.
Jury haven't reached a verdict so far with Read, and will resume deliberations on Monday
Acquitted of all charges except drunk driving
I very much doubt she was framed. Hopefully she doesn't get herself in trouble again. Time will tell. My sympathies to the O'Keefe family.
looking back what's obvious at the time of the first trial is that , for some reason, in 2025, police investigation and evidence collection was bang on absolute sloppy and dogshit for the year we are in. which is insane to say in 2025.
Just sucks it wasn't a, b , c as it should have been. I know when the trial first when the feds were gonna look into details since the case from outside caused suspicion from them for internal. Just puts the jury in a tough spot
She may face a civil suit from the o'Keefe's. Personally, I suspect she got away with it
