Moderation Questions
The last iteration of the moderation discussion thread was a complete disaster. Numerous attempts to keep it on topic fa
Although I agree with your argument you made your points and now it's time to let it go. That's what is meant by over reacting. You kept it going a tick too long. This whole conversation took a terrible and regrettable twist. I say we get back to some moderation talk.
I’ll do power rankings now for which of you who participated in this convo I’d least like to encounter alone in the woods
I'm very handy if you're thinking of annoying a bear that you think is hibernating
Ooo
So I’ve been away for awhile…it sounds like we have new moderation? Are things better now?
Well I like it
I think you are grossly under representing how much rope permabanned posters have historically receivedPhresh doubled, tripled, and quadrupled down relentlessly before he was permabannedMets had to resort to IRL stalking to get perma'dPeople like Luciom have been banned double digit times and are still aroundThe reality is that anyone who is a regular poster on this forum would
didn't know the extent of it, we usually just see the one post
sad to know they took it that far
Don’t threaten me with a good time
You accidentally fell ass first into the answer. Why didn’t you list white people above?Because, similar to men, you are aware they are not an oppressed group. If a person of color generalized that white people are trash, I think you’d understand the sentiment at least to some degree and not assume they mean every single white person is garbage., but rather the structures that
Once again we have cultural marxism being used to justify bigotry
Coordi uses it for racial discrimination against asians
crossnerd seems to think its appropriate to make these comments as a mod but when someone fires back, hand out a ban. I just assumed its a joke to her because being bigoted towards the "oppressor" isn't harmful but in that case, if you're going to dish it out you should be able to take it as well. I guess when you're the "oppressed" it hits different
On a scale of 1 to this, how ignorant is it?
Disclaimer- I have not read or vetted other tweets from this account. This is not an endorsement of their entire twitter history or any future tweets. Sorry for your time but people are incredibly stupid, conspiratorial, and delusional
Once again we have cultural marxism being used to justify bigotryCoordi uses it for racial discrimination against asianscrossnerd seems to think its appropriate to make these comments as a mod but when someone fires back, hand out a ban. I just assumed its a joke to her because being bigoted towards the "oppressor" isn't harmful but in that case, if you're going to dish it out
I don't use cultural marxism for anything.
You literally don't even know what that means and you use it to define all the monsters in your incredibly insecure closet that probably has a bit of gay in it
I don't use cultural marxism for anything.
You literally don't even know what that means and you use it to define all the monsters in your incredibly insecure closet that probably has a bit of gay in it
We could roll the tape on how you clearly support asians being discriminated against when apply to get in to school. That is cultural marxism. Do I need to break out the crayons and explain everything to you?
Ok here's the cliff notes. Focus. Cultural marxism replaces class with identities. You give identities oppression rankings. The official rankings are done behind closed doors by people with green and purple hair. Now your oppressor vs oppressed games get played by using identity instead of class
Its interesting to watch you deny your use of cultural marxism when its your exact argument for discriminating against asians. It's also built in to the gender ideology you passionately defend. Its not a question of if you use cultural marxism, its if your eyes actually glazed over as you were being brainwashed
We could roll the tape on how you clearly support asians being discriminated against when apply to get in to school. That is cultural marxism. Do I need to break out the crayons and explain everything to you?Ok here's the cliff notes. Focus. Cultural marxism replaces class with identities. You give identities oppression rankings. The official rankings are done behind closed doo
Affirmative action died because of an investigation that found white people were getting preferred treatment. I lamented the irony in this. Finding that ironic isn't support for asians being discriminated against.... quite the opposite actually. I was lamenting that the people who filed the original case now have zero path to filing the case they did because it ultimately killed affirmative action. I mean, thats text book irony.
You give identities oppression rankings. The official rankings are done behind closed doors by people with green and purple hair. Now your oppressor vs oppressed games get played by using identity instead of class
brainwashed
unironically
We could roll the tape on how you clearly support asians being discriminated against when apply to get in to school. That is cultural marxism. Do I need to break out the crayons and explain everything to you?Ok here's the cliff notes. Focus. Cultural marxism replaces class with identities. You give identities oppression rankings. The official rankings are done behind closed doo
The goal of Marxism is to eliminate class.
What you're really saying is that anything where an oppressed or discriminated group identifies itself and rebels is a form of Marxism.
It's a piss- poor use of the term "Marxism", but the compliment is probably a good definition of reactionary.
The goal of Marxism is to eliminate class.
What you're really saying is that anything where an oppressed or discriminated group identifies itself and rebels is a form of Marxism.
It's a piss- poor use of the term "Marxism", but the compliment is probably a good definition of reactionary.
the goal of marxism is to substitute the dominant class in capitalist society with a clerical class Marxists represent. like most ideologies, it's about taking power for the people promoting that ideology.
cultural Marxism is applying Marxist oppressor-oppressed narrative not to economic class, but to ethnical/gender/sexual preference identities.
classic Marxism seeks to get power by harnessing the envy and hatred of losers in an industrial society (unskilled labour) to overthrow dominant capitalistic elites and substitute them with intellectuals who studied Marx.
cultural Marxism seeks to get power by harnessing the envy and hatred of losers in a post industrial society (fake job paper shufflers and people with master degrees and PhDs who barely get by on low yearly wages) to overthrow dominant cultural elites and substitute them with previously failed intellectuals who studies intersectionality.
Marxism isn't about a group that itself feels losing and tries to get something back.
Marxism is about siding with it as if the existence of losers proved immorality is happening, under that absurd misconception that the only moral outcome in society is if every subgroup in society has the same outcome (which is clearly impossible as we aren't bees).
it's not cultural Marxism to identify that some group has worse outcomes.
it is to take it's side (more technically, to strongly pretend to while only having reaching power as a goal) inherently because they are losing.
non Marxism is when even if you identify losers, you realize that means they are playing worse at the game of life under the circumstances so if you had to side with someone, those would be the last people to side with.
The goal of Marxism is to eliminate class.
What you're really saying is that anything where an oppressed or discriminated group identifies itself and rebels is a form of Marxism.
It's a piss- poor use of the term "Marxism", but the compliment is probably a good definition of reactionary.
Reality isn’t a blank slate. Group identity has a primary aim to preserve itself. A Marxist group is subordinate to this aim, which is why the oppressed group (or emergent members) will always keep the ring of power once acquired. Always.
“The goal of Marxism is to eliminate class.” -> The goal of Marxism is to acquire power.
Edit: Luciom beat me to it.
Reality isn’t a blank slate. Group identity has a primary aim to preserve itself. A Marxist group is subordinate to this aim, which is why the oppressed group (or emergent members) will always keep the ring of power once acquired. Always.
“The goal of Marxism is to eliminate class.” -> The goal of Marxism is to acquire power.
Edit: Luciom beat me to it.
This is why I say a unifying national identity, which transcends smaller group identities, is mandatory.
Even then, a unifying national identity is only a temporary solution.
The universal self is the final group identity. It’s the only group identity which can break the grip of group identity. Yet, it counterintuitively requires this hop of ever larger group identities in order to get to it.
