TPTK with BDFD OOP 3way vs flop raise

TPTK with BDFD OOP 3way vs flop raise

£1/£2 8 handed NLHE

Table is a mix of loose and tight players. Hero moved from another table 45min ago and has been playing standard tight. Possibly seen as passive post flop.
V1 on UTG+1 brown guy mid 30s, tight/nit player, mostly unnoticed. Don’t remember him going to any showdown so far.
V2 on MP Chinese guy early 30s, playing fairly aggressive/straightforward TAG, has been involved in a few pots.
Hero effective stack with £200. Both Villains cover.

Hero sees AKcc on BB
V1 raises to £7, V2 calls, Hero raises to £30, V1 and V2 call

Flop Ad Th 9c (£91)
Hero bets £55, V1 raises to £155, V2 folds, Hero?

25 April 2025 at 08:35 PM
Reply...

8 Replies


Earlier posts are available on our legacy forum HERE

We're probably never folding with such stack size.

If we were deeper stack(400+), I can find a fold.

I'd snap call/shove this pot to stack ratio.

In order for me to fold, we need some good reads. Ie. villain never raises flop without 2pair+ etc.


We’re quite committed and he can have the same hand. We have some backdoors as emergency outs.

Like above poster said if we were 400 deep we can exploit the nit and fold.


by yoshi02

£1/£2 8 handed NLHETable is a mix of loose and tight players. Hero moved from another table 45min ago and has been playing standard tight. Possibly seen as passive post flop.V1 on UTG+1 brown guy mid 30s, tight/nit player, mostly unnoticed. Don’t remember him going to any showdown so far.V2 on MP Chinese guy early 30s, playing fairly aggressive/straightforward TAG, has been inv

This is definitely too small preflop, at 100bb I would be going at least 5x here oop with one dead caller. Since its live poker I would probably go even bigger and only use a linear range bc of its very likely we get at least one caller. As played on the flop I think we are just committed when we choose this size at this stack depth. I could also see a lot of incentive to go for the xjam with your combo instead of cbetting. I’d rather cbet AA or TT bc these hands need less protection and generate too much fold equity through a check raise.


Grunch:

PRE - 3B larger, at least 35, but 40 isn't out of line.

FLOP - check from OOP or over-bet jam. This 1/2 pot c-bet into two opponents is too large, and we're not deep enough to play a multi-street game with this sizing.

As played, either fold or jam. No point in calling off 155 when we'll only have 15 left. Think V has a ton of 2P combos here. He could have some draws, too. So I think we're somewhat indifferent between fold or jam.

With such a low SPR, I think we're supposed to stack off with TPTK, so I'd lean towards jam, even though I'm somewhat expecting to see V roll over 2P.


Ok I can see the incentives to check OOP 3way and jam on a bet, but if it checks through given Vs can have quite a lot of draws, that is quite bad for us no? If we were heads up are we checking as well or cbetting here?


If you check as the preflop 3-bettor on an ace-high flop, it probably gets checked through a lot.


Easy all-in as played, SPR way too low to give up on TPTK with nut flush draw after putting in 40% of stack.


I also like a 3bet to £35 at least. As for the flop, either a check or a small cbet seems fine.

by monikrazy

Easy all-in as played, SPR way too low to give up on TPTK with nut flush draw after putting in 40% of stack.

[ ] nfd

Reply...