Value of Equity Denial

Value of Equity Denial

I was exposed recently to the idea that we can make bets with hands that don't quite meet the equity threshold for a value bet, if we are denying enough equity from villains as well. It seems like the common way to think about a value bet in a very raw sense is if you have >50% equity vs the range that calls your bet, it would be a profitable value bet, however I know this doesn't always apply. OOP on the river for example (obviously there is no equity left to deny) , I know we can block bet hands with less than 50% equity but I had assumed that is just because checking is lower EV relative to IP where we close action, so I don't think it is quite the same thing.

I have been looking at some multiway sims lately, and the idea of equity denial has been very prevalent so I am looking for a better way to quantify what the "value" of equity denial is in these contexts, but also heads up. I know there are a ton of factors leading to the final strategies but I'm looking to understand this part a little better conceptually, thanks.

09 May 2025 at 07:06 PM
Reply...

5 Replies


Earlier posts are available on our legacy forum HERE

What are you using to look at multiway sims?


Rocketsolver


EDIT: sorry i don't know what i'm talking about


If pot on the turn is 10bb and you fold out hand that has 15% of equity vs you. If you check you win 8.5bb, if you bet you win 10bb. So there is extra 1.5bb in ev even if you fold out weaker hands and that covers up ev you lose to the better hands. When you are IP on the river, you dont gain anything by folding out weaker hands (they have 0% equity).


https://saulocosta.poker/11-the-3rd-reas...

Reply...