Moderation Questions
The last iteration of the moderation discussion thread was a complete disaster. Numerous attempts to keep it on topic fa
The confusion is part of the modding strategy. Keep the rabble on their toes
Well, there's boring substance and there's interesting substance. Yours fits in the boring category imo.
But keep trying though. One day you might get there.
Rather than continue this exchange, let's just leave it to others to judge our respective contributions to the forum.
yes but about 50% and again only for a specific part of the country, the rest of which is majority christian so even if that region is muslim, they are still part of a greater non-muslim society and again and again 50% is nothing even remotely close to a monoculture and you're not religitarded so it's obvious that you're just posting in bad faith
your username deeply implies you are a middle eastern immigrant so i think this is a little close to home for you plus you didn't like me beforehand so you'll happily lash out with nonsense in this instance if you think it means getting one over on me
If someone wants to de-green me, I give zero ****s.
As for your inability to put me on ignore, I'm sure you can tough it out. I haven't put you on ignore even though you never post anything that is remotely interesting, and I'm doing fine.
it astounds me how much oxygen you waste engaging with people like bj
cut the mods a little slack, they're still sore about the end of apartheid south africa
yes but about 50% and again only for a specific part of the country, the rest of which is majority christian so even if that region is muslim, they are still part of a greater non-muslim society and again and again 50% is nothing even remotely close to a monoculture and you're not religitarded so it's obvious that you're just posting in bad faithyour username deeply implies you
and again, given my travels in middle east and north africa - other people who've been always have this conversation with me
i have not met a single woman who felt safe unescorted in those countries - best case scenario is they get a little light groping
public gang rapes of unescorted women are so common in egypt that it has its own wikipedia page
can you say all egyptians are evil? no you can't
if you're going to push a button and it cures all diseases and rids the world of war and hunger but arbitrarily kills someone but you get to choose the country that person dies in then egypt and other middle east/north african nations is going to be a strong candidate for consideration
I see mongest came over to join his friends mong and monger and complete the unholy Trinity. One mongy essence, three distinct accounts.
Seriously, why are all 3 of the nut lowest posters here posting in this thread today? Is this some sort of scheme to give everyone brain cancer?
i have not met a single woman who felt safe unescorted in those countries - best case scenario is they get a little light groping
public gang rapes of unescorted women are so common in egypt that it has its own wikipedia page
can you say all egyptians are evil? no you can't
Very tempted to throw some gasoline on this fire and say the thing you guys hate
There's probably a kernel of truth to this, but also I don't remember people here saying that 35 million Christians should be terrorized or that they're afraid of Christians because they're all terrorists, or anything comparable to the level of casual anti-Islamic bigotry that's on display here.
Yeah there has, but biases run deep, and we all have them.
Even in this lightly moderated forum, these could potentially get modded here. Roc?
... Muslims should be spayed and neutered
... Bump this thread every time a shitty Muslim dies.
... Advocating droning Muslims (from a dude who his also scared of Muslims, go figure)
...Every Muslim is a ticking time bomb to murder an innocent child.
...Help me find a way to dox my neighborhood Muslim.
That took 5 mins.
I'm not even against curtailing that type of behavior, i'd prefer to let people post and show who they are. But ideology is a hell of a drug. But more importantly trolly, I think it's dangerous to not notice when your own team is doing it. It's certainly played a hell of a role in the politics that we have now.
Seems that our government is as good at silencing stories as it is at everything else, since I distinctly recall reading it on the front page of BBC news.
More generally, what is the mechanism via which governments silence stories in countries which have freedom of the press?
from the freaking Guardian, from 2014
Perpetrators
The majority of the perpetrators were described by victims as being Asian. The inquiry found that several staff described their nervousness talking about the race of the men "for fear of being thought racist". Others remembered clear direction from their managers not to do so.
Councillors did not engage directly with the Pakistani community to discuss how best they could jointly address the issue, and some seemed to think it was a "one-off" problem.
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2014...
there was a systemic cover up of the phenomenon for many years, obscene countless raping of British children by Pakistani people, but ofc you deny the cover up because many years later after hundreds of thousands of group raping and tens of thousands of pakistani being implicated a small portion of those monsters get prosecuted and the matter is publicly discussed.
keep in mind that every single member of the Pakistani community who knew this stuff was going on and didn't report it to the police is also personally responsible and an accomplice in the crime.
it's hard to believe any pakistani Person in those communities is innocent. That includes all women who knew one or more of their man relatives was implicated in this and didn't denounce it.
it was one of the biggest scandals in western history. an epic proportion example of why unfiltered immigration is horrible and disastrous for our countries, the clearest possible proof leftists are heinously wrong on the topic and the right is obviously right on the topic, and that's why all efforts were made by leftists everywhere in government and law enforcement (at the local level especially) to delay the reckoning of the complete failure of their immigrationista model as much as possible.
and to this day you guys deny letting those low education Pakistani in was basically a crime against the British people. and making them British was adding insult to injury .
a country that abdicates to it's most basic responsibility, the safety of the weakest people in society, by letting in huge amounts of low education people from incompatible cultures with utterly different values , and then when presented with the predictable results of those disastrous choices, the mass raping of children beyond any number ever seen domestically by western people, a complete denial for many years that it was even happening because admitting low quality people from low quality countries are incredibly more propense to commit obscene crimes is somehow "racist"
I have no idea what this stream of consciousness verbal diarrhea is supposed to demonstrate. Hole in wan claimed there was a cover up to prevent reporting of these cases by the media. He has provided no evidence of this, and neither have you. In fact, you just cited a ****ing article from the media on this very issue in support of some other point.
Do you honestly think that people here are so stupid that one guy says "there was a cover up in the media", someone else asks "what cover up?" and you can swan in and claim there is some different cover up by someone else and nobody will notice that's what you did because you used the words "cover up"? You're either really stupid or really dishonest or both to try that ****.
I'm not even saying there wasn't a cover up, by the media or anyone else. I was just asking that other dumbass to show some evidence in support of the claim. That offer extends to you, if you can stop frothing at the mouth about brown people raping everyone long enough to make a coherent point.
there was a cover up of the existence of the very gang rapes, which started in the 90s, and got discussed only 15+ years later.
there was a cover up of the fact that it was mostly about Pakistani people doing the raping, as per link I provided.
it wasn't about "the media", it was the people who supposedly should have protected the British girl from the Pakistani rapists who preferred to be empathic with the Pakistani, to avoid "racism", disregarding the fact that mass group raping (and other horrors) was systematically happening against British girls by Pakistani men.
I don't care what hole in wan exactly said as I don't have to defend claims made by someone else, but given a massive cover up (by law enforcement, social services and so on) happened on that very topic, I think it was proper to strongly repeat how horrific that was and how much being "anti racist" actually translates in putting your country population at risk of the most heinous events possible.
that said thousands of people were involved and each and every one of them should have his livelihood destroyed, and that didn't happen.
every single person who dismissed the topic and didn't do his job in full when it was possible to prevent further raping should pay for it
there was a cover up of the existence of the very gang rapes, which started in the 90s, and got discussed only 15+ years later.there was a cover up of the fact that it was mostly about Pakistani people doing the raping, as per link I provided.it wasn't about "the media", it was the people who supposedly should have protected the British girl from the Pakistani rapists who prefe
Alright then, so, the media didn't cover anything up and no stories were suppressed, which is the only ****ing thing I was challenging. Got it, you've been very helpful, thanks.
Also, your buddies mongy and mongier were claiming that cover ups are happening right now, not in the 90s. I mean, I get that you are just itching to go off on a full blown tirade about the brown menace, but at least try and keep track of what the conversation is actually about.
your username deeply implies you are a middle eastern immigrant so i think this is a little close to home for you plus you didn't like me beforehand so you'll happily lash out with nonsense in this instance if you think it means getting one over on me
Ah so that’s it. In fact I’m an English Uker and have no particular gripe with you other than I think you talk a lot of shite, most of the time.
My username is my favourite Indian (Nepalese in fact) dish, another example of you talking shite.
But more importantly trolly, I think it's dangerous to not notice when your own team is doing it. It's certainly played a hell of a role in the politics that we have now.
What "team" are you talking about? What are these alleged posts you found, and what is their significance supposed to be? I'm not going to answer for every post that any yahoo has made here over the course of decades. I could just as easily ask you to justify an average Karl post.
Fact is, the previous long-term mod of this place was openly a Christian, and you're trying to tell me he was bigoted against Christians in the same way that the mod here thinks it's cool to terrorize Muslims? Absurd.
