Moderation Questions
The last iteration of the moderation discussion thread was a complete disaster. Numerous attempts to keep it on topic fa
True incels shouldn't have to be virgins.
"Celibate" isn't defined that way. It just means not having sex for some period time not permanently or ever.
I think it has to be for a pretty extended period of time. Otherwise 90% of men would be considered involuntarily celibate for a good part of their lives.
Of course the word 'incel' also implies that they're angry about it and it usually leads them to hating women.
Call it whatever you want, but Kingsley Amis certainly wasn't the first person to express that view. In fact, it is an ancient idea. In The Republic, Socrates talks to an old man named Cephalus who says: "When the desires cease to strain and finally relax, then . . . it is possible to be rid of very many mad masters."
I thought he was referring to the first part of the post, about men only wanting to be around other men to share their vices.
If male desire is such an uncontrollable and impulsive force of nature that overtakes your agency, then maybe men donβt belong in positions of leadership.
That would be true if not for the fact that men in positions of generally can have sex as often as they like without expending much effort.
I know. It was like watching an NBA game with all the foul calls. The timeout thing was ridiculous. She likes to threaten bans as well. She has already mentioned that she is gonna get me again someday so I just avoid were she dwells mostly.
Best not to dwell on the past, and move on.
I actually agree with this. I wasn't quoting the idea for truth. I simply was noting that it didn't originate with Kingsley Amis.
Amis had for much of his life a very strong and rather misogynistic sex drive (score at all costs), which all too many women were all too ready to indulge, and his son Martin wrote that he made a profession of adultery. In old age, after his second wife left him, a friend asked if he ever regretted losing his first wife due to his behaviour, and he replied, 'Only all the bloody time.'
You say “indulge” as if women aren’t ****ing for pleasure too

[/url]
I came across this dog today and asked its owners if it was a pomsky and they said it was and wanted to know how I know about pomskies-- which is an interesting question to consider but I just told them I'd met one before in Ohio.
Adorable dogs. Always (2/2) super friendly and the only dogs I ever get down on my knees to meet
i think it's wild that we're praising the thoughts of a philandering dandy who grew up rich and never had to work a day in his life who believed in jewish space lasers and was an active communist who was team stalin until the secret speech and then when i give a data driven post on the prevalence of single women and incels it's outright implied that i'm a horrible monster who if left alone in the woods with would do far more horrible things to you than a bear would
I guess if just lowered my standards…
You kinda seem like a guy who wouldn’t do well at camping tbh
I still think you’re short and ugly based on vibes :p
I heard that rickroll has been having to beat away the women of Seattle with a stick just so he can have some time available to play poker.
i'm not posting anything out of line and even if you believe that to be the case - it's all grounded in genuine data so you should refute the data or at least how it is interpreted - not just "you must be a gross person"
you just scream that the sky is falling and you'd rather be mauled by a bear than alone in a room with any random guy whenever you see any inconvenient data points
and again, you were fine with people lauding the ideas and merits of an utter pos who thought the jews were out to get everyone but then have the nerve to say i am short, ugly, & can't be trusted alone with a female simply because i showed some very well known data gathered from online dating sites that show the sexual asymmetry in action
i'm not posting anything out of line and even if you believe that to be the case - it's all grounded in genuine data so you should refute the data or at least how it is interpreted - not just "you must be a gross person"you just scream that the sky is falling and you'd rather be mauled by a bear than alone in a room with any random guy whenever you see any inconvenient data poi
Interpretation and analysis of data is mostly a guy thing.
'You're icky' is about all you're likely to get from a woman.
π
Okay we've established all men are scum, CN hates men and Luckbox owns a dog...can we move tf on?
Blitz is ******* miserable. I've always hated the concept of losing on time in chess. I understand the need to have a clock so someone doesn't sit there until Yellowstone explodes, but the very idea of losing a game of chess because of a clock even though you've played better strategically/tactically is an absolute abomination to me. Completely undermines the game.
Lots of games
I'm quite aware of the first thing, but I don't agree that the second thing is always true. It CAN be true, but I think it's bad that it has to happen (for both the winner and loser) - in other words, I think it's a flaw that one side felt rushed and the other side only gained an advantage by time. I don't think time should play ANY part in the game (simply my preference).
We dont live in Yemen or Afghanistan where women are regarded as little more than cattle and sold off at a young age with no say in the matter. If men in free societies are institutionally scum, then that is because what women have chosen for.
Even in the highly patriarchal societies listed above, there undoubtably has to be some level of female buy in and positive reinforcement at the institutional level or the system wouldn't function.
Great highly patriarchal societies, move on as institutions, got it now can we move tf on?