Moderation Questions

They’re searching the area for him, he’s not in custody.

Not sure where I’ll go to hike and be alone now. I really enjoyed this particular spot and they just rehabbed it. I spent a lot of time there by myself. Now what?

This is America - isn't the usual recommendation to take a gun? Doesn't sound too relaxing though.

1. I never attacked you personally. I have attacked your antisemitic posts.

2. I also often "Like" your posts.

3. What reg other than me attacks fewer people than me.

4. I also 100% agree with your view that part political parties in the U.S.A. are beyond awful.

5. I could be delusional and I'm not chill at all.

Any weapon I take can easily be used against me in a physical struggle

Good point.

That's one of the drawbacks of carrying a weapon. I'm happy we don't have widespread gun ownership.

Luciom was a moralist to the extreme. (Which isn't to say that we agreed with his putative morals.)

Lucy often spoke in moral terms, even literally calling specific policies "immoral."

The Nazis also had ideas about what was moral and what wasn't (that most people disagree with). Merely using the word "moral" doesn't make someone a moral person.

I couldn't agree more.

But CN said that Lucy "advocated for amorality", which I was pointing out is demonstrably false.

I'm sure CN realizes that, but she doesn't care. (Which, of course, is her prerogative.)

Prerogative

Ok, but he literally defined “moral” as “anything that’s good for me and my family”

So Luciom was banned for arguing for free speech absolutism?

Can a mod confirm that arguing for this is now verboten?

In order to fight the Nazis the mods have been forced to become what they hate.

Tough burden for you guys.

Thanks!

I knead to wurk on my speling.

No he doesn't. You claim Hamas is justified in launching rockets from acual refugee camps, as vic has, then you're not advocating morality and any condemnation he then engages in re dead civilians and kids is obscenely hypocritical. He uses such things purely as a pragmatic tool. His stanning for Putin's Russia further highlights how he doesn't advocate morality

I think we can all agree it is very bad taste to silence someone and then speak for them in what can be characterized a disingenuous manner.

I am pretty confident you would not have responded well to such an action when your activity level was higher than the occasional random misandric drive by.

In my opinion this isn't really a fair comparison.

A Politics Forum is not a Free-Speech Zone.

We are all guests here of the moderators and owners of 2p2.

As King Spew said, I'm sure it was a lifetime achievement award and not a response to a specific post.

“Power is not a means; it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship. The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power.”

But I think he extended that definition to include what's morally right for society-at-large.

nazism is when no Italian guy that posts 60 times a day

Pretty sure anyone who opined over-and-over that women are evil and are as dumb as rocks would get a perma.

You can start doing that when women start randomly stabbing men in the face without provocation while at the ****ing park