Moderation Questions
The last iteration of the moderation discussion thread was a complete disaster. Numerous attempts to keep it on topic fa
my post was directed at corpus, who I dont think is Jewish as far as I know. I was just applying his own criteria to himself. there is nothing about Jews in that post.
anyway, I am well aware that you are just amusing yourself and you understand that your words are frivolous and open to challenge. you cant use sound arguments but can only intimidate and disconcert.
I’ll let the audience decide whether or not you were trying to compare Jewish Israelis to nazis in your post.
And nice bad faith strawman, I said I posted that particular post to amuse myself at the absurdity of crossnerd acting high and mighty about comparisons between Jews and Nazis, and it wasn’t in response to your post asking me to back up my claim. It also had the added bonus of serving to show how deserving of mockery you are.
You really are shameless in both your antisemitism and bad faith argumentation.
My family is Jewish. But we’re lefty Jews so sure, yeah, we’re probably secret antisemites at our cores. We just love antisemitism, we’re so happy!
Idiot.
Your family is Jewish therefore you can’t render support to antisemitism is an insane statement. It’s like saying Candace Owens can’t help racists because she’s black.
I'm driving. I keep writing posts but deleting them.
Did anyone else figure out if they have a heritage or if it's something anyone here besides Crossnerd cares about?
But yes I think the obsession people can have with bloodlines, ethnicity, race, ancestors, whatever a heritage is supposed to be, etc, is weird and it does feel very much right wing to me, but I can leave out the part about Nazis if Crossnerd or anyone else wants to try to have a civil discussion.
JFC
Is this a gd contest for worst posting possible?
I think he's having some sort of episode. Just no idea what sort.
If properly understood as a claim about metaphysics, he is saying that if slavery didnβt happen he wouldnβt exist. But thatβs just to say that as a contingent entity, if any of the contingent facts that led to his existence were not true, then he would not exist.
However where his point is not true is that he doesnβt owe EVERYTHING he is to slavery. He also owes it to all the other contingent (minimally) facts about the causal order that led to his existence.
I'm driving. I keep writing posts but deleting them.Did anyone else figure out if they have a heritage or if it's something anyone here besides Crossnerd cares about?But yes I think the obsession people can have with bloodlines, ethnicity, race, ancestors, whatever a heritage is supposed to be, etc, is weird and it does feel very much right wing to me, but I can leave out the p
Right. I know you can’t be obtuse enough to not understand why people desire to know where they come from.
Why do you suppose adopted children often look for their birth parents as adults? It’s the same reason the African American diaspora wants to know about theirs, and it’s NOT because they are obsessed with racial purity.
The analogy is literally one of the stupidest things I’ve ever heard in my life, and coming from you that’s quite the feat. I have a harder time believing your incapable of grasping that concept as opposed to you willfully being ignorant to it, and making this a whole thing.
The history of the North America, and indeed most of human history (but especially North America which never really had any long lasting "peaceful" civilizations), is just a long unbroken chain of what you call genocide. And "native" in the way you use it is just the second to last group to control an area before someone with low melanin took over.
Obviously liberal society today can strive to be better. But creating ahistorical ideological myths where 'whites" are some pernicious evil and "natives" have some innate moral superiority is not only not true; but doesn't any productive purpose.
I'm curious-- if you guys had the chance to go back in time and eliminate the African slave trade, would you do it if that meant also eliminating 95% of black people in America and putting the percentage of blacks on par with say Argentina?
Of course not, but he isn't arguing that. He is arguing liberal Jews (and more generally western liberals) give true bad faith antisemites too much oxygen, and allow their empathy to be weaponized against them. To no good end.
The Hamas run Health Ministry and sympathetic NGO personnel are not good faith actors. So liberals accepting their false narratives at face value, when most evidence disputes it, creates more harm than good. Even if liberal empathy is well intentioned.
This is not my work, and no I donβt have to tolerate a user repeatedly calling me a nazi. Be so ****ing for real.
it's not your work - but for years certain mods have given the green light to call others nazis and fascists despite never posting anything in support of either - usually saying the "grow up and toughen it out"
see srm's f your feelings post
so a lot of people are going to relish the fact that now that the tables are turned and it's a mod who is being called that - it suddenly is a big deal to be called such a thing and perhaps it shouldn't be allowed
The history of the North America, and indeed most of human history (but especially North America which never really had any long lasting "peaceful" civilizations), is just a long unbroken chain of what you call genocide. And "native" in the way you use it is just the second to last group to control an area before someone with low melanin took over. Obviously liberal society t
if you look deep into USA Indigenous History ( native is racist here in Canada ) there were many tribes and they fought against each other a few tribes were the most evil raiding other tribes and killing most in the most inhumane ways. It doesn't make it right but indigenous folks are the most discriminated people in North America

