Is The Epstein Pivot That Big A Deal
How much of the original allegations are actually now denied? Is it not possible that the only thing that has changed is
This **** is coming from a bound book made over 20 years ago.
But yea, deep state fake for sure. I mean the Trump one. Not the Clinton one, thatβs real.
Trumps only two known actual friends in life are Roy Chon and Jeffery Epstein. Roy was a known sexual deviant, who died of aids, and Epstein is a known sex trafficker. Maybe my parents were wrong and you aren't similar to your two closes friends.
But it doesn't matter... because it's obviously all a hoax. Like every other investigation into Trump, it's just a "witch-hunt", to bring this fine man down.
GOP leaders shrug off Trumpβs possible note in Epstein birthday book -
Trump continues to call the Epstein investigation a βhoax.β
CNN Panelist Says Ghislaine Maxwell Lawyer Just ‘Admitted’ Secret Trump Deal Live on TV
Trump’s Claim Birthday Book Signature Is ‘Fake’ Crumbles:
I gotta say this is one of those "you can't make that **** up" things imo.
I mean the text is so weird I can't think of any reason why someone who wanted to fake something like this would do it this way.
Come to think of it, I can't think of a reason why Trump would do it this way, either. It sounds a bit like an ad; maybe from a TV ad at that time, or maybe something he promoted?
obv Trump didnt write the letter himself. he payed someone to do it for him.
Trump is such a developmentally disabled child he can’t even draw symmetrical tits
He’s a proven big fan of the word ‘enigma’ tho
He knows words. He has the best words.
Does anyone actually think Donald J. Trump knows how to use Microsoft Word well enough to create this himself and center the text?
Also, is that an em dash I see there? Do we know what ChatGPT was doing on or around the date this letter was "leaked" to the press?
Exactly. It's not like billionaires have secretaries who can use a word processor.
I'm not sure, "His secretary made it" is the desired headline here.
...AUTOPEN?!
i like how the best defense these morans can muster is "my man is way too dum to have done this". good stuff
His secretary typed the letter by transcribing what he said and printed it off for him to sign like he does with hundreds of other letters. He then drew the chick and signed the letter.
The fact you think Trump dictating a letter to his secretary is ridiculous and the more plausible theory is the Democrats dictated this letter to AI and sent if from Epstein's estate means you could be quite literally reetarded.
I didn't think it needed to be said that I was joking in the first post, but you guys might be in too deep.
I'm also apparently the only person on this forum who knew the contents of this letter came out several months ago. You can confirm this at your leisure by asking ChatGPT or whatever your preferred chatbot is. While you're there, make note of the excessive use of em dashes.
Man just shut your suckhole you walking fleshlight
I didn't think it needed to be said that I was joking in the first post, but you guys might be in too deep.I'm also apparently the only person on this forum who knew the contents of this letter came out several months ago. You can confirm this at your leisure by asking ChatGPT or whatever your preferred chatbot is. While you're there, make note of the excessive use of em dash
I'm also apparently the only person on this forum who knew the contents of this letter came out several months ago. You can confirm this at your leisure by asking ChatGPT or whatever your preferred chatbot is. While you're there, make note of the excessive use of em dashes.
Everyone knew the letter came out--I'm pretty sure the news recently is the original being turned over to Congress/released or whatever.
The letter was leaked by NYT or WSJ or something like that a few months ago and all the cope at the time was that it was completely made up.
So now its back around because the Epstein estate gave the letter to Congress
Of course all the weirdos are STILL trying to say its made up even though its coming from the family who has owned the bindings for decades
The sad thing its way more likely that Trump ****ed kids than it is likely for a Trumper to admit that he might have ****ed kids
I am sure no one is claiming that it is unlikely that Trump ****ed 16-17y girls that pretended to be adult (stop the kid nonsense pls).
What is highly implausible is that Trump knew minors were forcibly taken against their will to be used as sex slaves and then participated in that willingly (which is the actual pedo-ring theory of Epstein criminal undertaking).
But i mean the topic polls well for democrats, and when the by-elections are done in the next few months the house could have the votes (with 1-2 republicans) to mess with Trump on this so it's reasonable for you guys to keep pushing on this nonsense, pretty sure the right would do the same in reversed roles.
At least you are learning how to play the game.
I am sure no one is claiming that it is unlikely that Trump ****ed 16-17y girls that pretended to be adult (stop the kid nonsense pls).What is highly implausible is that Trump knew minors were forcibly taken against their will to be used as sex slaves and then participated in that willingly (which is the actual pedo-ring theory of Epstein criminal undertaking).But i mean the to
Lol at "16 isn't a kid..." and "they pretended to be adults..." and "he didn't know Epstein's secret even though he brought up they had secrets together in his letters to Epstein..." and "this is nonsense."
What a dipshit.
The good ol' "she wasn't a kid, she was almost out of puberty"-defense.
The letter is creepy as hell, and in the context of having been sent to a sex-trafficking sadist it is damn well incendiary. Add to the pile that Trump is a rapist, has uttered statements that reveal an unhealthy view about young girls, has paid for prostitutes and that it seems like every government branch this administration has influence over has been weaponized to bury his involvement, and I'd say the discussion should move on. It shouldn't be be about whether to light the pyre, but rather about who gets to do it.
Obviously, since Trump has become conservative America's favorite firebrand, the preferred arena for this isn't reasonable discussion, but rather an imaginary court wherein philosophical skepticism teaches us that nothing can be conclusively proven. Therefore, they argue, Trump must be absolved. Anyone who argues the contrary is somehow either brainwashed or politically motivated.
I don't know what the **** Trump was doing partying with Epstein and writing creepy letters. Nor do I know what the outcome of these revelations will be will be; sexual assault, sex-trafficking and rape of minors is tough enough to prove even when cases are fresh and the participants are on (somewhat) equal footing in the courts. However, there isn't anything surprising about this letter... and that in itself is damning to an extent that is difficult to put into words.
The letter was leaked by NYT or WSJ or something like that a few months ago and all the cope at the time was that it was completely made up.So now its back around because the Epstein estate gave the letter to CongressOf course all the weirdos are STILL trying to say its made up even though its coming from the family who has owned the bindings for decades
Trump probably even brags about it in private.
I am sure no one is claiming that it is unlikely that Trump ****ed 16-17y girls that pretended to be adult (stop the kid nonsense pls).What is highly implausible is that Trump knew minors were forcibly taken against their will to be used as sex slaves and then participated in that willingly (which is the actual pedo-ring theory of Epstein criminal undertaking).But i mean the to
I personally don't find it implausible at all.
And a 16 year-old is a kid (i.e. not an adult)


