The murder of Charlie Kirk
The murder of Charlie Kirk
8
zs

The murder of Charlie Kirk

Can we all admit that the majority of extremism is coming from the left over the last handful of years?

Apparently they j

10 September 2025 at 06:58 PM
Reply...

3851 Replies

8
zs


by coordi m

Yeah you are just disingenuous

This guy will just make up positions to argue against then get mad that people didn’t watch 2000 hours of Charlie Kirk footage to get the real context. He’s hopeless.


by coordi m

He literally said 3 successful and well qualified black women “didn’t have the brain power” and stole from “more deserving white people”. Now that’s verbatim.

You can’t justify that type of language as “not seeing race”

I mean you can try but you look dumb af doing so

Hear is what he exactly said

If we would have said three weeks ago […] that Joy Reid and Michelle Obama and Sheila Jackson Lee and Ketanji Brown Jackson were affirmative-action picks, we would have been called racist. But now they're coming out and they're saying it for us! They're coming out and they're saying, "I'm only here because of affirmative action."

Yeah, we know. You do not have the brain processing power to otherwise be taken really seriously. You had to go steal a white person's slot to go be taken somewhat seriously.

So if you tell us that your an affirmative action pick that means you were selected because of your race not just based on your SAT scores . So in reality you stole a persons spot more likely if it was Harvard an asian person .

I will agree his choice of words you do not have the brain power is stupid


by knivesout m

I don't think they framed the shooter, I think they are framing the "roommate" in order to wage war on the LGBT community. They were hoping the shooter was LGBT before they caught him, and then when they found out he wasn't, they made up the roommate to make the shooter look like they had ties to the LGBT community. It's also possible that everything about the roommate is tru

So they are going to risk jeopardizing the case, (Tylers charges) to frame the roommate, use terrible choice words in order to make it look believable, and do so in a manner that doesn't even credibly implicate the roommate?

If he said "my immortal bliss" instead, is that more or less likely to be setup?


by coordi m

He literally said 3 successful and well qualified black women “didn’t have the brain power” and stole from “more deserving white people”. Now that’s verbatim.

You can’t justify that type of language as “not seeing race”

I mean you can try but you look dumb af doing so

It was women who *explicitly* said there were where they are because because of positive discrimination


by Luciom m

It was women who *explicitly* said there were where they are because because of positive discrimination

If we would have said three weeks ago […] that Joy Reid and Michelle Obama and Sheila Jackson Lee and Ketanji Brown Jackson were affirmative-action picks, we would have been called racist. But now they're coming out and they're saying it for us! They're coming out and they're saying, "I'm only here because of affirmative action."

Yeah, we know. You do not have the brain processing power to otherwise be taken really seriously. You had to go steal a white person's slot to go be taken somewhat seriously.

As you can see, he said he knew it BEFORE they made pro-affirmative action statements.


by Luciom m

It was women who *explicitly* said there were where they are because because of positive discrimination

K


by knivesout m

I don't think they framed the shooter, I think they are framing the "roommate" in order to wage war on the LGBT community. They were hoping the shooter was LGBT before they caught him, and then when they found out he wasn't, they made up the roommate to make the shooter look like they had ties to the LGBT community. It's also possible that everything about the roommate is tru

I doubt they would have thought it necessary to fake the texts in order to assign blame in the way you describe. The right wing derposphere was happy enough to do that without the texts.


by Rococo m

I doubt they would have thought it necessary to fake the texts in order to assign blame in the way you describe. The right wing derposphere was happy enough to do that without the texts.

I think it would allow the idea that LGBT people cause mass shootings to go from a mostly online derposphere to a more mainstream audience, aka the types of people who watch network news but aren't completely entranced in MAGATland. The mainstream media has been trying as hard as possible to mention the roommate was trans at every chance they get. It's almost comical. Someone watching the press conference and taking the conversation at face value could easily start to believe the trans panic.

This is so when the genocide starts, the public will have even less empathy for LGBT people, and will struggle with the optics of helping the people behind "so many shootings like Charlie Kirk's".


by checkraisdraw m

This guy will just make up positions to argue against then get mad that people didn’t watch 2000 hours of Charlie Kirk footage to get the real context. He’s hopeless.

Maybe I think there should be actual proof before someone is labelled a racist. Not just that they are on the right and a couple of our of context quotes from a person that openly debated a wide range topics and policies.


by Shifty86 m

Maybe I think there should be actual proof before someone is labelled a racist. Not just that they are on the right and a couple of our of context quotes from a person that openly debated a wide range topics and policies.

Brother I just caught you outright lying (or being a ****** who can’t read) about someone’s position on whether or not someone’s murder was bad. I think you should take several seats chief (as they say on the twitters).


by checkraisdraw m

Brother I just caught you outright lying (or being a ****** who can’t read) about someone’s position on whether or not someone’s murder was bad. I think you should take several seats chief (as they say on the twitters).

Great arguments!! I never lied, tell me why do you think he was put on leave?


by Shifty86 m

Great arguments!! I never lied, tell me why do you think he was put on leave?

I think he was put on leave because the cult of Kirk can’t stand any criticism of their sacred cow, just like they accused the BLM movement of a few years back. So they harassed some random cop. Enjoy the canceling euphoria while it lasts, because when it turns around it will turn with a vengeance.


by checkraisdraw m

I’m not angry. I’m calling you a ****** because you consistently misquote people while getting mad at other people misquoting. And it seems like you misquote people because you actually can’t read. The word “sympathy” wasn’t even in the text of what was said. You actually just can’t read and yet are trying to do Kirk hermeneutics because you’re part of the cult of Kirk. Again

Shifty why did you ignore this post showing that you directly lied about what he said? Can you retract the lie that he said that we shouldn’t show sympathy for him?


by knivesout m

I don't think they framed the shooter, I think they are framing the "roommate" in order to wage war on the LGBT community. They were hoping the shooter was LGBT before they caught him, and then when they found out he wasn't, they made up the roommate to make the shooter look like they had ties to the LGBT community. It's also possible that everything about the roommate is tru

I think they're more unframing the roommate for cooperation. But maybe not just with the shooting. They've said lots and lots and lots of radicalization took place and they have evidence. The FBI has mentioned a broader probe. So maybe they need the roommate to testify against some group, movement, organization or whatever.


by checkraisdraw m

I think he was put on leave because the cult of Kirk can’t stand any criticism of their sacred cow, just like they accused the BLM movement of a few years back. So they harassed some random cop. Enjoy the canceling euphoria while it lasts, because when it turns around it will turn with a vengeance.

Strange world you live in. You think it's a cult because people are upset that someone who was just murdered is being slandered as a racist by his political opponents?


I’m curious what shifty would even consider racism


by checkraisdraw m

Shifty why did you ignore this post showing that you directly lied about what he said? Can you retract the lie that he said that we shouldn’t show sympathy for him?

Shut up. I messed up and typed sympathy rather than empathy, same difference.


by coordi m

I’m curious what shifty would even consider racism

I'm curious how you can call this person racist.


by Shifty86 m

Strange world you live in. You think it's a cult because people are upset that someone who was just murdered is being slandered as a racist by his political opponents?

I think it’s the cult of kirk because we’re not even allowed to point out his flaws without being told we are happy he’s dead.

by Shifty86 m

Shut up. I messed up and typed sympathy rather than empathy, same difference.

No it’s not. You tried to make it seem like he said Charlie Kirk deserved no sympathy when the plain reading of what he said is that Charlie Kirk and the Republicans are not winning any empathy competitions, and used examples of that, such as their glee when Pelosi’s husband had his head bashed in.


by Trolly McTrollson m

A. It seems like exactly the kind of cringe thing a 22-year-old would say.B. You expected the brain-pilled Mormon dipshit who decided to carve inscrutable memes onto bullets and murder a podcaster would write like a perfectly normal human being? This is Deuces 9/11-grade idiocy, next you'll be posting yootoobes and telling me it's scientifically impossible for a human to make t

Trolly are you still hurting because you can't win a debate vs. me? We've been talking about 9/11 for a long time over 2 threads. I can't recall one intelligent or insightful challenge you ever made to me or any fellow skeptic - not a single one. All you ever did was quote back stuff that it seemed like you lifted off an Ari Fleischer press conference.

You don't have to agree with me on 9/11. You can think that KSM hasn't been convicted because the authorities have been biding their time for 24 years. But to try set my arguments as the standard for stupidity in this place is just desperation beyond what any person should be suffering. You don't have to do this to yourself. You can just accept the truth of the situation and the obvious implication that we are ruled by people who constantly and harmfully lie to our face. I know you don't want to live in that world. None of us do. But to not live in that world you have to come to terms with what it is first. You're not going to deny your way out of where you are.


by checkraisdraw m

I think it’s the cult of kirk because we’re not even allowed to point out his flaws without being told we are happy he’s dead.

.

I was allowed to remember people that his extremist takes on abortion (actual extremism, 10% of americans agreeing with him and 3-4% of europeans, no abortion allowed ever no exceptions) were bad when talking with maga people and no 1 treated me like an enemy or a monster.

A decent bunch actually agreed that MAGA would be stronger if it allowed first trimester abortion no question asked, and people do remember Kansas (a very red state) shitting on the faces of abortion extremists recently


by TheKnight00 m

That is not the case. The young Turks recognized the danger and unpopularity of cancer culture/wokeism. They are now warning Democrats to not go down that route again. To return to supporting working class policies like universal healthcare, addressing college debt. Enough of the culture wars. There’s nothing wrong with left-wing and right wingers coming together on numerous i

Welp that didn’t take long to change.



by checkraisdraw m

I think it’s the cult of kirk because we’re not even allowed to point out his flaws without being told we are happy he’s dead.

You're not pointing out his flaws. You are slandering and trying to label him a racist because it upsets you that A LOT people have sympathy for someone being murdered that is your political enemy.

by checkraisdraw m

No it’s not. You tried to make it seem like he said Charlie Kirk deserved no sympathy when the plain reading of what he said is that Charlie Kirk and the Republicans are not winning any empathy competitions, and used examples of that, such as their glee when Pelosi’s husband had his head bashed in.

Why are you lying and leaving out he called him an open racist? It was in plain reading.


by checkraisdraw m

Welp that didn’t take long to change.

and the secret that no one could have thought of except her is... that is was... the jews!


by Shifty86 m

You're not pointing out his flaws. You are slandering and trying to label him a racist because it upsets you that A LOT people have sympathy for someone being murdered that is your political enemy.

Ah ok, so it’s not alright to call him a racist but you lying and saying I called him a racist is ok? I haven’t said he’s a racist at all, I just said you would have to watch 2000 hours of video to get the correct context to conclude he’s not a racist just has a very bad communicating style. Once again your braindead reading comprehension kicks in.

Also notice how you are lying that I am mad people have sympathy for him? I said the person that refused to print out a poster for his vigil was rightfully fired, and I’ve shared instances of unhinged reactions that I said were unacceptable. You’re just a ****** that can’t read dude, sorry.

Why are you lying and leaving out he called him an open racist? It was in plain reading.

I am convinced that you’re just not even reading what I said, because that’s a nonsequitor.

Or again maybe you can’t actually read.

Reply...