The "LOLCANADA" thread...again

So are you not speculating on something I would say or do when in fact I have never said it or shared it ? When I do it its disgusting when you do it.........

LMAO. Buddy it's just objective fact that you whataboutism endlessly day in and day out. I didn't say you would have whataboutismed about this specific thing, but the fact that you will shortly give us another whataboutism is more predictable than the tides.

If you look at the Charlie Kirk thread it’s not stop whataboutism. It’s only when the other side me does its it’s wrong
. I have strived to not do it and I think done pretty good job

Typical lefty outraged when I speculate on something I think you would say but when you do it it’s all ok .
The difference is I admit my mistake and apologize you defend your actions. Maybe in 24 hours you will reflect and apologize

It's not "whataboutism". You made an argument that paying for an optional service with an option for financial assistance is a tax, then claimed without taxes paying for public school we wouldn't have Dr's or nurses. I was simply pointing out that politicians waste tax dollars all the time and people don't say we should have used that money for more Dr's. I was showing your argument was silly, not whataboutism.

LMAO. Bringing up 7 year old minor trudeau era stories is VINTAGE whataboutism buddy.

If you don't want to call charging parents for basic public education service a "Tax on parents" because it isn't literally a tax well fine, but I'll expect you to duly call out every conservative who calls any type of government regulation or charge a "Tax" when it isn't literally a tax as well.

Regardless, I have no idea why you are being snotty. It sucks for parents that they have to pay these additional fees I don't in BC. Not sure why you are shilling for this.

Buddy, you literally JUST did a whataboutism. Saying "whatabout this other thread?!??! whatabout these other people?!??!" That's a whataboutism.

Whenever YOU are faced with a criticism you say WHATABOUT something else. And you just did it again in the very post you tried to claim that you strive not to do it. One sentence earlier.

I legit don't think you even notice or recognize this pattern in yourself, but you do it constantly.

Lozen been proved and admitted that 1 wrong (or whataboutism) is equivalent to 100 wrongs .

Regardless being on ethical, judicial , political , media, scientific issues it doesn’t really matter .

All is the same .

I can not believe Carney hasn't dumped his public safety minister yet. His latest faux pas getting recorded saying the gun registry is bad than coming out and say I misspoke and its a great thing

Tells you alot why politics is so hard . You must tow the party line

Carney recognizing Palestine horrible move . Id prefer more if he said We will recognize Palestine if they meet the following conditions instead of outright saying you recognize them but never say all the conditions and yes there is a difference

Did you read or listen to the full rational on Palestine? It’s actually very balanced. Firstly, it’s a move in tandem with peer countries like the UK and Australia etc, not just a random thing Canada is doing alone. Secondly, all the statements are full condemnations of hamas and are in no way apologizing for them or considering them part of the future. It’s phrased very much as like trying to build international pressure so after the war in Gaza there still retains the possibility of a two state solution. You basically can’t please anyone on this topic, but it’s not bad imo.

Hate to agree with the blue haired gender studies professor but he's right. It's a far more balanced take than just ''we recognize Palestine as a state''. Was actually quite pleased by the statement.

lol at Pablitos endless hallucinations about me

I said Id prefer if his statement was We will recognize Palestine once they meet the following conditions not WE recognize Palestine and by the way if you read our press brief only if they meet the following conditions

Lets be clear they are never meeting those conditions

Was Hoping Carney would save the 400 ostriches but nope sad our liberal commies are killing them

The point - made clear not just by Carney but by all the countries that made the tandem move - was to keep the door open in the future for two state solution. Maybe it will "never happen". Maybe diplomacy and multilateral engagement from the international community of countries like the UK and Canada won't ever make any difference. But I think it is at least reasonable to try and take small, symbolic, steps to keep that dream alive. Because who knows, maybe one day it IS possible to have a two state solution. Certainly the status quo is intolerably bad.

Woo Hoo the ostriches got a stay 😀

isn't it just standard practice to cull bird flocks that test positive for avian flu? Not quite sure why this has become a bugaboo of the right - like is it just because ostriches are bigger than chicken where it happens all the time as part of like noncontroversial best farming practices? Really not been paying attention to this story it seemed like a nothing burger.

These animals are not raised for consumption unlike chickens. The owners offered to pay for testing the whole flock .

Does that matter? Isn't the risk not from humans eating it, but that avian flu would spread to other birds? In the same way with over a dozen dead it presumably spread through the entire ostrich flock? Like again I don't really care about this issue at all, if the courts want to overturn I'm 100% ok with that too, feels like a pretty classic legal dispute, but I just find it weird this is become some like wedge political issue.

Well, the issue is that the farmers asked the Trump administration to intercede on their behalf, which they have done. And the Trump administration even offered to transfer the birds to Florida to live out their lives.

So now it has become a partisan issue, and the Canadian govt is coming off as attempting to needlessly murder the pet ostriches just because they can.

That would require a liberal to admit they are wrong or made a mistake and we all know it’s not possible . Even Uke has proven that

This 750 million being wasted on a gun buyback what a joke I thought this would be another dumb Trudeau policy he would scrap but nope

“Liberal admit they were wrong”. This is the NDP provincial government. More specifically it is a completely non-partisan health and safety focus ministry within the provincial govetnment that ROUTINELY issues cull notices when animals test positive for diseases. No farmer wants to do this, but most understand the risk to the system makes it required. These birds a surely should have been culled IMMEDIATELY after testing positive and a dozen died. The reason it is now controversial is only because they refused for so long that the birds have transitioned to likely being fine, but that of course would be terrible policy if it became allowed to just refuse orders until the danger passed and then never have to cull.

But lozen demonstrates precisely why I find it ridiculous this case is political. He turns around and tries to blame the liberals? Like **** man that isn’t even the right jurisdiction or party. This is entirely a matter for courts to resolve now!

Agreed on guns. The guns should absolutely be banned, but zero dollars back. However, they are following the successful Australia model with buybacks and it does make sense that this increases compliance.

2 birds died

Carney doesn't even know what guns are on it as he spouted hunters do not need AR15's when in fact 10 and 12 gauge shotguns are on the list .
Even his own minister is on the record saying this is a bad policy and that police will struggle to enforce

Alberta , Sask and Ontario refuse to participate and stats confirm that the majority of crimes committed with a weapon are an illegal weapon . The crimes that Justin reduced charges for

Aghh the days when Justin added a Black Rifle coffee to the list