The murder of Charlie Kirk
Can we all admit that the majority of extremism is coming from the left over the last handful of years?
Apparently they j
Lol? Charlie Kirk and Trump think/thought the national guard is needed in all major US cities right now because they are so violent.
Yes. The inner cities are over run with crime and soft on crime DAs and judges have led to many many un needed deaths and unsafe environments for regular citizens.
You seem stupid as absolute ****
They just regurgitate whatever fox news feeds them.
when those people will publish online videos of comedy with no executive action against them, will the psychotic crazies whining currently admit there is no violation of the 1a, or will they disregard the fact that those people are actually allowed to speak?
No, they will never admit anything that counters their narrative.
(Same for 'psychotic crazies' on the Right ofc)
#bothsides
No, they will never admit anything that counters their narrative.
(Same for 'psychotic crazies' on the Right ofc)
#bothsides
All three sides. Left, right and the absolute morons that use both sidesism as an excuse after the right completely flip flops on what free speech means on a dime.
He did not. He paid for buses of people to attend the Jan 6 riot and plead the 5th to the House committee. He could have told the truth after the election that Trump lost because he preformed poorly as president and got way less votes than his opponents but he chose to lie for money and influence. While others were killed beaten and jailed for acting on his and others lies.
Well, that’s nothing compared to the many brutal violent BLM riots in the summer of 2020. Upwards of 20 people killed many injured billions of dollars worth of damage. This is what the left-wing media does they keep on bringing up January 6, which is literally a drop in the water compared to the BLM riots which saw numerous attacks on government institutions btw.
Of course there was violence against police officers on January 6. But the left is losing on this one every time, simply according to common sense and the facts. And the numbers not a single January 6 protester actually killed anybody. The only one who died on that day was the pro Trump Ashli Babbitt.
all of these people who keep on saying “show the proof show the proof of how left-wing cancel caution was so bad” What the hell? Do they forget sports teams renaming their team to suit a left-wing agenda. Do they forget the BLM slogans on the backs of players names. Do they forget the mask mandates. Do they forget the Fact that Facebook, YouTube another social media Deplatformed major right wing influencers, including Donald Trump while doing nothing about left-wing people who said white people are privileged.
How about the Seattle CHOP zone. An insane display of left-wing propaganda and violence where they literally took over a section of the United States. If people died there too. Can you show a single example of right wingers taking over a section of the country for days on end people dying?
How about left-wing Fanatics screaming at right wing speakers on College campuses even attacking them attacking people like Riley Gaines for speaking out against men playing in women’s sports. There is nothing like that that exists when it comes to the right wing screaming at or shouting down or attacking left-wing speakers on college campuses.
And not to mention of course, the destruction of historical statues across America by the left . Statues of People like Christopher Columbus, St. Louis, many more utterly destroyed by criminals during the BLM riots. Is There is a single case of a right winger destroying a statue of some black person or a Jew who owned slaves is there. Even going to other countries are Africans destroying statues of Mansa Musa? No they are not nor should they because these types of people whether they were white or black were a part of history.
It is incredible that some left-wingers continue to go down this route of saying oh the right wing was worse compared to the left when it comes to cancel culture or political violence . Wow they’re never gonna win another election if They keep that up. Charlie Kirk pointed all of this out.
All three sides. Left, right and the absolute morons that use both sidesism as an excuse after the right completely flip flops on what free speech means on a dime.
I think Trump, Republicans and Democrats are all inexcusable.
I'd be astonished if there are more than half-dozen Congresspeople who sincerely care one whit about the welfare of their constituents.
This mf snowflake is crying about Christopher Columbus statues.
US birth rate declined dramatically from 16.7 per 1000 in 1990 to 14.1 in 2001, with a further dramatic and fairly continual drop ever since, so you'll inevitably see a decline in violent crime, on account there being fewer young men around to commit most of it. This is a common factor across Western societies.
Yes and I think Trump, Republicans, Democrats and you are all inexcusable. That you dont have the cognitive abilities to tell the difference between different groups well enough to make specific criticisms on them does not excuse you.
Why are right wingers not rioting after the murder of Charlie Kirk? I mean you look at the George Floyd situation which is not even really comparable to Charlie Kirk. As you have had people from all sorts of racial backgrounds saying wait a second, George Floyd was super high on drugs on that day and resisted arrest which led to his death. Bottom of line these are big-time differences between the deaths of both people, and yet no rioting from the right wing when it comes to the aftermath of Charlie Kirk.
Either way what an ugly time in American history for the left-wing. Going from being the party of John F. Kennedy the party of the working class to their disgraceful BLM riots in the summer of 2020. Causing billions of dollars worth of damage, destroying historical statues, killing upwards of 20 people injuring many destroying so many businesses, including black owned businesses. All in the after math of George Floyd. What the heck?
Again, you have Charlie Kirk murdered While speaking at a college campus, allowing for people who disagree with him to question him. Compare that to insane left-wing who literally shouted at and screamed down Riley Gaines and attacked her for saying men shouldn’t be allowed to play women’s sports.
Well, that’s nothing compared to the many brutal violent BLM riots in the summer of 2020. Upwards of 20 people killed many injured billions of dollars worth of damage. This is what the left-wing media does they keep on bringing up January 6, which is literally a drop in the water compared to the BLM riots which saw numerous attacks on government institutions btw.Of course there
You completely (and likely deliberately) miss the point on both of your comparisons here.
January 6 was far worse than any riots in other cities in 2020 not because it caused more deaths or destruction, but because it
1 - was an attempt to prevent the transfer of presidential power
2 - was encouraged by the current president, Donald Trump
To make things worse, now Trump has pardoned all of those acts of treason.
On your other point, about "cancel culture", what is happening now is far worse than any of your examples of people on the right being cancelled, because the cancellation has been directed by the president and his appointees.
Unless you didn't realize these differences, your entire long post was made in bad faith and complete dishonesty.
If somehow you hadn't realized the differences, and that those differences are why everyone who isn't a toady for Trump complains about those things, you have now had it explained to you.
Really?
Well, that’s nothing compared to the many brutal violent BLM riots in the summer of 2020. .
So Charlie Kirk and MAGA's excuse is the violence and riots we 100% caused is not as bad as violence we brayed on about for months to our low intelligence followers. If I believed what idiots like Kirk did, I'd be pretty sure not to cause a riot where people get killed and cops get attacked. Yet he couldn't even clear that incredibly low right wing affirmative action bar.
File this Under: Instructive Moment
You are a perfect example of a bad-faith poster:
1. I ask (in good-faith) who you are talking about?
2. You respond by calling me a 'moron.'
3. I point out that your post was right after mine and you didn't quote the post you were responding to. Normally, a post that doesn't quote another post is responding to the immediatly prior post (which in this case was my post on an unrelated subject to yours)
4. You post a dumb meme.
Ergo, you are a maroon and a bad-faith poster.
But I can be a maroon sometimes too, so I get it.
I dare you to try to find one incidence of me defending DEI, or even saying one slightly positive thing about it.
You're a betting man, right? How much would you like to wager that you could find an incidence of that?
You defend Jackson hire into supreme court right? Whether she is qualify or not doesn't matter because Biden made that pledge that basically a DEI hire.
Why are right wingers not rioting after the murder of Charlie Kirk? I mean you look at the George Floyd situation which is not even really comparable to Charlie Kirk. As you have had people from all sorts of racial backgrounds saying wait a second, George Floyd was super high on drugs on that day and resisted arrest which led to his death. Bottom of line these are big-time di
So, you're comparing the deaths of George Floyd and Charlie Kirk, while also saying they're not comparable.
Yes, there are big differences between the two. Well, at least one big difference.
Charlie Kirk was murdered by a lone crazy person in an isolated incident.
George Floyd was killed by law enforcement agents who used excessive force, and was seen as part of a larger pattern of black men being killed by police.
Again, you have now been educated on the difference between these two incidents, and why they have had different types of reactions. Please don't make the same mistake again, or your dishonesty will be made perfectly clear.
US birth rate declined dramatically from 16.7 per 1000 in 1990 to 14.1 in 2001, with a further dramatic and fairly continual drop ever since, so you'll inevitably see a decline in violent crime, on account there being fewer young men around to commit most of it. This is a common factor across Western societies.
https://www.ppic.org/publication/are-you...
The violent felony arrest rate for young adults (ages 18–22) dropped by more than 50 percent over the last 25 years, from 1,712 per 100,000 residents in 1994 to 840 in 2019.
The drop is even more notable as the rate for adults in their late 30s and older increased over the same period. This steep decline is the driving factor behind the most recent shift in the age-crime curve. After representing about 25 percent of violent felony arrests among adults for decades, young adults now account for 16 percent of these arrests. →
We see reductions in violent criminal offending beginning with individuals born in the early 1990s. For those born in 1993 and later, the violent felony arrest rate is 20 to 25 percent lower than in previous generations.
That's from California so we could see the opposite from Chicago or wherever but the CA numbers seem to be the overall trend.
Some rural shot up a bunch of police serving a warrant in a domestic violence case Wednesday. Not getting much attention due to race/culture of the shooter.
