The murder of Charlie Kirk
The murder of Charlie Kirk
8
zs

The murder of Charlie Kirk

Can we all admit that the majority of extremism is coming from the left over the last handful of years?

Apparently they j

10 September 2025 at 06:58 PM
Reply...

3851 Replies

8
zs


by TheKnight00 m

Ok that point is understood. And even an objective look into the very point being made shows us that there are many concerns with regards to how January 6 was even allowed to happen in the first place. From Nancy Pelosis of handling the situation to videos literally showing us police officers ushering January 6 protesters around the Capitol hill building.And when you look at ac

What if I told as much if not more of the violence and rioting was from right wingers and opportunists specifically set out to incite

In fact, there is literally zero evidence showing that violence and rioting was concentrated within left wing individuals

In fact, there is actual evidence that it was right wingers and opportunists


by TheKnight00 m

That’s a rare take^ I guess say anything to justify your incorrect position?

What’s my incorrect position? That Candace is a joke and people only watch her because it’s a dumpster fire/train wreck?


by coordi m

What if I told as much if not more of the violence and rioting was from right wingers and opportunists specifically set out to incite

In fact, there is literally zero evidence showing that violence and rioting was concentrated within left wing individuals

In fact, there is actual evidence that it was right wingers and opportunists

Id say your full of it. All those right wingers posing as trannies . Sure


by coordi m

What if I told as much if not more of the violence and rioting was from right wingers and opportunists specifically set out to incite

In fact, there is literally zero evidence showing that violence and rioting was concentrated within left wing individuals

In fact, there is actual evidence that it was right wingers and opportunists

the "actual evidence" is leftists creating leftist definitions to compile leftist databases that show that leftists are good.


by checkraisdraw m

What’s my incorrect position? That Candace is a joke and people only watch her because it’s a dumpster fire/train wreck?

Some people actually think she is the real deal.

*never underestimate the enemy*


by coordi m

What if I told as much if not more of the violence and rioting was from right wingers

This is why you can't reason with liars and tards.


by Luciom m

Some people actually think she is the real deal.

*never underestimate the enemy*

You'd think the leftists would jump on the the Israel/CK narrative since they all protest against them. Funny how they're silent on the subject.


by lozen m

Id say your full of it. All those right wingers posing as trannies . Sure

by Luciom m

the "actual evidence" is leftists creating leftist definitions to compile leftist databases that show that leftists are good.

by BGnight m

This is why you can't reason with liars and tards.

This is how right wingers respond to factual posting that defies their sensibilities

"You are lying, they are lying, everyone is lying"

you guys are lying to yourselves


by Luciom m

Some people actually think she is the real deal.

*never underestimate the enemy*

I’m sure many take her seriously, but I don’t think the spike in her viewership is because of that.

by BGnight m

You'd think the leftists would jump on the the Israel/CK narrative since they all protest against them. Funny how they're silent on the subject.

CK was a huge Israel guy. The idea he was about to blow the lid open on TPUSA is preposterous and only being promoted by people who swear they have evidence but can’t provide a single shred of it.


by coordi m

This is how right wingers respond to factual posting that defies their sensibilities

"You are lying, they are lying, everyone is lying"

you guys are lying to yourselves

You call "factual" lists compiled with very arbitrary definition by people who agree with you to begin with.

You should accept the fact that everytime something isn't 100% objective, every time there is *any* discretion on the side of compiling data, we do expect complete malfeasance by your side.

Like your side is actively evil and it does spend entire careers to make up stuff that doesn't exist.

So when a list is compiled about what is a rightwing assassination and what is a leftist assassination, if the people writing it arent' rightwing, i can bet my liferoll against 1 dollar that it is a bad faith list with intentional mislabeling.

And the ADL list is just that. Same as is every list that doesn't count 9/11 as a leftist terrorist attack. Those islamist monsters called the USA the great satan. They criticized capitalism. Everytime they kill someone that's leftist political terror.

That alone changes all the lists massively toward the left being the main source of assassinations politically since ww2 (and before).

Not the domestic left, but still *the ****ing left*. Enemies of western capitalism. The ****ing left. Your friends


by checkraisdraw m

I’m sure many take her seriously, but I don’t think the spike in her viewership is because of that.

CK was a huge Israel guy. The idea he was about to blow the lid open on TPUSA is preposterous and only being promoted by people who swear they have evidence but can’t provide a single shred of it.

Tucker is trying to imply Kirk was perhaps going to open to antisemitism a little more. After all, he platformed the king of the antisemites, Tucker Carlson himself.

Still, i agree it's preposterous to use the fact Kirk admitted an open antisemite like Carlson in the tent, to imply he was pivoting on his crucial support for Israel against the islamic enemies of the west (hamas)


by checkraisdraw m

I’m sure many take her seriously, but I don’t think the spike in her viewership is because of that.

CK was a huge Israel guy. The idea he was about to blow the lid open on TPUSA is preposterous and only being promoted by people who swear they have evidence but can’t provide a single shred of it.

It's really weird how close this dude was to Israel. NYP put an article out about him talking to his rabbi the night before. They put insane murals up of him. Probably nothing to think about. Just a typical right win influencer taking talking points from the genocidal Supremacists state.


by Victor m

It's really weird how close this dude was to Israel. NYP put an article out about him talking to his rabbi the night before. They put insane murals up of him. Probably nothing to think about. Just a typical right win influencer taking talking points from the genocidal Supremacists state.

Here you like a broken clock are right. Kirk was just the normal, rightwing pro Israel person. Not the deranged altrigh pro putin, pro hamas degenerate


by Luckbox Inc m

I listened to that speech and it's beyond awful. He's literally claiming that people drink Coca Cola all over the world and love McDonald's.

Start making your escape plans now.

The snippets I heard from some people had a very SJW vibe--we're trying to save civilization blahblahblah so maybe CJWs lol

----

When are we going to start seeing all these trans people they've been talking about? So far I've seen a couple dudes--granted one was wearing some odd PJs or whatever--but that's not quite male to female sex change territory imo πŸ˜€


by Luciom m

Tucker is trying to imply Kirk was perhaps going to open to antisemitism a little more. After all, he platformed the king of the antisemites, Tucker Carlson himself.

Still, i agree it's preposterous to use the fact Kirk admitted an open antisemite like Carlson in the tent, to imply he was pivoting on his crucial support for Israel against the islamic enemies of the west (hamas)

Tucker keeps saying that CK was going to let people be critical of Israel within TPUSA (previously you could be fired for that and still can) because of the protracted war on Gaza (more evidence the handling of that war has been a disaster for Israel internationally). He also said that he was being yelled at an pressured by his Jewish/Israeli/Zionist backers.

Of course if you look at it, he was still feuding heavily with Nick Fuentes and anyone not named Tucker Carlson or Candace Owens over the Israel issue. I suspect what was going on is he was trying to be diplomatic and keep them in the tent, and that he was actually calculating what he thought was the best way to stop the bleeding.

by Victor m

It's really weird how close this dude was to Israel. NYP put an article out about him talking to his rabbi the night before. They put insane murals up of him. Probably nothing to think about. Just a typical right win influencer taking talking points from the genocidal Supremacists state.

Yes, he was extremely close to Israel in ways I never realized. Hilariously one of his common defenses of Israel is that they promoted LGBT rights lmao


That makes sense bc he was a completely manufactured entity with no sincere views who only spouted out the crap his billionaire paymasters told him to.


by checkraisdraw m

Yes, he was extremely close to Israel in ways I never realized. Hilariously one of his common defenses of Israel is that they promoted LGBT rights lmao

It is not "hilarious". Kirk is on record vilifying fellow republicans when too conservative, telling them they NEEDED HOMOSEXUALS, naming the best rightwing gay people they had in the tent already.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DOmADH6Eq...

He makes the Thiel name repeatedly in particular.

Kirk was pro the *basic* *negative* rights of all homosexuals. Ie Kirk was fully against the state being legitimated in interfering with homosexuals private life and existence at all, AND in favor of "overlooking" homosexuality when it was about accepting someone as an ally (politically, or for business). There is no incoherence.

Islam is super violent and super fascist against homosexuals. Kirk wasn't and had no intention to use the power of the state in that direction.

Kirk was bad for abortion. An actual extremist defending the "no abortion in all cases" person, *willing to legislate his preferences* and mandate them to others. Other than that, he was a normal liberal in terms of what the state should do with minorities and deviants: nothing.


by Luciom m

It is not "hilarious". Kirk is on record vilifying fellow republicans when too conservative, telling them they NEEDED HOMOSEXUALS, naming the best rightwing gay people they had in the tent already.https://www.instagram.com/reel/DOmADH6Eq...He makes the Thiel name repeatedly in particular.Kirk was pro the *basic* *negative* rights of all homosexuals. Ie Kirk was fully against th

It’s hilarious because lefties think he was some stone age bigot wanting to bring back execution for sodomy. Calm your ass down.


by Victor m

That makes sense bc he was a completely manufactured entity with no sincere views who only spouted out the crap his billionaire paymasters told him to.

He started off his career very pro-gay in a libertarian way. He took a lot of crap from groypers from it. Seemed sincere tbh.


by Victor m

That makes sense bc he was a completely manufactured entity with no sincere views who only spouted out the crap his billionaire paymasters told him to.

How dare you--he's one of the greatest political minds of the last century πŸ˜€


by Luciom m

Same as is every list that doesn't count 9/11 as a leftist terrorist attack. Those islamist monsters called the USA the great satan. They criticized capitalism. Everytime they kill someone that's leftist political terror.

Most of this post was standard Luciom, "everything I disagree with is a leftist evil", but this is wild to the point that it feels out of place even in a Luciom post. Being anti-capitalist does not make something leftist. Calling Islamism leftist is on about the same level as calling the Nazism leftist in terms of accuracy.


by Luciom m

Tucker is trying to imply Kirk was perhaps going to open to antisemitism a little more. After all, he platformed the king of the antisemites, Tucker Carlson himself.

Still, i agree it's preposterous to use the fact Kirk admitted an open antisemite like Carlson in the tent, to imply he was pivoting on his crucial support for Israel against the islamic enemies of the west (hamas)

On the PBD podcast Kirk said he thought that October 7 may have been an inside job.

https://m.youtube.com/shorts/GsXt8RodpGc


by Willd m

Most of this post was standard Luciom, "everything I disagree with is a leftist evil", but this is wild to the point that it feels out of place even in a Luciom post. Being anti-capitalist does not make something leftist. Calling Islamism leftist is on about the same level as calling the Nazism leftist in terms of accuracy.

really, being anti capitalis does not make something leftist? that's the basic 101 definition of leftism in economic terms.

It's not that all islamists are necessarily anti capitalist (the UAE aren't for example). But islamic anti-american terrorism is definitely rooted in anti capitalism leftism.


by Luciom m

really, being anti capitalis does not make something leftist? that's the basic 101 definition of leftism in economic terms.

It's not that all islamists are necessarily anti capitalist (the UAE aren't for example). But islamic anti-american terrorism is definitely rooted in anti capitalism leftism.

I feel like ignoring the social scale of left vs right really tarnishes your analysis. If all you mean by β€œleft wing terrorism” is people that don’t want free market capitalism, no one is going to understand what you mean.


by Luciom m

really, being anti capitalis does not make something leftist? that's the basic 101 definition of leftism in economic terms.

It's not that all islamists are necessarily anti capitalist (the UAE aren't for example). But islamic anti-american terrorism is definitely rooted in anti capitalism leftism.

Do you think the Nazi part were pro-capitalist? How about Italy under Mussolini? Most of the anti-capitalist sentiment in the west comes from the left but to claim that all anti-capitalism is leftist is frankly absurd and to be honest, even though I generally disagree with you ideologically on just about everything, I thought this sort of ridiculous argument would be beneath you.

Islamist terror in the west is motivated by social conservatism spawned from religious ideology and the idea that it's anti-capitalist leftism is utter nonsense.

Reply...