Moderation Questions
The last iteration of the moderation discussion thread was a complete disaster. Numerous attempts to keep it on topic fa
I suppose as a thought experiment I’m somewhat curious if you subscribe to the idea of ‘trump couldn’t have sexually assaulted women operating under the assumption that he says things just to say things like how he claims to be a success at business but is actually a failure’ what you think trump is from a sexuality standpoint
1. Does he respect women and insist that everything is consensual and above board and no means no? And if so, show your work given that, as a reminder, he was found liable for sexual assault so the burden of proof is on you
2. Is he an asexual being putting on a show? And it so, show your work given that, as a reminder, he was found liable for sexual assault so the burden of proof is on you
3. Does he prefer men to women and is just lying to kick it? And if so, show your work given that, as a reminder, he was found liable for sexual assault so the burden of proof is on you
Here is a question for you guys: how many pussies do you think Trump has just reached out and grabbed in his lifetime?
Just when you think Lozen is the front runner for stupid posts, Rick comes in to **** the bed and Luckbox starts asking questions.
I don't really care to try to defend Trump on this. It might help some of you to actually listen to the tape again though.
I've listened to it. If you are suggesting that Trump might have been lying for whatever reason, I think that's entirely possible. Trump's instinct to lie is more powerful than his instinct to do almost anything else.
I feel very very sorry for you that you’re going into the moderator thread of the politics subforum of a poker forum defending a liable rapist claiming as a defense mechanism the first chance you’re laughed at that your life is 1000x better than ‘insert poster’
Like, seriously, get help man
If Trump says he kicks ass in the business word you guys wouldn't assume that he is actually out kicking people, right? Would you?
Not sure why "grab them by the pussy" is something you think he's literally doing.
Kicking ass in the business world is a very common idiom. βGrab em by the pussyβ is not. So thatβs one symmetry breaker with respect to why the meanings might be taken more literally.
Also didnβt he literally say on the same tape that he pops tic tacs and just starts kissing women? And he βmoved on her like a bitchβ? These donβt seem to be figurative, he seems to be being very explicit and literal in the acts heβs describing.
Actually the only real defense if we wanted to be the most charitable possible, we could say that he was lying about sexually assaulting women to make himself look more alpha than he actually is, which is just all types of disgusting.
I feel very very sorry for you that youβre going into the moderator thread of the politics subforum of a poker forum defending a liable rapist claiming as a defense mechanism the first chance youβre laughed at that your life is 1000x better than βinsert posterβ
Like, seriously, get help man
I only say that because clearly you're a miserable person.
I suppose as a thought experiment Iβm somewhat curious if you subscribe to the idea of βtrump couldnβt have sexually assaulted women operating under the assumption that he says things just to say things like how he claims to be a success at business but is actually a failureβ what you think trump is from a sexuality standpoint1. Does he respect women and insist that everything
I would imagine that when you're a literal billionaire, you're in a different category than some horny 25 year old heading down to the Vegas strip in the hopes to pay 1000 bucks to get into someone's pants and then drive back to modesto and pretend that nothing ever happened and that you're a still a honorable guy. So I guess none of the above.
These guys probably wouldn't understand sexual harassment and consensual sex at all when they are born into paying and treating women like nice cars at best, or cattle at worst.
I mean, hot take but I don't think Trump and Melania was built out of true love.
Iβll actually give you a serious response to this
Iβm perfectly fine with my life. Iβll always be perfectly fine with it. There has never been, isnβt, and will never be, any part of me so deeply insecure about my existence that I have to juxtapose it against a faceless avatar on the internet that I need to claim their life is worse than mine
60% of the time I think youβre an idiot worthy of mockery. 40% of the time I pity you. Decide for yourself which side this lands you on before you report this post for casting shade on your truly alpha existence
Actually the only real defense if we wanted to be the most charitable possible, we could say that he was lying about sexually assaulting women to make himself look more alpha than he actually is, which is just all types of disgusting.
I think it is entirely possible that he was exaggerating how he typically behaved around women. But as you say, the only possible explanation for exaggerating his behavior in this way is hugely problematic.
I would imagine that when you're a literal billionaire, you're in a different category than some horny 25 year old heading down to the Vegas strip in the hopes to pay 1000 bucks to get into someone's pants and then drive back to modesto and pretend that nothing ever happened and that you're a still a honorable guy. So I guess none of the above.These guys probably wouldn't unde
I don't think the bolded describes all billionaires. But I do think it is a very accurate description of the way that Trump thinks about women.
I don't think the bolded describes all billionaires. But I do think it is a very accurate description of the way that Trump thinks about women.
Probably not ALL billionaires, but it certainly explains the ones who think their wealth demands power demands respect demands the time of day of people who wouldnβt give it to them otherwise
Leon tried to coerce someone into letting him **** her in exchange for a horse ffs
I don't think the bolded describes all billionaires. But I do think it is a very accurate description of the way that Trump thinks about women.
I agree that that unfairly categorizes all rich people. I haven't thought about it for very long obv but I would guess a comparison would be how white people treated blacks in the 50s to how some rich people see women. When you're surrounded by that behavior and have it reinforced around you, it just lowers the bar, I guess.
...but that might be bad example.
I agree that that unfairly categorizes all rich people. I haven't thought about it for very long obv but I would guess a comparison would be how white people treated blacks in the 50s to how some rich people see women. When you're surrounded by that behavior and have it reinforced around you, it just lowers the bar, I guess.
...but that might be bad example.
I feel like not being rapey is a relatively low bar to hurdle, especially when youβre not exactly hurting for consensual options like Trump was at the time. Itβs a power thing more than anything.
