In other news
In the current news climate we see that some figures and events tend to dominate the front-pages heavily. Still, there a
I know I'm dumb but I consider farming and food production as part of national security. I'm all for subsidizing crops for domestic consumption to stay competitive vs cheaper imports, you don't want your food supply reliant on imports.
Subsidies for soybeans meant to be exported I'm less sympathetic.
Right, because you rely on a seller who may not like you, raise prices or go bankrupt themselves, and they you're relying on them to be reliant to who they are relying on.
It would be better to keep the farmers private, subsidize them (which is pretty much the opposite of tariffs) than it is to socialize them. It's pretty much what the Scandinavian countries do - which isn't socialism.
and this is what we get from our supposedly Labour government
International talks to revolutionise how the European Court of Human Rights handles migration cases will begin on Wednesday.
The British government is urging partners to modernise the way states tackle the continent-wide illegal migration crisis.
The talks are the most significant sign yet that international human rights law could be reinterpreted to make it easier for states to target people smuggling and set up 'returns hubs' to hold people with no right to be in Europe.
Just part of an increasing abdication to the far right agenda
It's his thing. He just accuses people of supporting stuff randomly. It's like breathing for him. It's best to just ignore him.
If someone supports the Ukraine war then they support the bussification and mass sacrifice of unwilling slave soldiers. If someone quotes the ADL then the support the Israeli extermination project. If you guys don't want those monikers, then it's simple, just change your positions.
If someone supports the Ukraine war then they support the bussification and mass sacrifice of unwilling slave soldiers. If someone quotes the ADL then the support the Israeli extermination project. If you guys don't want those monikers, then it's simple, just change your positions.
What’s the logical entailment? This is like a level 0 thinker argument.
tf is a "sodomite"?
Good lord I apparently accidentally cited a study published by the ADL who I only have heard of because of this #@$@ing dunce one time and now I'm an ADL lover. One of the most stunningly stupid leaps of logic I've ever seen, yet you cling to it like your life depended on it.
If I remember right it's because I googled incidents of antisemitism because you claimed THERE WEREN'T ANY ANY MORE. I just used the first result because freaking obviously there's antisemitism. You're too stupid to understand that, too. And this was MONTHS ago.
I don't have any allegiance to the ADL you disinguous ignorant prick. There isn't a stance of mine that I believe needs to be changed. You're just too #$#$ing stupid to know what any of stances are.
just check the replies in this thread. they are absolutely relishing the attacks on Muslims from the Trump admin.
Vic, my man, you gotta give your readers some context here; I swear I'm the most terminally online person I know and I still don't what you're going on about half the time. I guess this rando on Twitter has some spicy takes, therefore... something?
Good lord I apparently accidentally cited a study published by the ADL who I only have heard of because of this #@$@ing dunce one time and now I'm a jew hater. One of the most stunningly stupid leaps of logic I've ever seen, yet you cling to it like your life depended on it.I don't have any allegiance to the ADL you disinguous ignorant prick. There isn't a stance of mine that I
The ADL is a Jewish Supremacist organization. No one is calling you a Jew hater lol.
Anyway, I will accept this as you admitting that you had no idea wtf you were talking about about and drop it from now on even though you definitely deserve further shame.
I apparently accidentally cited a study published by the ADL who I only have heard of be
I couldn't give two shts what you were calling me. You're too stupid to even understand a basic conversation.
Anyway, I will accept this as you admitting that you had no idea wtf you were talking about about and drop it from now on even though you definitely deserve further shame.
I couldn't give two shts what you accept it as. You're too stupid to understand anything so what you accept is completely worthless.
Make no mistake, I'm not trying to get you to understand or accept anything. I'm calling you a dumb mother*@#$@er.
Saying I support any kind of violence or harm towards innocent people is as patently *()@#$ing stupid and baseless as if Brian James claimed I was an anti-vaxxer. Your head has to be so far up your colon that you brush your hair with polyps. But you are dead set on exceeding expectations.
right but somehow I am smart enough to avoid "accidentally" quoting genocidal organizations like the ADL. weird how that works.
No, because they aren't gaining control of anything. It's in the govt's best interest to keep the companies stable because their own revenue comes from the taxes on the busineeses and the workers who work for them.I think people have listened too much to Bill O'Rielly or something with the whole "that's socialism! shtick because safety nets are govt programs under a mixed mark
So I’m glad you confirming democrats aren’t socialist or communist like many “xxxxx” on the right ?
Quoting the ADL means you support everything they do. But supporting the Nazis in their plot to kill 5 million poles is self-defense! -Victor logic
right but somehow I am smart enough to avoid "accidentally" quoting genocidal organizations like the ADL. weird how that works.
Yeah, first step is having heard of them you @$#@ing disingenuous prick. Second step is not having to try to demonstrate a basic fact like antisemitism still exists to dfs like you.
Lucky you.

