In other news
In the current news climate we see that some figures and events tend to dominate the front-pages heavily. Still, there a
Why were you willing to take a donation from me the other day when you were very clearly wrongly about what was said? There’s no other way to interpret it. You said you never said something that you very clearly said
i don't think you framed this properly at allthe people were saying don't drive your vehicle with a federal agent standing in front of iteven though i have that perspective, i still think the agent should be charged with murderlikewise, that other guy was clearly murderedjust because someone made terrible decisions to show up armed and interfere with federal agents doesn't excu
I wasn't referring to specific comments you made, as evidenced by the fact that I didn't say anything about cars and ICE. I didn't even remember that was something you said. I was referring to the general phenomenon.
Rickroll, how about Doorbread having a point because you recently welched on a bet and had to have someone come track you down in other parts of the forum because you were avoiding paying out
LOL that does sound plausible.
"I was in <
Why do we have to make that assumption?Imagine that you are pipefitter in 1962 and you are pushing for a change in union leadership. One day at work, a known gangster comes up to you and says, "I knew a guy a few years ago who was pushing for changes at the union. His house burned down. Maybe you heard about that."Would you simply assume that he was relaying a curious anecdo
It's not my claim that we should never read between the lines or that there aren't times when it might be appropriate.
But this is a politics forum not a Japanese business meeting.
here’s where you fall into a dilemma. either you don’t know so you’re ******ed or you do know so you’re a liar. it’s sort of like the cs lewis trilemma of god, madman, or liar, but this one is a dilemma.
Three body problem. Unsolvable
No. We've already discussed this. I guess you can't either.
Why were you willing to take a donation from me the other day when you were very clearly wrongly about what was said There's no other way to interpret it. You said you never said something that you very clearly said
you're an idiot, i specifically didn't opt into your proposed wager because you have the blinders on so much i knew there was no possible way you'd view it as anything than your preposterous portrayal
i stand by my assessment, hence why i was happy to post the thread i believed you were talking about publicly here
lagtight, who hates me even pointed out you were being dishonest in your cherry picked portrayal
again, you used to do pretty well at cognition based activities, so was it drugs, a car crash or something else that caused this kind of meltdown?
Your therapist owes you a refund.
I'm well aware. And almost no place on earth attracts more "just asking questions" trolls than a politics forum.
I'm not going to go out of my way to read every post in a negative light, but at the same time, I'm not going to pretend like I can't recognize that sort of posting when I see it, especially when it comes from people who do it frequently.
Why were you willing to take a donation from me the other day when you were very clearly wrongly about what was said There's no other way to interpret it. You said you never said something that you very clearly said
you're an idiot, i specifically didn't opt into your proposed wager because you have the blinders on so much i knew there was no possible way you'd view it as anythi
You didn’t answer my question. You must be avoiding it
This is a tough one, but I'm going to take a crack at it. Here it goes. I hope that I don't make a fool of myself.
Spoiler
I think it has something to do with Trump feeding his supporters lies about rampant voter fraud.
Right. So anyone trying to bring up one case of an illegal immigrant voting (which is illegal, it’s called voter fraud) is not really seriously engaging in the conversation if that’s the only reason they bring it up. But I’m highly skeptical that’s why he brings it up.
Like this isn't a serious conversation. I'm not the one who brought up anything about voters. Massive lolz if that's chkretrdraw's read
Meanwhile, this is a headline in today's world.
The State of Minnesota won a temporary restraining order that prevents the Department of Homeland Security and other government agencies from altering or destroying evidence related to the fatal shooting of Alex Pretti by Border Patrol on Jan. 24.
here’s where you fall into a dilemma. either you don’t know so you’re ******ed or you do know so you’re a liar. it’s sort of like the cs lewis trilemma of god, madman, or liar, but this one is a dilemma.
The original trilemma is pretty stupid to begin with since it leaves out dispel writers writing 50+ years after the fact made up divinity claims and put them on Jesus’ lips.
The original trilemma is pretty stupid to begin with since it leaves out dispel writers writing 50+ years after the fact made up divinity claims and put them on Jesus’ lips.
of course. cs lewis operates under the assumption that the bible accurately reports the words of jesus, which seems dubious.
Maybe you guys can keep track of the things you say yourselves so I don't have to find a post from 18 months and 2500 posts ago to prove what you yourselves saidRickroll and Geezer, two of the guys with the most noted distorted senses of reality, want to constantly attack me for holding them to their own wordsRickroll, how about Doorbread having a point because you recently wel
Why do you lie so much? I'm more than happy to be held to my own words. That would be easier to do if you weren't lying at the drop of a hat about what I'm actually saying.
wanna play chess????
you're an idiot, i specifically didn't opt into your proposed wager because you have the blinders on so much i knew there was no possible way you'd view it as anything than your preposterous portrayali stand by my assessment, hence why i was happy to post the thread i believed you were talking about publicly here
Huh?? I don't hate you at all. Why do you think that? I probably agree with you more often than I disagree with you.
