Baseline strategy 100 nl gto/narrowing ranges, how to adapt lowstakes bluffing nonnarrow ranges
Been playing 100 nl for a while, and have recently played 25 nl.
I realize i've gotten used to reading ranges at 100 nl. Its not as easy to narrow down ranges at lower stakes as theres more calling stations and over valued bluffs, so hand reading as my go to strategy when playing gto loses at times
I think the concept is value to bluff ratio where people are over bluffing, but i dont want to adapt because its not a narrowed down range
What are some thoughts and concepts on baseline strategy on someone who relies alot on narrowing down ranges, to adapt to games like 25 nl or live poker, where overbluffing and calling stations means you cant narrow down ranges as much.
3 Replies
You can make a lot of inferences on someone's strategy or their inherent imbalances by simply seeing one hand that is (enough) out of line.
yeah, i've gotten over reliant on ranges. However when I try to implement reads, alot of times there reads that are off. Moreover its assessments about players that are not really how they play. I don't know how to improve my reads but I'm not good at it and sometimes lose more when I don't play a prethought out strategy. It something that needs work, but not sure how to improve. Its almost like I'm to rash with intuition.
yeah, i've gotten over reliant on ranges. However when I try to implement reads, alot of times there reads that are off. Moreover its assessments about players that are not really how they play. I don't know how to improve my reads but I'm not good at it and sometimes lose more when I don't play a prethought out strategy. It something that needs work, but not sure how to improv
Well, consider posting a couple hands with your thought process and see if they align with others' thoughts. Alternatively, seek out a few like minded individuals and do some hand history review, session review, or live sweat sessions.
