[extracted] New(?) 9-11 stuff
KSM got a plea deal. The guy who supposedly masterminded the 9/11 attacks is not getting the death penalty.
If you still
So, a pool has the form of a sphere, and pool balls exist. But spheres don't exist. Have I got this right? So, your issue is saying that something is as sphere as opposed to saying that something has the form of a sphere, correct?
So, a pool has the form of a sphere, and pool balls exist. But spheres don't exist. Have I got this right? So, your issue is saying that something is as sphere as opposed to saying that something has the form of a sphere, correct?
Correct. The forms are immaterial blueprints.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
Hint: it's not undersea cables.
Correct. The forms are immaterial blueprints.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
What is the form of the sun?
I don't recall the Pythagoras theorem proof you said I used btw. What was this?
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
I don't recall the Pythagoras theorem proof you said I used btw. What was this?
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
Probably something about the horizon. What is the form of the earth?
Begging the question, assumes the Sun is an object.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
What is the Sun?
Real bad sure... The vast majority of internet traffic is via under sea cables. What else you conspiritarding about?
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
Saying that the vast majority are x doesn’t mean that y can’t follow a different pattern. And this pattern is really bad for you because you have to explain how people are using assumptions about a globe earth to put satellites into our orbit and magically those calculations work out.
The Sun is an "exactly"? What's that?
The Earth is a "bingo"? What's that?
Saying that the vast majority are x doesn’t mean that y can’t follow a different pattern. And this pattern is really bad for you because you have to explain how people are using assumptions about a globe earth to put satellites into our orbit and magically those calculations work out.
What's an assumption?
Sent from my tin-can using a string.
Saying that the vast majority are x doesn’t mean that y can’t follow a different pattern. And this pattern is really bad for you because you have to explain how people are using assumptions about a globe earth to put satellites into our orbit and magically those calculations work out.
No that would be for you to explain how these assumptions support a globe model.
Coordinate systems are not problematic for anybody ofc.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
You're the expert, I thought you were going to tell us! So, basically, you're telling us now that you don't know what the Sun and the Earth are, and whether they even have a form. I mean, that's not particularly interesting, is it? Is there anything you do know about these mysteries that you are able to share?
You're the expert, I thought you were going to tell us! So, basically, you're telling us now that you don't know what the Sun and the Earth are, and whether they even have a form. I mean, that's not particularly interesting, is it? Is there anything you do know about these mysteries that you are able to share?
You thought wrong.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
You don’t know what an assumption is?
No that would be for you to explain how these assumptions support a globe model.
Coordinate systems are not problematic for anybody ofc.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
They support a globe earth because the math and the mechanics of satellites assumes orbits, which assumes planetary rotation, which assumes a globe rotating in space. That these assumptions are not falsified a posteriori means that they are consistent. And since they are the type of thing that could be falsified in theory because they aren’t axiomatic assumptions, then that gives support to the globe theory.
