KK at sharp game
1/3/6 NLHE 9 handed
Crusher LAG who's not a pro but is one of the best semi-pro (pro-wannabes) I regularly play with invi
I have tried really hard to have a respectful discussion, but you don't make it easy.
Here's a tip to make it easier. Just think about what you said and internalize how wrong you are. Meditate on the fact you have no idea what you're talking about. Then come back to the discussion with an open mind ready to learn.
You're in opposite land right now. Everything you say is the OPPOSITE of what's correct.
When he raises flop to $225 off of a $1200 stack it is no where close to committing his entire stack.
He started with $1,200. Commitment threshold is $400. He's put in $300 so far. There are two streets of betting to come on a dynamic board. This is not getting checked down. More money is definitely going in, and we are definitely crossing the commitment threshold. Our hand is not drawing. We have but 2 clean outs to improve. So we should decide right now if we want to get committed.
We shouldn't want to commit. You do because you're from Opposite Land
It's a pretty simple spot vs low stakes opponents.
Agreed. So why can't you figure it out?
1. You call flop (against his initial C/R range you're ahead).
No. That's only true in Opposite Land. Here in the real world we are actually an underdog against his range. What range are you giving him where we are ahead. Go ahead and list the potential spade draws he could have. I count about 32 combos total. 25 of them have a pair, a straight draw, or an ace as well as the flush draw. I already told you what range I'm giving him. It's this: 99-88,33,98s,AsQs,AsJs,QsJs,AsTs,QsTs,JsTs,As8s,Qs8s,Js8s,Ts8s,As7s,Js7s,Ts7s,8s7s,As6s,Ts6s,8s6s,7s6s,As5s,8s5s,7s5s,6s5s,As4s,8s4s,As2s.
Against that range, we have 42%. We're not ahead. It's the opposite.
2. If he jams turns or commits most of his stack. You fold (against his turn jamming range with most low stakes opponents you're crushed). 3. If he checks turn or bets some small portion of his stack. You don't fold (against this range you're ahead).
You can't say this without defining those ranges man!!! Otherwise you're just spouting crap out of your whale-hole! Name some freakin' hands!!
Any bet on the turn puts us past the threshold for commitment. It doesn't matter if he bets 100 or 900 at this point. He's already made up his mind to go broke. That part of his analysis is over.
Any bet at all means all the money is going in by the end. Period. Full stop. So all he cares about now is what you do. His bet sizing will tell you what he wants you to do. If he bets big, he wants to you to fold. if he bets small, he wants a call.
Reality is the total opposite of what you just said.
The only real exception is if the board pairs on the turn.....proceed with caution.
And now the icing on the cake!! You just announced you have no clue what kind of range villain has nor have you used it for any basis of your analysis. Otherwise, you wouldn't say this. The fact you did just say this proves that everything you say is just for argument's sake and has no real poker analysis behind it.
Other than a King, a board pairing 9 is the absolute best card in the deck for us. I'll let you ponder the 'why'. You need to learn
Yo prez, I'm curious, is this your first account here or have you ever been banned before (for being a dick obviously)?
I have no recollection of any such events, and I deny any allegations against me.
It's 2NL advice -- just take it with a grain of salt 😉 I mean, he folds the flop. LOL.
Little man is raging his 2nl advice is being ignored.
Lol.
Go ahead and ignore it. Listen to the people in this thread.
That's what's keeping poker profitable
Thank you
You don't have the slightest idea of what is or isn't keeping poker profitable. If you did, you wouldn't be playing 2nl(or 10nl) after 20+ years.
Anyways, you were suggesting fold flop. Anything you say after that should be ignored.
You make it sound like I'm some broke loser who can't afford any other stakes.
I've chosen to challenge myself to build a no-deposit bankroll online. I've been incredibly successful thus far.
For the record I still play live all the time. 1/2, and 2/5 just like everyone else on this forum.
If you think I'm wrong, say why. Mocking my success isn't an argument.
Not mocking your success. I'm denying it. Not a soul alive would play 80k hands of 2nl voluntarily if they have been ''incredibly successful'' thus far. Not a soul.
Btw, you desperately trying to convince us otherwise, is a huge tell.
If you think I'm wrong, say why.
You play 2nl and can't beat 10nl. That's why you're wrong, always.
Not mocking your success. I'm denying it. Not a soul alive would play 80k hands of 2nl voluntarily if they have been ''incredibly successful'' thus far. Not a soul.
Btw, you desperately trying to convince us otherwise, is a huge tell.
You play 2nl and can't beat 10nl. That's why you're wrong, always.
What you're denying are truth and reality. And I am absolutely beating 10NL, you must not be keeping up with the blog man.
