POG Politics Thread Version 3

that's your reaction?

those are apartment buildings being blown up.

the cell phone video footage?

looks like 5 or 6 city blocks, counting building rows

Its not a world war until Germany invades France

If it's only that when "great"/"A" powers fight each other directly (rather than by proxy), then half the world could be on fire without qualifying

if you're China, do you call Brussels rn and ask how they're feeling these days?

i'm not ruling anything out but you don't know what they are hitting, what has been hit is already covered in smoke by the time the video starts

the one thing we see clearly get hit is this

which has a lot of antennas and towers on it - something which is sometimes on civilian apartment buildings but usually when found in that sort of concentration is likely military or communications centers - which would be considered normal targets

again, it could be a lot of things, but it's silly to just speculate that they are hitting apartment buildings because there are apartment buildings in the foreground

is it a reckless attack? absolutely
did civilians likely die? i don't see how they couldn't have

is that an attack i would signed off on as president - absolutely not

but that doesn't mean they are carpet bombing residential buildings

over 100 school kids the other day
starving hundreds of thousands of iraqis with sanctions
wmd lies for decades of war
decades of genocide in palestine
vietnam
korea
nuking cities
napalm on German cities
centuries of genocide

rickroll sees video of bombed apartment buildings in Tehran and says "maybe it's a legitimate miltary target. dont' jump to conclusions"

or maybe he's just arguing about the semantics of "carpet bombing"

I agree, I wouldn't call it carpet bombing either. but that's not really the crucial piece of info here

I think the more crucial question is which media outlet owned by a billionaire does rickroll get his "reliable" news from

Perfectly normal, sir. No one suspects a thing.

Is he rotting from the inside. How are they keeping this thing walking about hating. Or was David Icke right all along.

Give me a heads up when an arm falls off.

Will also give you an arm up if his head falls off.

what are your thoughts on The Epoch Times?

this is post jump started a back and forth with one of their cult members

there's a lot more - this is just a bunch of random snippets

frankly, i'm surprised my viewpoint wasn't already pretty obvious

Your viewpoints seems fairly incoherent from the posts I have read

you know, I've been reflecting on that dressing down he gave me, and I think (hope?) I've come out of it with a more open mind

based on his name, I read his avatar as the Nelson (if that's who's driving), but maybe he's really the multi-generational simpson and he's just had enough of it

awkward xpost there, Markus

It's magic Wearwolf!

Pre-Zombie Trump

Knowing Texas and Texans as I do, I hereby predict Jasmine Crockett beats Talarico in the democrat primary today. Talarico seems like he might be genderfluid or something, some rando state rep they dug up, and Jasmine is all woman. And a half.

If Beto hadn't overreached and burned all his chances earlier, he'd be killing this right now.

do you think either has a good chance at flipping the seat?

when someone is talking about liberal cities excluding poors and minorities and compares black home ownership rates in those coastal cities vs rust belt republican dominated cities you need to recognize that is the central point of the discussion

either refute the city data - for all i know my surface level googling was incorrect or misguided - wouldn't be the first time

or ignore it and move on

when you respond with "yeah look at the rural dakotas" a place that even if we were not specifically talking about cities - would be a difficult entry point given the extremely low population and extremely low percentage of minorities would be a silly and highly cherry picked response - but, importantly, we're not talking about rural areas nor states, we're specifically focused on cities - so it's doubly bad for that reason

and frankly, either you are not equipped to carry out a functional and fact based discussion (could be out of laziness or bad habits, could be because you don't have that 2nd gear of thought - idk) or you're not posting in good faith and actively trolling

you do this all the time - it's classic bad faithed whataboutism of "i came into this with my mind made up and going to try to brute force this through" you even make nazi references as well - it's just terrible ****posting and you do this all the time, this was much more a response to your body of work than to any singular post - but coming back at me with "but look at south dakota" is just incredibly stupid that whether it's intended as intentional obfuscation for sake of political rhetoric where you found the city data didn't help your cause so you looked for something that did or that you fundamentally don't understand the difference and simply googled something that would give the answer you were looking for rather than what you should be looking at - either reason are good reasons to stop posting about politics or anything else serious for that matter - you'll find much more joy in reddit

Thank God Saint Charlie isn't alive to see this

I strongly suspect Erika is fine with it.

trump breaking all kinds of records

Obama's droned a few kids too. War sucks but hopefully better than Iran with a nuke and an ideology that calls for Israel to be wiped into the sea.