[extracted] New(?) 9-11 stuff
KSM got a plea deal. The guy who supposedly masterminded the 9/11 attacks is not getting the death penalty.
If you still
I did like the part where she mentions some cars got toasted while others where nearly untouched but instead of understanding that that is literally normal fire behavior, its precision invisible laser beams.
She's also had it pointed out to her many times that those cars were towed there from different locations later, but she refuses to accept that for no reason.
Well yes. They are not needed for you because bin laden did it.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
I never heard that bin Laden was flying the actual planes, just that he had financed the operation. But yes, I do think the planes hitting the buildings and resulting fire and structural damage caused the buildings to collapse. I know, that sounds like fantasy science fiction to you! Flatty!
Guessing they didn't think to ask any Earth shape (oops, form) questions on the test then. Or they did and you did the smart thing and put what you knew the conspirators wanted to hear?
Common misconception. Even my astronomy module did not require any such nonsensical buffoonary. The celestial coordinate system used to identify astronomical bodies is a... celestial coordinate system.
A study of "Martian data" analysis did not require real data for which to build models from.
Gravitational models are... gravitational models. Etc.
On the physics side, experiments require a flat plane from which to reference from. No problem there.
The spinning ball religion has no place in physics.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
Nothing I have said in this thread is incorrect and it has always been sorted by evidence. Everything you have said in this thread has been wrong and nothing has been supported by evidence.
You make junior high level mistakes at physics and refuse to acknowledge them. You believe the earth is not a sphere and everything in space is fake.
You are the idiot, buddy. Not me.
Physics? What's that.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
Common misconception. Even my astronomy module did not require any such nonsensical buffoonary. The celestial coordinate system used to identify astronomical bodies is a... celestial coordinate system.A study of "Martian data" analysis did not require real data for which to build models from.Gravitational models are... gravitational models. Etc.On the physics side, experiments
Did you share any of your more... umm... untraditional views on things like terrestrial form and terrestrial gravitation with any of your teachers or classmates? If so, how did such interactions typically conclude?
I never heard that bin Laden was flying the actual planes, just that he had financed the operation. But yes, I do think the planes hitting the buildings and resulting fire and structural damage caused the buildings to collapse. I know, that sounds like fantasy science fiction to you! Flatty!
Are you saying that with a straight face. Or are the exclamation marks a dead giveaway.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
Did you share any of your more... umm... untraditional views on things like terrestrial form and terrestrial gravitation with any of your teachers or classmates? If so, how did such interactions typically conclude?
Terrestrial and universal gravitation demarcated is standard in the books. You do not understand experiment, model or theory and how and when, and why, these are useful.
There is no physical basis for equating inertial and gravitational mass. It is of no consequence. There is no possible measurement of a non-uniform gravitational field governed by Newton's law of gravitation. It is an interesting aside, nothing more.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
Tell us about the space lasers, Flatty!
Terrestrial and universal gravitation demarcated is standard in the books. You do not understand experiment, model or theory and how and when, and why, these are useful.There is no physical basis for equating inertial and gravitational mass. It is of no consequence. There is no possible measurement of a non-uniform gravitational field governed by Newton's law of gravitation. It
My dude, there is no such thing as "terrestrial gravitation" as distinct from universal gravitation. They are the same thing, give or take a slight centrifugal force element which you don't believe in anyway. Terrestrial gravitation is simply a specific case of universal gravitation here on Earth. You need them to be fundamentally different so you can posit parallel field lines. It isn't and they aren't.
Terrestrial and universal gravitation demarcated is standard in the books. You do not understand experiment, model or theory and how and when, and why, these are useful.There is no physical basis for equating inertial and gravitational mass. It is of no consequence. There is no possible measurement of a non-uniform gravitational field governed by Newton's law of gravitation. It
This fascinating and entirely incorrect analysis aside, you didn't answer my question. Did you discuss the form of the earth or horizon dip observations with your teachers or classmates?
My dude, there is no such thing as "terrestrial gravitation" as distinct from universal gravitation. They are the same thing, give or take a slight centrifugal force element which you don't believe in anyway. You need them to be different so you can posit parallel field lines. It isn't and they aren't.
Wait. Does billy believe that "terrestrial" bodies exhibit some sort of special gravitation that is unrelated to their mass and distance?
I mean, as with everything related to Billy's theories, it's about clear as mud, but here, have at it:
Light gates or similar. Vector is perpendicular to the ground, which is level. All acceleration vectors are parallel for any and all construction projects, i.e. anything useful. No deviation for any bridge, building, canal (generally quite long) etc. No deviation from parallel field lines. It is a uniform field.Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
Discussion starts somewhere around that post I think, but it's also popped up here and there again like now.
Billy is shrewd enough to realise that if the Earth were a (finite) disc, universal gravitation would dictate a net force towards the centre of the disc, or at the very least shrewd enough to cotton on after I pointed it out. And we can't have that, so we need a different model with parallel field lines.
You need to look up a lot about physics. You think the floors of the WTC will come to a complete stop when hitting the floor below. Literally laughable. I don't need to look up anything about physics.
The first thing about it is that the floors downward momentum is conserved upon contact with the floor below it. I know this. You don't.
You're an idiot.
I notice Deuces disappeared at the same time billy showed back up. Last time billy was here for any length, Deuces disappeared at the same time too.
My dude, there is no such thing as "terrestrial gravitation" as distinct from universal gravitation. They are the same thing, give or take a slight centrifugal force element which you don't believe in anyway. Terrestrial gravitation is simply a specific case of universal gravitation here on Earth. You need them to be fundamentally different so you can posit parallel field lines
"Centrifugal force element"
"You don't believe in".
Oh boy.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
You need to look up a lot about physics. You think the floors of the WTC will come to a complete stop when hitting the floor below. Literally laughable. I don't need to look up anything about physics.
The first thing about it is that the floors downward momentum is conserved upon contact with the floor below it. I know this. You don't.
You're an idiot.
I see. Please tell us how momentum is calculated.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
