[extracted] New(?) 9-11 stuff
KSM got a plea deal. The guy who supposedly masterminded the 9/11 attacks is not getting the death penalty.
If you still
No no. That's not what an appeal to authority fallacy is. In fact, these are not random people. These are the people that destroyed your theories parroted from Judy wood 20 years ago that you just handwaved away.
And they are verified credentials. You can look them up yourself other than the anonymous one.
You'll do anything to avoid addressing this topic.
Billy's guy (David Hughes) does have a legit PhD in German Studies from Duke University. Not sure how that qualifies him to adjudicate scientific matters, but he does have some bona fides.
Has the gorgo malfunctioned?Anyway, more homework for y'all (geezerchess I will be checking).This excellent piece explores quite a bit:https://dhughes.substack.com/p/in-defenc...Note the lack of primary evidence of molten steel. But plenty of hearsay encouraged by the intelligence services to muddy the waters. One could be forgiven for falling for it.Sent from my
What you call an excellent piece others would call a mass of unsupported theories that contradict themselves. It is good to know the intelligence services had to be employed to make this even more confusing for you guys.
No no. That's not what an appeal to authority fallacy is. In fact, these are not random people. These are the people that destroyed your theories parroted from Judy wood 20 years ago that you just handwaved away.
And they are verified credentials. You can look them up yourself other than the anonymous one.
You'll do anything to avoid addressing this topic.
I'll not be looking them up.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
Billy, you mentioned before that you are an engineer and a member of the scientific community. What are your qualifications?
What you call an excellent piece others would call a mass of unsupported theories that contradict themselves. It is good to know the intelligence services had to be employed to make this even more confusing for you guys.
Well yes. They are not needed for you because bin laden did it.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
Has the gorgo malfunctioned?Anyway, more homework for y'all (geezerchess I will be checking).This excellent piece explores quite a bit:https://dhughes.substack.com/p/in-defenc...Note the lack of primary evidence of molten steel. But plenty of hearsay encouraged by the intelligence services to muddy the waters. One could be forgiven for falling for it.Sent from my
I did like the part where she mentions some cars got toasted while others where nearly untouched but instead of understanding that that is literally normal fire behavior, its precision invisible laser beams.
Deuces, does the military still have these 25 year old accurate laser beams to fend off the Iranian jet skis?
Also, it not total normal for an area of that size to stay hot for months so that means its a continued energy release from invisible said weapons.
I did like the part where she mentions some cars got toasted while others where nearly untouched but instead of understanding that that is literally normal fire behavior, its precision invisible laser beams.Deuces, does the military still have these 25 year old accurate laser beams to fend off the Iranian jet skis?Also, it not total normal for an area of that size to stay hot f
"Literally normal fire behaviour" is not to leave masses of paper unburnt while metal is liquified. Nor is it to burn out car engines while leaving plastic lights on the same cars untouched.
It is not normal fire behaviour to have the damage localised and specified in this way. The microwave analogy is again useful in understanding constructive and destructive wave interference.
But glad you read some of it, well done for that.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
Bachelor of engineering, from a redbrick UK uni. Bachelor of science and master of physics with the OU.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
Guessing they didn't think to ask any Earth shape (oops, form) questions on the test then. Or they did and you did the smart thing and put what you knew the conspirators wanted to hear?
"Literally normal fire behaviour" is not to leave masses of paper unburnt while metal is liquified. Nor is it to burn out car engines while leaving plastic lights on the same cars untouched.It is not normal fire behaviour to have the damage localised and specified in this way. The microwave analogy is again useful in understanding constructive and destructive wave interference.
We saw that in the cali wildfires and in Maui - but I believe they used the lasers in Maui as well.
The 1.2 million rounds of ammunition stored on the third floor of WTC6 was found “melted together into large ‘bullet balls’” (Professional Safety, 2002, p. 26), yet somehow it had “melted” without going off.
Maybe Judy is a Die Hard fan but bullets don't go flying across the room when they burn up in a fire. This I know.
I'm not even sure what she's going with here, is there some other powerful force that's causing bullets to do what they are suppose to do?
Yo Dunces, you got that FEMA report yet or what?
Haven't read the whole thread but I was wondering from the flat earth experts here, what purpose would it serve to make people believe the earth was round?
Haven't read the whole thread but I was wondering from the flat earth experts here, what purpose would it serve to make people believe the earth was round?
Oh boy, are you in for a treat.
Short answer: nobody knows. But if you do think it's round, it's because you've been brainwashed by TV.
fml!
I'll not be looking them up.
Oh and I did not handwave them because I did not read them. I read one comment where one of these highly qualified individuals was making jokes about mentally ill people.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
That's called handwaving them away. Their refutations do not go away just because you don't read them.
I said useful idiot, in the context of a joke.
You are also an idiot.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
Nothing I have said in this thread is incorrect and it has always been sorted by evidence. Everything you have said in this thread has been wrong and nothing has been supported by evidence.
You make junior high level mistakes at physics and refuse to acknowledge them. You believe the earth is not a sphere and everything in space is fake.
You are the idiot, buddy. Not me.
