[extracted] New(?) 9-11 stuff
KSM got a plea deal. The guy who supposedly masterminded the 9/11 attacks is not getting the death penalty.
If you still
Stop saying "ad hom" - you have no idea what it means. Discrediting her theory by attacking her personally would be an "ad hom". Mocking her theory because it's prima facie ****ing ridiculous isn't. And no, it's not an amazing coincidence that I heard something about space lasers in a 9/11 conspiracy thread and came to some obvious conclusions about why the lasers would have to
Why is it ridiculous? It is based on primary evidence. It is the only complete independent investigation into 9/11 that has ever been carried out.
To speak of deduction here. That is precisely her method. You are clueless here. You are totally dishonest also because you have not read the book. So you do not know what is in it.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
Why is it ridiculous? It is based on primary evidence. It is the only complete independent investigation into 9/11 that has ever been carried out.
To speak of deduction here. That is precisely her method. You are clueless here. You are totally dishonest also because you have not read the book. So you do not know what is in it.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
Why don't you tell me what's in it and what the supporting evidence is then, like I asked 20 million ****ing posts ago.
And somehow I understand basic physics better than you. You think Judy Wood's theory about how a falling floor would come to a complete stop each time it contacted the floor below is not hilariously wrong. That tells me I understand basic physics better than you do.
And yes, pretty much everyone here knows those are the two areas I am educated in primarily.
Superfluous "basic" noted.
Misuse of "theory" noted.
Misuse of "falling" noted.
Misuse of "contacted" noted.
Define physics.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
You should probably start by noting your own misuse of "ad hom", chief.
First acknowledge you have judged prior to knowing any of the facts. And apologise for that.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
Listen, we already have one insufferably annoying twat around here, you don't need to keep auditioning for that role. You going to make your case for these ****ing lasers or you going to keep ****ing around?
Billy just FYI i honestly think its a good entry point to buy into the flat earth market on Polymarket now that its back down to zero percent.
Superfluous "basic" noted.
Misuse of "theory" noted.
Misuse of "falling" noted.
Misuse of "contacted" noted.
Define physics.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
Dude, I'm not jumping through hoops with you about a subject you demonstrably don't understand. You agree with Judy Wood that the floors come to a complete stop when striking the floor below. There is no point in discussing anything at all to do with physics with you. None.
Until you can acknowledge that absolutely hilariously wrong assumption, we cannot and will not proceed. And once you do acknowledge that, Judy Wood's claims go right out the window because they are all based on that (and juvenile stuff like dismissing that burned cars were towed away from ground zero and were thus not facing the same way in the pictures as they were on 9/11).
This is just laughably stupid and you aren't going to convince anyone of anything with this stupid "define physics" dance you like to do.
Dude, I'm not jumping through hoops with you about a subject you demonstrably don't understand. You agree with Judy Wood that the floors come to a complete stop when striking the floor below. There is no point in discussing anything at all to do with physics with you. None.Until you can acknowledge that absolutely hilariously wrong assumption, we cannot and will not proceed. An
There is no point discussing that point. You have no idea what that point is. That point requires
A) you to read the book. Or
B) you to understand my summary of it.
Neither is going to happen.
We move to
C) exposing your ignorance. To help you. And failing that, for amusement.
Twice now you have claimed "physics". Let me help you. As Socrates teaches us, the definition of a word describes its defining feature. What is it that *defines* physics, makes it unique, differentiates it from other fields of study, what is its nature?
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
Directed energy weapons. Which are lasers. We already had this chat, remember? If not, try and figure out what type of energy is being directed, and look up what a laser is.
So not space lasers? It's just you said space lasers. The d2 trademarked ad hom trope.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
Anyone got that FEMA report?
Phase change to "liquid" is probably the wrong model to apply to this. It assumes a conventional temperature increase beyond the melting point. If this were the case, phenomena such as un-burnt paper alongside toasted steel is highly unlikely. Yet we witnessed masses of paper alongside torched cars. Other evidence of unconventional heating included engines of cars burnt out whi
Bumping this because I actually want to know deuces opinion on the primary evidence.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
Correct. You don't understand basic physics. Not reading anything else from you on this subject until you acknowledge that the floors don't come to a complete stop as Judy Wood claims.
Nothing.
Shame. It would have been fun to see you frantically search the international skeptics for a defintion of physics. You know, from the experts.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
Shame. It would have been fun to see you frantically search the international skeptics for a defintion of physics. You know, from the experts.
The shame is you still pretending like you know anything at all about physics when you think the floors would come to a complete stop everytime they hit a lower floor. Still one of the absolute dumbest things I've ever read, and I just watched your stupid as try to claim the earth isn't a globe for like 3 weeks in a row or something.