[extracted] New(?) 9-11 stuff
KSM got a plea deal. The guy who supposedly masterminded the 9/11 attacks is not getting the death penalty.
If you still
Well, it's fine. It's there as I demonstrated in the screenshot, and I gave a separate source, too.
Me 2, billy 0 (as usual)
Sounds like Billy is never going to let go of his cretinous assumption that all floors start accelerating from rest at g, but I guess it's a bit much to ask for someone who thinks the ****ing Earth is flat to revise his priors.
wHaT iS mOmEnTuM? wHaT iS pHySicS? wHaT iS sCiEnCe?
Yo Deuces, when you're done reading whatever drivel Billy is begging you to read, get us that FEMA report, yeah?
None of this makes any sense in the slightest. Why are we assuming freefall and why would assuming freefall mean floors must have begun to fall before being impelled to do so? Can you be a bit clearer about what you're talking about?Do you think that each floor starts off accelerating at g? Seems like it's been explained about 1000 times to you why this is not the case and you'
For goodness sake please learn some agreed facts on the matter before entering into this.
1. Do you or do you not agree with the NIST collapse time of an average 10 seconds?
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
For goodness sake please learn some agreed facts on the matter before entering into this.
1. Do you or do you not agree with the NIST collapse time of an average 10 seconds?
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
I have no idea what NIST said, I haven't looked into it. I am asking you to justify your calculation so I can understand where you arrived at all these numbers you keep throwing around. I want the assumptions you made and the formulas you used.
Or if you continue to refuse to provide them, we can just agree to ignore all your collapse time numbers as unsubstantiated fantasy.
How about you remove the plank from your own eye first?
Like all the terms you can't define.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
I'm not going to get into some dumb philosophical debate over the definition of "science" for the purposes of doing a few basic calculations. Trying to derail the conversation in that direction is transparent sophistry and evasion on your part.
I have no idea what NIST said, I haven't looked into it. I am asking you to justify your calculation so I can understand where you arrived at all these numbers you keep throwing around. I want the assumptions you made and the formulas you used.
Or if you continue to refuse to provide them, we can just agree to ignore all your collapse time numbers as unsubstantiated fantasy.
Fine i am re-doing the calcs.
We first need to have agreement on the official story collapse time. This is massively important. I will not post my proof until we have this agreement. In fact this was the very first thing I tried to get gorgo to agree to. Let's try again. Adults only please.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
Proof? No. It's one of the two sources I provided for my information.
Where's your source, lying idiot?
You are lying to yourself, if not openly lying to everybody else. Wilful, blind ignorance. Refusal to believe the evidence of your own eyes you prefer the unverified opinion of some random person claiming that circa 180k tonnes is somehow 1.8m tonnes.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
You are lying to yourself, if not openly lying to everybody else. Wilful, blind ignorance. Refusal to believe the evidence of your own eyes you prefer the unverified opinion of some random person claiming that circa 180k tonnes is somehow 1.8m tonnes.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
So no source then?
Literally "proof by just look at it" like I predicted. The funniest part is you presented nothing to look at.
hahahahaha
***** idiot
(in before he posts a picture weeks into cleanup and ignores that a huge portion of debris wound up in the basement area)
Fine i am re-doing the calcs.
We first need to have agreement on the official story collapse time. This is massively important. I will not post my proof until we have this agreement. In fact this was the very first thing I tried to get gorgo to agree to. Let's try again. Adults only please.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
If the official time is of importance, make it an input variable to whatever you are calculating. This way all assumptions are crystal clear.
You are lying to yourself, if not openly lying to everybody else. Wilful, blind ignorance. Refusal to believe the evidence of your own eyes you prefer the unverified opinion of some random person claiming that circa 180k tonnes is somehow 1.8m tonnes.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
Source for 180k tonnes? Judy Wood?
Billy, I'm just going to completely ignore any claims you make regarding collapse times or amount of debris removed from the site since you've shown no work or provided any evidence for these and as it stands they are empty assertions you might as well have pulled from thin air.
'Thin air' might also explain the rapid collapse and accelerated dustification process.
Fine i am re-doing the calcs.
We first need to have agreement on the official story collapse time. This is massively important. I will not post my proof until we have this agreement. In fact this was the very first thing I tried to get gorgo to agree to. Let's try again. Adults only please.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
I don't think it's very polite to exclude Deuces from this conversation.
Proof? No. It's one of the two sources I provided for my information.
Where's your source, lying idiot?
This sort of discussion with billy is useless. There is no form of proof that he would accept. I doubt that they weighed every piece of debris that they hauled to a landfill, and even if they did, and even if you had access to the landfill records, he would claim that they were fake or inaccurate. He obviously will claim that estimates in news reports are inaccurate or manipulated. At the same time, he will accept statements from fellow travelers as incontestable facts.
This sort of discussion with billy is useless. There is no form of proof that he would accept. I doubt that they weighed every piece of debris that they hauled to a landfill, and even if they did, and even if you had access to the landfill records, he would claim that they were fake or inaccurate. He obviously will claim that estimates in news reports are inaccurate or manip
Obviously, but there is no reason to doubt they weighed the debris. Trucks have a capacity and are weighed regularly.
And don't mistake this for a discussion. billy is strutting around here taking a dump all over the place, not discussing anything. I'm simply making sure people reading have the facts and know where they come from.
And making fun of him, as he deserves, of course.
