[extracted] New(?) 9-11 stuff

[extracted] New(?) 9-11 stuff

KSM got a plea deal. The guy who supposedly masterminded the 9/11 attacks is not getting the death penalty.

If you still

01 August 2024 at 05:08 PM
Reply...

6212 Replies


Earlier posts are available on our legacy forum HERE

by d2_e4

Ok, I will review your adjusted model when you post it. This time, be explicitly clear about what it's calculating and what assumptions you are making if you want me to look at it.

Repeating this fantasy over and over doesn't make it true.

Do try to keep up, i know this is stressful for you.

The prior model i posted circa 15 million posts ago. This includes some resistance estimates.

But we, you and I together, teamBilly, calculated without resistance. It is over. Progressive collapse is over.

Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk


by d2_e4

Billy,

A bowling ball rolls off the roof of a building just as it starts to collapse.

a). What hits the ground first, the bowling ball or the roof of the building?
b). Do you consider to the building to have collapsed when the bowling ball hits the ground?

Now replace "bowling ball" with "exterior panel" and bask in the glory of what an exceptionally stupid person you are.

TeamBilly. Membership: d2, billy.

Debunking government agendas one conspiracy at a time.

What's next?

Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk


It's sometimes saddening that the laws of nature allow for someone as stupid as you to exist.

But anyway, let me know how you get on with the bowling ball puzzle. It's a poser, I know.


by 1&onlybillyshears

The prior model i posted circa 15 million posts ago. This includes some resistance estimates.

Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk

Shouldn't be a problem for you to quote it then.


by 1&onlybillyshears

Exterior panels getting spammed hard here. Clinging to the exterior panels on the inevitable descent. Nice analogy that.

Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk

It's not an analogy. It's what the report you yourself cited actually says.


by 57 On Red

It's not an analogy. It's what the report you yourself cited actually says.

Nice ad hom.


by d2_e4

Shouldn't be a problem for you to quote it then.

We are witnessing the decline of d2. You are asking for a calculation using a model that increases the collapse time. You are already at least 15% over the observed time. You already debunked NIST.

Now might be a good time for deuces to weigh in. Billy has suspicions about deuces after the interesting molten metal claim.

This is new my litmus test. Does deuces still (if ever) believe the towers collapsed?

Deuces... deuces...? ...

Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk


by 1&onlybillyshears

We are witnessing the decline of d2. You are asking for a calculation using a model that increases the collapse time.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk

I am asking the exactly the same thing I have always been asking, which is for you to show your working for how you arrived at a collapse time of 27 seconds. Reading comprehension ftw.

I am not particularly interested in what NIST said, or what you stubbornly claim NIST said. I am interested in what calculations Billy did to arrive at a time of 27 seconds.


by 1&onlybillyshears

We are witnessing the decline of d2. You are asking for a calculation using a model that increases the collapse time. You are already at least 15% over the observed time. You already debunked NIST.Now might be a good time for deuces to weigh in. Billy has suspicions about deuces after the interesting molten metal claim.This is new my litmus test. Does deuces still (if ever) bel

He mentioned that a plane hit the Pentagon so I'm guessing he doesnt actually believe that either. I can safely assume you dont believe the Pentagon was hit with an airliner or a missile?


I also like how Billy refers to himself in the third person, just in case we weren't convinced enough that he's batshit insane already.


by 57 On Red

It's not an analogy. It's what the report you yourself cited actually says.

No i mean you clinging to the story, i mean storey.

They do use those two words in that order yes.

Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk


Billy, how are you getting on with the bowling ball puzzle?


by d2_e4

I am asking the exactly the same thing I have always been asking, which is for you to show your working for how you arrived at a collapse time of 27 seconds. Reading comprehension ftw.

I am not particularly interested in what NIST said, or what you stubbornly claim NIST said. I am interested in what calculations Billy did to arrive at a time of 27 seconds.

Say what? Now you are not interested in what NIST said? But you just debunked the main conspirators, NIST! Dont back out now.

If you want to know about the 27 s you will have to go back into the thread. I advise against, it is self harm. It only increases the time beyond 15% above what you sincerely wish it were. Stick with +15%. Forget resistance. That's futile.

Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk


Good lord you're an insufferable twat.


by formula72

He mentioned that a plane hit the Pentagon so I'm guessing he doesnt actually believe that either. I can safely assume you dont believe the Pentagon was hit with an airliner or a missile?

tie fighter


by formula72

He mentioned that a plane hit the Pentagon so I'm guessing he doesnt actually believe that either. I can safely assume you dont believe the Pentagon was hit with an airliner or a missile?

No idea.

Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk


There are too many psyops out there for one person to wrap their head around. We should form teams. I pick d2, on the back of an historic operation.

Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk


by 1&onlybillyshears

There are too many psyops out there for one person to wrap their head around. We should form teams. I pick d2, on the back of an historic operation.

Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk

Sure. I bill by the hour or part thereof, let me know how you'll be paying.


Not talking to duncecap because I don't care about his thoughts on this, but for the sane people in the thread, I always thought this video laid out the physical evidence of flight 77 really well:

Of course, there's plenty more evidence. I'll never forget the night I made myself look through the pictures of the debris. You can't unsee some of that stuff.


by Gorgonian

Not talking to duncecap because I don't care about his thoughts on this, but for the sane people in the thread, I always thought this video laid out the physical evidence of flight 77 really well:Of course, there's plenty more evidence. I'll never forget the night I made myself look through the pictures of the debris. You can't unsee some of that stuff.

They promised 6 minutes of Newtonian physics.

Somehow I knew not to get too excited.

Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk


Billy, how are you getting on with the bowling ball problem? If you want me to join your team, you are going to have to start picking up some of the slack, and I really need your help on this one. Take your time, use a pen and paper if you need to.


I think Gorgonian and D2_e4 have caused Billy to have a psychotic break and he is now stuck in endless repetition mode.


by d2_e4

Billy, how are you getting on with the bowling ball problem?

He has a difficulty in relation to the existence of ball-shaped objects, if I recall correctly.


by 57 On Red

He has a difficulty in relation to the existence of ball-shaped objects, if I recall correctly.

He also objected to the concept of 'shape' iirc.


by 57 On Red

He has a difficulty in relation to the existence of ball-shaped objects, if I recall correctly.

Well he seems to have difficulty with flat exterior panels as well, so I don't really know where to go from here.

Reply...