USA Goes to War Against Iran
Time for a dedicated thread to the war.
How long will it last and what will be the probable outcome?
Is there a single active poster in this thread (other than Elway) who you would characterize as a Trump poster....
That's how I characterize a pro Trump poster: unwilling to say taking out Iran's grid is unacceptable.
"He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. For if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you." - Nietzsche
Mongo: *a paintrapist*
Mongo: *a bad faith lying imbecile*
Also mongo: why do people insist on insulting me for my raping instead of debating my lying?
Long story short, Mongo believes as long as you were never explicitly told no before you bang it doesn’t matter how drunk or high on paint fumes you got them to get there
To put it mildly, this dude is pure garbage
Long story short, Mongo believes as long as you were never explicitly told no before you bang it doesn’t matter how drunk or high on paint fumes you got them to get there
To put it mildly, this dude is pure garbage
JFC how are you still allowed to post here?
No one gives a **** who you think Elway is.
That's how I characterize a pro Trump poster: unwilling to say taking out Iran's grid is unacceptable.
"He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. For if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you." - Nietzsche
Most people in this thread think the IRGC are the good guys. So if the IRGC constantly attacks and destroys civilian infrastructure, then the "gotcha" that we can't do that because it would make us monsters like them doesn't really come across as good faith.
If we can all agree that the IRGC are monsters, then we can debate whether responding in kind to their main strategy is appropriate or not.
tbf targeting power infrastructure is the norm in war. throughout history Im pretty pro Ukraine but I was even arguing some guy crying about russia doing it in that thread. There's been some weak international law against it (post ww2?) but no one follows that.
I think it was just a dumb trump threat anyway I don't think he will even do it. Taco Tuesday. But with Russia's doing it for 5 years no one will really care that much. If your enemies are doing it and your not doing it your kind of putting yourself at a disadvantage strategically for no reason.
I mean trump is literally attacking cubas power infrastructure by blockading them as we speak. Russia is sending them oil in a big tanker about to arrive in a few days trying to break the blockade. things might get spicy if your into international conflicts. Its a strategy he's literally using against cuba right now
tbf targeting power infrastructure is the norm in war. throughout history Im pretty pro Ukraine but I was even arguing some guy crying about russia doing it in that thread. There's been some weak international law against it (post ww2?) but no one follows that. I think it was just a dumb trump threat anyway I don't think he will even do it. Taco Tuesday. But with Russia's do
Yeah I read this as well Russian tanker heading to Cuba what does Trump do ?
idk how bad is it for the environment if you sink 170k barrels of oil. im sure you just board it with marines
after watching the Israelis slaughter people with immense glee for 3 years, yes I want that country destroyed and I will readily admit it. Iran needs to teach them a lesson for all of humanity.I get that your Supremacy makes you think that the hundreds of thousands slaughtered in the name of Israel dont matter. and that they arent real people. and you would fully support Isr
You really think all humanity would learn a lesson from Israel being wiped off the map?
Nobody learns anything from conflicts like this, except for the ugliness of it the closer in proximity they are
You can eradicate this nation or that nation, this people or that people...the unaffected will shrug and move on. It has been like that since the dawn of time
Most people in this thread think the IRGC are the good guys. So if the IRGC constantly attacks and destroys civilian infrastructure, then the "gotcha" that we can't do that because it would make us monsters like them doesn't really come across as good faith. If we can all agree that the IRGC are monsters, then we can debate whether responding in kind to their main strategy is
We don't all have to agree: It's never okay for non-monsters to target civilians unless they're under existential threat, which modern nuclear super-powers aren't unless they're at war with one another.
When a country is facing complete conquest, then the door to natural law opens and if terrorism is a country's only way to survive, then it's basically the law of the jungle.... for them. Doesn't mean it's right or even their right to do so but it's an option we should expect. Same holds with the IRGC or Hamas.
You really think all humanity would learn a lesson from Israel being wiped off the map?
Nobody learns anything from conflicts like this, except for the ugliness of it the closer in proximity they are
You can eradicate this nation or that nation, this people or that people...the unaffected will shrug and move on. It has been like that since the dawn of time
yes, in the same way that humanity would have been better off if the European colonists were wiped out by the indigenous in 1492.
You can eradicate this nation or that nation, this people or that people...the unaffected will shrug and move on.
right, there is only one genocide that ever mattered.
Most people in this thread think the IRGC are the good guys. So if the IRGC constantly attacks and destroys civilian infrastructure, then the "gotcha" that we can't do that because it would make us monsters like them doesn't really come across as good faith. If we can all agree that the IRGC are monsters, then we can debate whether responding in kind to their main strategy is
you’re insane
imagine thinking the good guys are the ones who double tapped a school in a surprise attack under the flag of negotiations. #AmericaBad
how is that at all comparable to double tapping a gradeschool? how many people get executed in the USA every year?
what is this double tap nonsense anyway. do you have any source. Regardless it was one strike lol. IF they dropped two bombs it was still the same mistake
what is this double tap nonsense anyway. do you have any source. Regardless it was one strike lol. IF they dropped two bombs it was still the same mistake
what is this double tap nonsense anyway. do you have any source. Regardless it was one strike lol. IF they dropped two bombs it was still the same mistake
Satellites confirm a triple-tap. You also don't know what a double-tap means. It means hitting a target, waiting for emergency crews to come to the target and hitting it again. It's not one strike, derp.
sounds like a good idea. you generally want to kill more people when you drop bombs. unlucky there was a school beside a military complex. I know what a double tap means lmao I just figured it was victor propaganda that it actually happened .
My point was they didn't make two mistakes. it was still one mistake. as far as I know the only major one. you think their intel changed between "double taps" ? bringing up the double triple is meaningless. Its the same thing... its just victor propaganda. your falling for victor propaganda ....
