[extracted] New(?) 9-11 stuff
KSM got a plea deal. The guy who supposedly masterminded the 9/11 attacks is not getting the death penalty.
If you still
No point. More expenditure for no return.People believed and continue to believe that these coat hangers and tin foil landed on the Moon.Not a huge upgrade for 2026 thus far.Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
That's not strictly tin foil. It's aluminised Kapton, a thermal-insulation film developed by DuPont. It looks like gold foil, but that's because Kapton has an orange tint.
Please, inform us about your artemis space laser theory. No need for expert opinion.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
Billy, Billy, William. To read about the space laser theory you will need to read Dr. Wood's most excellent book. But... I think she hints in places that she thinks the Earth is round, so I am not sure she can be trusted. Not at all. She is definitely a ball lover.
Also Billy, you missed how I calculated the shape of the Earth that reconciles all of these contradictory horizon distance observations. Now Billy, tell us more about the lizard people. What shape is their home planet?
Billy, Billy, William. To read about the space laser theory you will need to read Dr. Wood's most excellent book. But... I think she hints in places that she thinks the Earth is round, so I am not sure she can be trusted. Not at all. She is definitely a ball lover.
I see. Well I have a copy of that book and nowhere in it does Dr Wood mention anything about space lasers, still less anything about your promised artemis 2 space lasers.
Furthermore, d2 said d2 will never buy book. D2 lie? Say it ain't so.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
Also Billy, you missed how I calculated the shape of the Earth that reconciles all of these contradictory horizon distance observations. Now Billy, tell us more about the lizard people. What shape is their home planet?
You, d2, claims "calculation of the shape of the Earth"?
We are in the presence of greatness, people.
First there came Eratosphenes.
Then there came Al-Biruni.
Finally there was d2_e4.
This explains why d2 hates experts, he supersedes them all! Except Newtonian mechanics. He is **** at that.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
I see. Well I have a copy of that book and nowhere in it does Dr Wood mention anything about space lasers, still less anything about your promised artemis 2 space lasers.
Furthermore, d2 said d2 will never buy book. D2 lie? Say it ain't so.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
Read between the lines, grasshopper. If you do the calculations using the inputs Dr Wood provides, you will see that there is nowhere they can be except space.
There are none those blind as those who will not see.
Read between the lines, grasshopper. If you do the calculations using the inputs Dr Wood provides, you will see that there is nowhere they can be except space.
There are none those blind as those who will not see.
Brilliant! Now, tell us more about the artemis 2 space lasers.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
You, d2, claims "calculation of the shape of the Earth"?
We are in the presence of greatness, people.
First there came Eratosphenes.
Then there came Al-Biruni.
Finally there was d2_e4.
This explains why d2 hates experts, he supersedes them all! Except Newtonian mechanics. He is **** at that.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
Yes, behold the beautiful toroidal earth, with its infinity of horizon distances at every point in every possible direction.
Brilliant! Now, tell us more about the artemis 2 space lasers.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
They have 16 settings, from "light stun" to "vaporise".
Read between the lines, grasshopper. If you do the calculations using the inputs Dr Wood provides, you will see that there is nowhere they can be except space.
There are none those blind as those who will not see.
As mentioned, I think Wood allows the possibility of a ground-based system targeted with an orbital reflector. Unfortunately there's no sign that directed-energy weapons even now have the power required to pulverise large buildings, which is why she wibbles on entertainingly about the use of cold fusion, a thing never yet achieved, to cover this slight wee problemette in her theory. You can say this much for her -- like Barnum, she knows there's one born every minute.
As mentioned, I think Wood allows the possibility of a ground-based system targeted with an orbital reflector. Unfortunately there's no sign that directed-energy weapons even now have the power required to pulverise large buildings, which is why she wibbles on entertainingly about the use of cold fusion, a thing never yet achieved, to cover this slight wee problemette in her th
You "think"?
Citation please.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
And how do the space lasers go, Billy? Yes, that's right, they go "pew, pew, pew". That's a good boy.
Self-trolling, an interesting coping mechanism.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
You're the only troll round here. All we get from you is deflection and projection. If you think the Earth is not a doughnut, you're just denying reality. The horizon distance calculations prove it beyond any doubt.
As mentioned, I think Wood allows the possibility of a ground-based system targeted with an orbital reflector. Unfortunately there's no sign that directed-energy weapons even now have the power required to pulverise large buildings, which is why she wibbles on entertainingly about the use of cold fusion, a thing never yet achieved, to cover this slight wee problemette in her th
Billy just learned that Wood is a ball fondler so he doesn't rate her any more. It's ok Billy, she'll come round to the doughy nuts eventually.
Also HOLY SHT this beautiful.This was taken by Atemis II Commander Reid Wiseman from of the Orion spacecraft's window.
This is my favorite so far. I find it interesting because I didn't initially even understand what I was looking at. The first interesting thing I noticed was that you can see stars in the photo. Typically, with a well lit foreground object it's difficult to capture stars visibly in a photograph. The difference in intensity is too great - you can capture the stars with a longer exposure, but the foreground object will be completely washed out - just a white blob. I eventually realized that this isn't a well lit object. This is the nightside of the earth, lit only by moonlight. There are many clues that this is the case, but the stars were the first thing I noticed that didn't make sense for a sunlit earth.
This photo is just a long exposure of the darkside of the earth lit only by moonlight. You can see both auroras in the north and south (bottom left and top right), and you can also see city lights on the surface. The horizon glow of sunlight along the bottom right is another clue.
As mentioned, I think Wood allows the possibility of a ground-based system targeted with an orbital reflector. Unfortunately there's no sign that directed-energy weapons even now have the power required to pulverise large buildings, which is why she wibbles on entertainingly about the use of cold fusion, a thing never yet achieved, to cover this slight wee problemette in her th
Bump.
Cite please. Thanks.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
A better question, well done. Good progress.
What evidence do you have that a human being has been beyond 75 miles altitude?
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
Just the usual stuff. Photos. Extensive documentation and media coverage of space missions. Extensive spending on publicly funded space missions. People observing manned space launches. The death of many people involved in space missions. People who have traveled into space documenting their own experiences. The improbability of a pointless conspiracy extending for more than sixty years and involving thousands of people in multiple countries.
If you are asking whether I personally have travelled into space, the answer is no.
Now answer my questions.
