[extracted] New(?) 9-11 stuff
KSM got a plea deal. The guy who supposedly masterminded the 9/11 attacks is not getting the death penalty.
If you still
Just the usual stuff. Photos. Extensive documentation and media coverage of space missions. Extensive spending on publicly funded space missions. People observing manned space launches. The death of many people involved in space missions. People who have traveled into space documenting their own experiences. The improbability of a pointless conspiracy extending for more t
Photos: not able to be verified or repeated by ordinary people outside of military/specialised corporate sector.
Space missions as seen on TV: not independently verifiable.
Funding: systems can be built without ever making it off ground, or in the event of launch can end up in the sea. More generally, an ideal cover for black budget projects.
Observation of launch: see above.
Deaths: would need full coroners reports for any claim of a person "dying in space".
People who have travelled into space: who? When? Where? Etc. A very few people.
Pointless conspiracy: not pointless. Cold war, cold war 2.0 etc. "Thousands" of people? Highly unlikely. Just a handful of military bods. File under psych warfare division.
Further, it is a huge industry. Lots of high end research jobs. Keep it going i say.
The correct question is thus:
Why would anybody believe this.
It is really a question of faith. You have faith.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
Photos: not able to be verified or repeated by ordinary people outside of military/specialised corporate sector.Space missions as seen on TV: not independently verifiable.Funding: systems can be built without ever making it off ground, or in the event of launch can end up in the sea. More generally, an ideal cover for black budget projects.Observation of launch: see above.Death
A condom would have prevented this post.
Many hundreds of people from dozens of countries have traveled into space.
What would constitute "verification" of space launches in your mind. You dismiss video footage out of hands. You dismiss personal experience and personal observation out of hand. You dismiss physical evidence out of hand. What evidence would convince you?
There is nothing else, that I can think of, dependent solely on blind faith, outside of conventional religion.
It is, in fact, a religion.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
Ok. There is no evidence that would convince you to change your view, but we are the ones whose beliefs are religious in nature.
Totally checks out.
Many hundreds of people from dozens of countries have traveled into space.
What would constitute "verification" of space launches in your mind. You dismiss video footage out of hands. You dismiss personal experience and personal observation out of hand. You dismiss physical evidence out of hand. What evidence would convince you?
"Personal experience"
Now where else do we hear of that?
"Hundreds" is very few. How many soldiers do you estimate have been involved in classified operations they can never speak of? A great deal more.
What physical evidence? There is none.
Video footage has the same problem as other testimony, there is simply no way to verify this.
It is you who should be recognising the scarcity of "evidence". Asking me what would convince me is like a religious zealot who asks what would convince me of an anthropomorphic God.
And ofc, Earth is measured flat. That is rather a problem for these "orbits".
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
Ok. There is no evidence that would convince you to change your view, but we are the ones whose beliefs are religious in nature.
Totally checks out.
Belief in space programs is totally dependent on belief in the say-so of authority. Thinking people ought to reject this outright as a matter of principle. And they do, in large numbers. Flat earthers are a small subset of space program deniers.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
As mentioned, I think Wood allows the possibility of a ground-based system targeted with an orbital reflector. Unfortunately there's no sign that directed-energy weapons even now have the power required to pulverise large buildings, which is why she wibbles on entertainingly about the use of cold fusion, a thing never yet achieved, to cover this slight wee problemette in her th
Bump again, cite.
I would like to see Dr Wood's opinions on this.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
Billy, I really feel you are not taking toroidal earth seriously enough. This is the biggest breakthrough in Earth shape science of the last 2,000 years. Wake up, sheep person!
No.
LOL what disability? I guess you don't know who that is. Too bad. You just don't get to know. He doesn't have a disability. He's just a disgusting ignorant boomer. Like you.
Yes. In fact, I actually have done stand up and do pretty well.
Ironically you are a huge imbecile. I have put off saying it, I hate to stoop so low, but your behaviour is quite unacceptable.
Literally couldn't care less what you think of me. You are among the dumbest human beings I've ever come across. And trust me, I've met some doozies in my debunking time.
Literally you can gfys.
Back in my old school common room we had a game called 'Japan Does Not Exist'. One person played the moron who started the game by saying, 'Japan does not exist,' the rest of us would give evidence for the existence of Japan and the moron of the day would make up any excuse to disbelieve the evidence. 'Atlases are just books of drawings. They're artefacts.' 'Satellite pictures are all faked. There are no satellites.' 'People who claim they've been to Japan are just lying. So are people who claim they're Japanese.' 'All history books that mention Japan are fake.' And so on. I don't know why that springs to mind.
Being a member of the dumbest and most irrational subset of a set of dumb and irrational people is not a brag.
Back in my old school common room we had a game called 'Japan Does Not Exist'. One person played the moron who started the game by saying, 'Japan does not exist,' the rest of us would give evidence for the existence of Japan and the moron of the day would make up any excuse to disbelieve the evidence. 'Atlases are just books of drawings. They're artefacts.' 'Satellite pictures
Perfect.
To be fair, there probably weren't when you were in school.
Yo D2, Rocco whats up?
The NASA livestream has been showing a live shot from the capsule for over an hour uninterrupted with people floating around in microgravity standing at wonky obtuse angles from each other, etc. Must be pretty simple to fake that these days.
I am sure broke brain bill will tell you that it's all pre-recorded like a movie or something.
I get it, but he'll just have to show us how to duplicate the effect. The loop thing is quite easy to disprove obviously. Of course, that doesn't stop him from denying it.
