[CoinPoker] - Official - Bringing the Game Back to Players

Is it against Coin ToS for UK players to play?

are there only bomb pot tables for plo? i don´t see normaal tables

***

CoinPoker: Who Really Controls Your Money

An Independent Investigative Report into Player Fund
Safety, Ownership, and Operational Risk
April 17, 2026
Important Notice: This report is compiled from publicly available sources including
company filings, regulatory records, investigative journalism by established outlets
(OCCRP, The Guardian, Thomson Reuters Regulatory Intelligence, Press Gazette), poker
industry publications, and forum discussions. All claims are attributed to their sources.
Where allegations are unproven or disputed, they are clearly identified as such. No party
has been contacted for comment in this independent compilation. This report does not
constitute legal or financial advice. Gambling involves risk. Nothing in this report should
be construed as an allegation of current criminal activity.
Why This Report Matters
Most players who deposit money at an online poker site think about one thing: the cards.
Is the software fair Are the games good Is the rakeback competitive
Very few ask the question that actually determines whether they will ever see their
money again: Who is holding it, and what do we actually know about them
This is not a trivial question. In 2011, Full Tilt Poker - at the time one of the most
respected poker sites in the world, staffed by professional players and beloved by
millions - collapsed. The US Department of Justice revealed that player funds,
supposed to be held safely in segregated accounts, had been systematically used to pay
operating costs, bonuses, and personal expenses to owners. Over $390 million in player
money was at risk. Players who had done nothing wrong, broken no rules, and had every
reason to trust the site, lost access to their funds for years. Some never recovered
everything.
Full Tilt's players were not naive. They were not reckless. They simply never thought to
ask who was really behind the site - and what those people might do if the businesscame under pressure.
CoinPoker in 2026 presents a strikingly similar dynamic. The platform looks polished.
The software, newly relaunched in March 2026, is genuinely impressive. The promotions
are generous. The ambassadors are credible poker professionals. Everything on the
surface invites trust.
But when you look behind the surface - at the real ownership structure, the
documented history of the people apparently running it, the regulatory framework
protecting players, and the recent signs of financial strain - a very different picture
emerges. This report lays that picture out, clearly and factually, so that players can
make an informed decision about how much of their money they are comfortable leaving
on deposit.
Section 1: What CoinPoker Is
CoinPoker launched in 2017-2018 as a crypto-native online poker platform, founded
publicly by Lithuanian-Australian businessman and poker personality Antanas "Tony G"
Guoga and Canadian poker champion Isabelle Mercier. The platform was built around
blockchain technology, with the stated goals of transparency, fast crypto payments, and
decentralised fairness through a provably fair RNG (Random Number Generator).
By 2026 it has grown into the largest cryptocurrency poker site in the world by traffic,
reporting over 200, 000 registered players. Games run around the clock across No-Limit
Hold'em, Pot-Limit Omaha variants, and tournaments, at stakes ranging from micro-
limits to $2, 500/$5, 000. Deposits and withdrawals are processed in cryptocurrency -
primarily USDT (Tether), though Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, USDC, BNB, Polygon, TRON,
and now Visa and Mastercard are also accepted.
The platform operates without mandatory KYC (Know Your Customer) requirements for
most players, meaning users can deposit and play with little more than an email address.
Player funds are held in cryptocurrency wallets controlled by the operator. The site
holds an Anjouan eGaming License (licence number ALSl-202412004-FI1), issued by the
Union of Comoros in 2025.
In March 2026, CoinPoker executed a full platform migration - described internally as a
"Level Up" - introducing entirely new software, a revamped rewards structure, and an
expanded ambassador roster including Patrick Leonard, Mario Mosböck, Bencb
(Benjamin Rolle), Nik Airball, John "apestyles" Van Fleet, YoH Viral, Mariano Grandoli,
and Brantzen Wong. Weekly player incentives exceed $1.5 million through the
CoinRewards system.On the surface, this is a thriving, growing, technically sophisticated platform. Now let us
look beneath it.
Section 2: The Ownership Question - And Why It's Been
Kept Deliberately Unclear
2a. The Founder Who Stepped Away
Tony G is the name most associated with CoinPoker's founding. He is a well-known
figure - a professional poker player, former Member of the European Parliament for
Lithuania (2014-2019), and serial entrepreneur who also founded PokerNews.com and
TonyBet. His public profile gave CoinPoker credibility in its early years.
However, multiple independent sources confirm that Tony G has since stepped away
from operational involvement in the platform. Exactly when he exited, what stake he
retains (if any), and who he sold to or transferred control to - none of this has ever been
publicly disclosed. This in itself is a red flag. When a founder leaves a company that
holds tens of millions of dollars of customer funds, those customers have a reasonable
interest in knowing who has taken the reins.
2b. The Legal Operator: A Shell in Panama
The official operator of CoinPoker is listed as Precise Interactive Inc., with related
entity Precise IG Solutions B.V. (registration number 162989, Schottegatweg Oost,
Willemstad) appearing in terms and conditions. Precise Interactive Inc. is registered in
Panama. These companies appear to have no publicly visible leadership, no named
directors in accessible filings, and no operational web presence beyond their connection
to CoinPoker.
Panama and Curaçao-registered shell companies are entirely legal and commonly used
in the offshore gaming industry. Their purpose, however, is typically to create distance
between the actual beneficial owners and the legal entity - making it difficult to
establish who is truly accountable if something goes wrong.
2c. The Real Operators: ClickOut Media and Finixio
Multiple independent sources - including a former employee, an affiliate company that
worked with CoinPoker, investigative journalists, and company filing analysis - point to
ClickOut Media Ltd (registered in Naxxar, Malta) and its associated entity Finixio Ltd
(registered in the UK) as the actual operators and likely beneficial owners of CoinPoker.ClickOut Media and Finixio were founded in 2018, both born in 1989 and based in the UK. They also hold directorships
through UK holding companies including SBM Holding Group Ltd and ARG Media Ltd,
according to the Malta Business Register and Thomson Reuters Regulatory Intelligence
reporting.
This connection was confirmed independently by:
Thomson Reuters Regulatory Intelligence (November 2023): A formal report
confirmed that the owners of Finixio also own ClickOut Media, and that running
crypto marketing through a Malta entity does not exempt the company from UK
Financial Conduct Authority rules.
Company filing analysis published in investigative reporting: SEO dashboards,
AccuRanker data, and company registries trace control of CoinPoker, CoinCasino,
and numerous related gambling and crypto sites to the same small group of
individuals.
A former employee, whose statement was published by poker affiliate site
YourPokerDream.com in February 2026 (the article has since been taken down -
itself a notable detail), directly stated: "The site (CoinPoker) is owned by Clickout
Media. They don't want anybody to know that because their sketchy behaviour
would impact the few legit sites they have. Everyone was warned not to mention
Clickout Media on LinkedIn and to use site names instead so they could hide."
It should be noted that former-employee testimony is by its nature unverified, and the
site that published it had its own financial grievance against CoinPoker (an unpaid
affiliate commission dispute of approximately $20, 000). However, the testimony is
consistent with the broader pattern of evidence from multiple independent sources, and
its disappearance from the internet shortly after publication fits a documented pattern
of critical content removal.
ClickOut Media has never publicly confirmed ownership of CoinPoker. CoinPoker's own
communications have never named ClickOut Media or Finixio. This studied silence about
who is actually running a platform holding substantial player funds is itself a material
concern.
Section 3: The Track Record of the People Behind It
This is the section that every CoinPoker player should read carefully. Because the
question is not just who owns the platform today - it is what that ownership history tells
us about how these individuals operate when there is money on the table.3a. Fake Celebrity Endorsements: Investigated by OCCRP and The
Guardian
The Organised Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP) - one of the most
respected investigative journalism organisations in the world - published a detailed
investigation into Finixio as part of its "Fraud Factory" series. The Guardian and multiple
international media partners covered the same story.
The investigation found that Finixio-operated websites had published fake news articles
falsely claiming that celebrities including Marcus Rashford, Adele, Martin Lewis, and
Jeremy Clarkson had endorsed cryptocurrency investment schemes. These fake
endorsements were used to funnel users toward online brokers, some of which were
subject to regulatory warnings for large investor losses.
When confronted by journalists, Finixio's CEO acknowledged running
"bitcoin landing pages" that sent users to online brokers. He said any celebrity
endorsements were a mistake "unaware of by management." The misleading content
was removed after reporters made contact - not before.
The OCCRP investigation also noted that the broker ForexTB - which he said
Finixio worked with as a "regulated company" - was part of a marketing network
alongside 24Options, which was banned from operating in the UK for using fake
celebrity endorsements and causing large investor losses.
The significance for CoinPoker players is this: the people apparently behind CoinPoker
have a documented history of using deceptive content to direct people toward financial
products, and of only cleaning up that content when journalists came knocking. This is
not ancient history. It is a pattern of conduct.
3b. Regulatory Warnings: Australia, UK, Denmark
Finixio has attracted regulatory attention in multiple jurisdictions:
Australia: The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) issued a
formal warning against Finixio for its activities.
UK: The Financial Conduct Authority, during its October 2023 crackdown on crypto
financial promotions, scrutinised Finixio extensively, according to Thomson Reuters
Regulatory Intelligence reporting. Finixio told regulators it had sold all crypto-related
assets - while simultaneously continuing to recruit for crypto promotion roles and
operating crypto marketing websites. Following press enquiries, Finixio rapidly
removed crypto mentions from its website and social media. eToro and Coinbase
both paused or investigated their relationships with Finixio after being approached
by journalists. The FCA-flagged Best Wallet - a crypto wallet app - has beenlinked by investigative reporting to the Finixio network.
Denmark: According to a user report published in a gambling industry forum, a
Danish investment website (mininvestering.dk) that was acquired by a Finixio-linked
entity was subsequently seized by Danish police after it was used to promote what
the poster described as fraudulent schemes. This claim is unverified by this report
but is noted as a data point.
3c. Meme Coin Presales: Millions Raised, Prices Collapsed
Investigative reporting - summarised by TheHolyCoins.com from a now-deleted series
by SEO investigator Timothy M. - alleged that the Finixio/ClickOut network ran a
vertically integrated meme coin operation. The model, as described, worked as follows:
1. Create or back a crypto token (examples cited include Pepe Unchained, Wall Street
Pepe, Dogeverse, Crypto All-Stars, Meme Index).
2. Use owned or influenced media sites - including Techopedia, 99Bitcoins,
CryptoNews, Business2Community, and ReadWrite - to publish promotional content
as if it were independent journalism, without disclosing shared ownership.
3. Direct investors toward Best Wallet (the FCA-flagged wallet linked to the network)
and Web3Payments (a payment bridge they reportedly control) to fund purchases.
4. Launch the token. Prices collapse shortly after. Investors lose money. The group
moves on to the next project.
In one documented case (Meme Index / MEMEX), investigative reporting found that
presale buyers actually paid more than the listing price, only 3.7% of tokens were
allocated to liquidity (ensuring a crash was mathematically inevitable), and the
whitepaper misrepresented the total token supply.
Pepe Unchained raised $73 million in its presale. Shortly after launch, users reported
being unable to access tokens via Best Wallet, and some described being directed by
Telegram administrators linked to the project to hand over their 12-word wallet seed
phrases - a classic technique for stealing crypto.
No criminal convictions have been publicly recorded against them, or their
companies in connection with these activities. All allegations above are drawn from
published investigative reporting, not from this report's own legal conclusions.
3d. Suppression of Critical Reporting
Perhaps the most telling pattern is what happens when critical reporting emerges:
The original Timothy M. investigation series on recleudo.com - which formed thebasis of much of the above - was taken down entirely, no longer publicly accessible
as of late 2025.
The YourPokerDream.com article about CoinPoker employee testimony was
published in February 2026 and disappeared shortly after - returning a 404 error by
the time this report was written.
Press Gazette published a major investigation in March 2026 titled "The SEO
parasites buying, exploiting and ultimately killing online newsbrands." Shortly after
publication, articles exposing ClickOut Media were temporarily removed from
Google's search results following DMCA takedown complaints filed by an anonymous
entity. Google reinstated the articles within approximately 48 hours after the
complaints were found to be improper.
Multiple YouTubers covering these topics have reported receiving cease-and-desist
letters.
A pattern of making inconvenient information disappear is not evidence of wrongdoing.
But it is evidence of a culture that prioritises concealment over transparency - which is
precisely the opposite of what you want from an entity holding your money.
3e. Financial Position: Losses, Mass Layoffs, Unpaid Bills
ClickOut Media's most recently available financial data (year ending September 30,
2024) shows:
Turnover: £40 million
Declared loss: £3 million
Tax paid: Zero
A company with £40 million in revenue declaring a loss and paying no tax has, by
definition, significant costs eating into its revenues. The structure of such companies -
multiple entities across multiple jurisdictions - can make it extremely difficult to
understand the true financial position.
More alarmingly for CoinPoker players, multiple former employees and affiliate partners
have described significant recent financial difficulties:
Around Christmas 2025, approximately 90% of ClickOut Media / CoinPoker
employees were reportedly dismissed without warning, according to multiple former
employees who contacted YourPokerDream.com.
YourPokerDream.com - a poker affiliate site - reported being owed approximately
$20, 000 in unpaid commissions by CoinPoker, with no response to repeated contactattempts, and announced it was preparing a lawsuit.
A second former employee stated that both ClickOut Media and CoinPoker were
"experiencing significant financial difficulties and making every effort to reduce
costs as quickly as possible."
A previously prominent CoinPoker affiliate contact named "Michael 'Mike'
Ashkanasy" has been reported by multiple sources to either no longer exist or to
have never existed - with queries to his contact details going unanswered.
None of this proves that player funds are at risk today. But it describes a company under
serious financial pressure - and history tells us that offshore operators under financial
pressure are precisely when player funds become vulnerable.
Section 4: The Regulatory Framework - Or Lack of It
CoinPoker holds an Anjouan eGaming License, issued by the Government of Anjouan
in the Union of Comoros in 2025 (licence number ALSl-202412004-FI1). Previously, the
platform held a Curaçao sub-licence, but this expired in January 2025 when Curaçao
overhauled its entire licensing framework, requiring all operators to obtain a direct
licence from the new Curaçao Gaming Authority. CoinPoker chose not to apply for the
new Curaçao licence and moved to Anjouan instead.
This choice is telling. The new Curaçao framework - while still far from the gold
standard of UKGC or Malta MGA regulation - introduced stricter requirements including
local representation, AML procedures, and player protection measures. Anjouan, by
contrast, is widely described in regulatory circles as the most minimal offshore option
available: a flat fee of around 17, 000-18, 500 per year, no local presence requirements,
four-to-six week approval, and enforcement that is essentially non-existent.
For CoinPoker players, this means:
No independent dispute resolution: If the operator refuses a withdrawal and cites
compliance reasons, there is no practical regulator a player can meaningfully
complain to.
No segregation requirement enforced by law: The Proof of Reserves (discussed
below) is a voluntary transparency measure, not a legal requirement backed by
regulatory enforcement.
No compensation scheme: Unlike bank deposits (covered by schemes such as the
UK's FSCS up to £85, 000), crypto held on an offshore gambling platform has no
insurance or government-backed protection of any kind.Broad operator discretion built into Terms: CoinPoker's own terms explicitly
reserve the right to delay, reject, or reverse withdrawals for a wide range of reasons
including AML, fraud investigations, "prohibited practices, " and source-of-funds
queries. In practice, under Anjouan oversight, these clauses can be applied with
virtually no external check.
The site is listed as an unlicensed or illegal operator in certain US jurisdictions including
by the Louisiana Gaming Control Board - consistent with its offshore model but relevant
to anyone in such jurisdictions considering depositing.
Section 5: The Proof of Reserves - What It Shows and What
It Doesn't
In August 2024, CoinPoker published what it described as an industry first: a public
Proof of Reserves (PoR) report, accessible via its "Trust" section at
coinpoker.com/trust-coinpoker/. At that time, the figures showed approximately $15.8-
16.3 million in player deposits, with total reserves of approximately $16.75-17.44 million
held - a coverage ratio of around 105-110%, with the excess providing a liquidity buffer
for withdrawals.
Importantly, approximately 60% of assets were held in cold wallets (offline, physically
secure storage), with the remainder in hot wallets for withdrawal processing. The
operator partnered with Fireblocks - a reputable institutional digital asset security firm
- for vault management, using Multi-Party Computation (MPC) technology that splits
private keys so no single individual can access funds unilaterally.
These are genuinely positive features. The cold wallet allocation and Fireblocks
partnership represent meaningfully better security than many offshore crypto
operators.
However, players should understand what the Proof of Reserves does and does not
guarantee:
What it shows: At the moment of the snapshot, the operator held sufficient
cryptocurrency to cover all declared player balances, and those wallets are publicly
verifiable on the blockchain.
What it does not show:
Whether the declared list of player balances is complete and accurate. CoinPoker
uses public wallet address disclosure, not a Merkle tree proof. A Merkle tree
approach (used by major crypto exchanges like Binance) allows each individualplayer to cryptographically verify their own balance is included in the total.
CoinPoker's method allows you to verify the total assets exist, but not that your
specific account is counted in the liabilities.
What happens between snapshots. The 2024 PoR was a point-in-time disclosure. As
of April 2026, no updated PoR figure has been publicly published despite significant
reported growth in player numbers and deposit volumes. If player funds have grown
substantially while the PoR has not been updated, the current coverage ratio is
simply unknown.
Whether the wallets will remain segregated from corporate funds under financial
pressure. This is precisely the mechanism that failed at Full Tilt: the funds existed
and were technically segregated - until they weren't. No independent third-party
audit of the PoR has been publicly referenced. There is no ongoing verification by a
body independent of the operator.
The PoR, in summary, was a positive step in 2024. Its apparent stagnation since then -
particularly as the platform reports rapid growth - is a concerning gap.
Section 6: The Full Tilt Moment - Could It Happen Here
In 2011, Full Tilt Poker's owners told players their funds were safe. They had segregated
accounts. They had industry credibility. They had professional poker players as
ambassadors and faces of the brand. They had a sophisticated platform and millions of
loyal users.
What they also had - unknown to players - was a business under financial pressure,
owners who had been drawing from player funds to cover costs and personal expenses,
and a regulatory framework (Alderney) that turned out to provide almost no meaningful
protection when the US Department of Justice came knocking.
The parallels with CoinPoker's current situation are not exact, but they are striking:
Credible professional ambassadors who give the platform legitimacy but who are
not, and cannot be, responsible for the financial management of player funds.
An offshore licence with minimal enforcement power.
A reported Proof of Reserves from a point in time, without ongoing independent
verification.
A parent company under reported financial pressure, including mass layoffs,
unpaid affiliate commissions, and declared losses.Ownership deliberately obscured behind shell companies, with the actual
controlling individuals never publicly named by the platform itself.
A history of deceptive practices in adjacent businesses, documented by major
investigative outlets.
A culture of suppressing critical reporting through takedowns, legal threats, and
the quiet disappearance of inconvenient content.
None of this means that CoinPoker will collapse, or that player funds will disappear.
Many offshore operators have operated for years without incident. The platform has
been running since 2017-2018 with no verified mass-withholding event recorded as of
the date of this report.
But the question is not whether a collapse is imminent. The question is: if the people
controlling this platform decided, for any reason, to restrict access to player
funds, what protection do you have
The honest answer is: almost none.
There is no regulator with real enforcement power. There is no compensation scheme.
There is no mandatory independent audit. The ownership is opaque. The financial
position of the controlling entity has shown signs of stress. And the individuals
apparently in control have a documented history of deceptive practices in other
contexts.
Section 7: What Players Should Do
If you currently have funds on CoinPoker, or are considering depositing:
1. Withdraw regularly. Do not leave large balances on deposit beyond what you need
for active play. Treat it like a casino cash desk - take money off the table when you're
not at the table.
2. Test before trusting. Before making a significant deposit, make a small one and
immediately withdraw it. Fast, frictionless withdrawals are a genuine green flag. Any
delays, additional documentation requests, or unexplained holds are a serious warning
sign.
3. Document everything. Record your deposit and withdrawal transactions on the
blockchain. Screenshot your account balance regularly. If you ever need to make a
claim, this documentation is your only evidence.
4. Do not treat the platform as a bank. CoinPoker itself states in its Terms that theWallet is "a virtual account (not a bank account)" and that no interest is earned. Treat it
accordingly - money you leave there is money you are trusting to an unregulated third
party.
5. Monitor the Trust section. If CoinPoker publishes an updated Proof of Reserves,
that is a positive signal. If the section remains static while the platform grows, that gap
widens.
6. Be aware of your terms. The platform reserves the right to delay or refuse
withdrawals for a wide range of reasons. Read the full Terms of Service, AML Policy, and
Payouts Policy (available as public PDFs on the site).
7. Diversify. If you play online poker with crypto, consider spreading funds across
multiple platforms rather than concentrating everything in one place - particularly one
with the ownership questions outlined in this report.
Conclusion
CoinPoker is a technically impressive platform. Its software is genuinely modern. Its
promotions are real. Many thousands of players have used it without incident. The
Fireblocks custody arrangement and cold wallet allocation represent genuine security
measures.
But the platform presents a fundamental transparency problem that no amount of good
software can solve: the people who actually control it have gone to considerable
lengths to ensure you do not know who they are.
What we do know - drawn entirely from published investigative reporting, company
filings, and regulatory records - is that the entities apparently behind CoinPoker have
been:
Investigated by OCCRP, The Guardian, and Thomson Reuters for deceptive
marketing practices involving fake celebrity endorsements
Warned by regulators in Australia and scrutinised by the UK's FCA for non-compliant
crypto promotion
Linked to meme coin presales where investors lost substantial sums
Reported to be experiencing significant financial difficulties including mass layoffs
and unpaid commitments
Actively suppressing critical journalism through takedowns and legal threatsDeliberately concealing their connection to CoinPoker from the public and from their
own employees on LinkedIn
Players who enjoy the platform are not being foolish. But they deserve to make an
informed choice - and that choice should include knowing that the entity holding their
money has a documented track record that would, in any regulated environment, have
attracted serious regulatory scrutiny.
The question every player should ask before depositing is not "do I trust CoinPoker" It
is: "do I trust the people actually holding my money - people I cannot name, in a
structure I cannot see, regulated by a jurisdiction that cannot meaningfully protect me"
In a regulated, transparent environment, that question has a clear answer. Here, it does
not.
This report is compiled solely from publicly available sources as of April 17, 2026,
including OCCRP (occrp.org), The Guardian, Thomson Reuters Regulatory Intelligence,
Press Gazette, TheHolyCoins.com, PokerIndustryPRO, GipsyTeam, WorldPokerDeals,
company filing records, and official CoinPoker site documentation. All allegations are
attributed to their original published sources. No legal conclusions are drawn. No
individuals are accused of criminal conduct. Readers should conduct their own due
diligence and consult appropriate legal and financial advisors. Information may change
rapidly - verify current status directly. Gambling involves risk of financial loss.
Copyright @Pokerbots1 on X

Why not have an option to choose? You can easily have a drop down where the player can choose either percentage or x in BBs, like most sites do

Yeah not having the multiplier option available is terrible.

There are regular tables. You can even filter out the bomb pot tables

Is the Android app safe to install?

Todd Witteles has today retweeted an article about CP. Its not pleaseant reading, I dont personally have any problems at all regarding CP and have found their withdrawls process and general customer support to be excellent thus far, but the article does ask some questions so will be good if CP respond to this one i think

That exact same report was on this thread yesterday and for some reason has been removed (I believe the only entity that can remove is twoplustwo and they’ve been asked directly about the reasoning but failed to respond so far)- part of that report specifically dealt with suppression of adverse reporting

For X-less people like myself...
Maybe someone can (re)post a link to the article?

Surely 2+2 isnt deleting posts containing articles about poker sites right?
Or is that is different when that particular site is buying advertisement?

Link - https://x.com/pokerbots1/status/2045328327871729917?s=46&t=zFsbCrKAVQfkimbZvSEy-A

Your other question is for twoplustwo to answer they’ve been asked

https://x.com/pokerbots1/status/2045398642224238606?s=46&t=zFsbCrKAVQfkimbZvSEy-A

You posted a full report of 4,227 words without a link to the original. It was signed off with "Copyright @Pokerbots1 on X".

I deleted it and PMed you to tell you this and suggested that if you repost, give a short precis, with a link to the original, to avoid any copyright issues.

Unfortunately, I did not notice that you have not yet been given access to full PM facilities, but you still receive PMs from moderators, so you know this.

"So you know this" . you presume too much notifications have never worked so I "know" nothing bar the tag I dropped on X for clarity

Well, the other question has been answered

The links dont work for me, it tells me the page doesnt exist
Maybe thats because I dont have an X account (which i refuse to get btw) but usually I am able to open those links to X.

But yea, I was hoping that someone had a link to the original article/report
That way CoinPoker support would also be more inclined to respond.

The only link is the one I’ve given - I can assure you CoinPoker are aware of it wether they choose to respond on X/Here or not at all who can say 🤷‍♂️
I’ll gladly post it in full here again but pointless if it’s just getting taken down again - so maybe they’d (TwoplusTwo) advise it’s their forum and rules ?

Hurry up w dl hh. Wtf taking so long.

Kettle? Black?

AI Overview

Copyright

... the original creator automatically owns the legal rights to their written words from the moment they post, protecting them from unauthorized reproduction.

Reprinting a long, thoughtful post in a different publication requires the original author's permission.

A forum owner removing a post for violating community guidelines is a standard exercise of their license to manage content.

Other users might be allowed to quote small sections of your post for review or discussion under "fair use" principles. ...

Mike nobody’s trying to pick a fight with you here - I posted something, wasn’t aware of any rules i was breaking and thought it was informative (and it was left for people to make up their own minds) - and yes you did presume I had seen PM’s and I genuinely hadn’t (“you know this”) - my notifications have never worked… it’s 404 and circle spinning so all I see is the post removed, nothing more - and that’s why you were tagged on X but TwoPlusTwo doesn’t seem to be so active on there so obviously that was missed
As the other forum member said Todd Witteles had reposted the same report there were genuine questions that coin probably should address and not everyone’s on or wants to be on X (it appears to be under new management so it’s in effect a new operation holding 10’s millions of players funds with an opaque ownership (that appears to have a chequered past) and in the space/jurisdiction it’s in - the press of one button and every 💰 could be gone without much recourse - nobody is saying that’s what will occur or that anybody’s doing anything wrong - but it’s worth being aware of the risks (not just the marketing) with all factors taken into account … nothing more

As you now state that you are the author of the "independent report", I have undeleted your subject post.

Thank you and maybe they’ll address it as everybody (Coin, Ambassadors) are very vocal with the marketing … not so much the rest

I believe so yes

Read the t+c’s …, now ask CoinPoker to clarify

I would expect one of the above named to just reply with "they were just goofing around" if the house burns down.

When's Rush & Cash slated to start?