My results of grinding 2NL 5NL 10NL 25NL 50NL 100NL
Hello everyone, I want to share with you my 20 days result with 50$ deposit on GGpoker
2NL was awful, after like 15k hand
Just play hu4rollz
I dont get why anyone playing professionally would waste time grinding NL25 just to prove a point. Headsup is the purest form of poker and a great way to settle your differences.
He's a studied HU player who plays only HU, I'm a player who never played a HU, basically there is no HU format on GG, do you think it's fair to set up a match between a player who plays only HU vs a player who never played a HU? Do i start learning HU ranges and sh*t right now just to play him that you think is fair?
We wouldn't have a problem with him at all but he comes to blogs with big mouth to berate others work by troll/ironic replies like he was really much better, which isn't true, again what he believes is just delusional and he's playing in shady soft app games and believes his skill level is enough to beat 6max format on GG 25NL or higher, just pure delusional
xD lmaoooooooo
After that challenge finally these folks will start to respect my work on GG, go play 25NL hahahahaha i wanna laugh at your results
He's a studied HU player who plays only HU, I'm a player who never played a HU, basically there is no HU format on GG, do you think it's fair to set up a match between a player who plays only HU vs a player who never played a HU? Do i start learning HU ranges and sh*t right now just to play him that you think is fair?
What's there to learn? Just play everything in position and be more careful OOP 😆
Seems like ai slop. Logically, if playing bad players is good, shouldn't your goal be to play as many as you can for as long as possible? And if playing bad players is bad shouldn't your goal be to never play them?
Well i always respected his ability to be bad at poker but still win by playing bums, he's a real hustler but problem starts when he comes to my blog and replies in a toxic/ironic way to berate my thinking or my achievements, then he gets reality check
Gonna start a session in about 30min, even tho im not really feeling like playing right now it's still Saturday
Roll right now
We should play like Mozart writing his Requiem, or Michael Jordan playing his 63-point game against the Celtics in '86
Nice, as i said that i punted a stack
He's a studied HU player who plays only HU, I'm a player who never played a HU, basically there is no HU format on GG, do you think it's fair to set up a match between a player who plays only HU vs a player who never played a HU? Do i start learning HU ranges and sh*t right now just to play him that you think is fair?We wouldn't have a problem with him at all but he comes to bl
HU is the simplest to memorize the preflop ranges, and I don't think Banana would even care if you printed them all in front of you. Postflop is the same skillset of wide range spots BvB for example, but with positions inverted. You being super good but not feeling you would figure it out easily, vs a crappy app bumhunter, seems odd tbh.
He wont do it man. Hes too puzzy and ghey
Seems like ai slop. Logically, if playing bad players is good, shouldn't your goal be to play as many as you can for as long as possible? And if playing bad players is bad shouldn't your goal be to never play them?
The "ai slop" actually seems very accurate. If you choose to not play in a game 6-handed game with 5 regs, but instead pick a game with 1-2 weak players/fish, you are by definition table selecting.
If you're chasing a specific whale on every table they play, and trying to get the Jesus seat on them at every table, you're bumhunting. Bumhunters will usually also only sit on tables where there is a huge whale.
If I see a whale playing, I would also try to get on that table and so would everyone else, so I'm not hating on it, but there is clearly a difference between table selecting and bumhunting.
If you're only winning because you're bumhunting, it's most likely also true that you're not one of the better regs in the pool, but at the end of the day who cares? If you're trying to make money in poker, you gotta do what you need to do.
Yeah, that's why bumhunting is a bannable offense on many sites, while normal table selection is perfectly acceptable
rakeback is included too yeah but you're delusional if you think you can beat even 25NL on GG, well try it, set up a prop bet, you can choose there Bankroll Challenge timeline and the goal, everyone can track your progress in real time and we all can bet
gg is one of the softest site though... why would you think a long time pro can't beat nl25?
coz im a bumhunter who never plays higher than nl100, who never played a 6max hand ever and I have a 9 to 5 job....apparently
im glad to be a part of this amazing thread.
gg is one of the softest site though... why would you think a long time pro can't beat nl25?
You know Daniil Vasilev, a high stakes pro almost same level like Linus etc, once he made a challenge on GG playing 50NL RnC, i was frequently watching his challenge was all the time negative, i even went to his stream and asked him what was the problem, was GG pool hard or what, he answered somewhat like this "Yes, problem with GG is that there are too many breakeven players" then he removed challenge and never played on GG again.
All I'm saying that beating GG isn't as easy as you may think, for you maybe it is, some people told me that you're legit unlike other guys here, they praised you Xeno so i don't want to attack you but what you write is clearly BS to me I have feeling that you have basically no clue about what are you talking about
Statistics show that average GG regs winrate is negative compared to other sites, basically every other site shows that average regs winrate is positive, how can you say pool is soft when clearly regs win less on GG in terms of bb/100 compared to all other sites?
Also this Banana guy is no way Vasilev's level, nor "a long time pro" as you described, lets be real this guy is just APPKING bumhunter, we should call everything by it's name
I'm done here with him, he takes too much time, i want to concentrate on my progress, if he really wants to prove something he can make a challenge and beat NL25 but he should be honest with himself and with us, no cheating and no chip dumping, if he really beats 25NL on GG then i will change my mind about him and will say that i was wrong, i will say that he's better than i thought he was and he has some skills but i highly doubt he can beat NL25 until then this topic is closed for discussion, i don't want to continue this BS, i need to concentrate on my journey and on my goals here.
lmao my posts really traumatized this ninja. tf i need to prove. every month i make more from rb than he does grinding the games. wassup homie. straight fax
Facts
gg is one of the softest site though... why would you think a long time pro can't beat nl25?
You know Daniil Vasilev, a high stakes pro almost same level like Linus etc, once he made a challenge on GG playing 50NL RnC, i was frequently watching his challenge was all the time negative, i even went to his stream and asked him what was the problem, was GG pool hard or what, he answ
Yes, table selecting is almost the same as bumhunt. I understand that there is a small difference, but both should be banned. If you want to improve, you should try to win against everyone. Those who tableselect or bumhunt are not goodplayers. I guess that u are scared nit who hitand run super fast when got some coolers agains top regs.
Yes, table selecting is almost the same as bumhunt. I understand that there is a small difference, but both should be banned. If you want to improve, you should try to win against everyone. Those who tableselect or bumhunt are not goodplayers. I guess that u are scared nit who hitand run super fast when got some coolers agains top regs.
When i see table full of regs i understand there isn’t a mathematical chance of beating the rake even if i outperform other regs, but if i see there is a table with 1-2 fish now i understand table can be profitable
I don’t even look at fishes nicknames or i don’t even care who they are, i never sit at tables to play a specific player, i decide to play because table is profitable
Either you guys lack common sense or ragebaiting
He has 1 post, guy is clearly ragebaiting
So, in your opinion, it is impossible to win if there are more than one reg at the table? That whole mindset says a lot about your game and playing style. You are right, this is my first post even though I have occasionally read this forum for a while. Sorry if my opinion caused you any discomfort.
