USA Goes to War Against Iran

USA Goes to War Against Iran

Time for a dedicated thread to the war.

How long will it last and what will be the probable outcome?

02 March 2026 at 06:37 PM
Reply...

5591 Replies


Earlier posts are available on our legacy forum HERE

by pokerandfootlover
by Trolly McTrollson

lolz, threatening to directly insert US troops into the fighting and possibly trigger WWIII would have been absolute madness, and bad-faith conservative clowndicks like you would be the very first to bitch and whine if Biden had done so.

This is the exact clown-level thinking that led to Ukraine being invaded in the first place. Putin preys on people like you; you are his usefu

lol, so your plan is to play brinksmanship with an elderly strongman dictator with nukes and hope that he cares more for his family and his girlfriends than he does for staying in power? Brilliant stuff from this new guy.


by pokerandfootlover

This is the exact clown-level thinking that led to Ukraine being invaded in the first place. Putin preys on people like you; you are his useful puppet as much as many Republicans are. Putin built up in 2018 for invasion too, 100K troops and thousands of tanks. Trump threatened to bomb Moscow if he invaded, said he wanted peace during his presidency and he wouldn't stand for it.

Complete & total fabrication! There was no troop buildup in 2018, and Trump made this boast that he threatened to bomb Moscow years later at a fundraiser when the war had already started - so that's total BS.


its cute how you guys think the Dems plan with Russia is so much different than the Repubs. they always wanted a war. they always wanted to vassalize Russia to steal its resources and Epstein its women.


by Victor

its cute how you guys think the Dems plan with Russia is so much different than the Repubs. they always wanted a war. they always wanted to vassalize Russia to steal its resources and Epstein its women.

It was under Obama . Obama sent blankets not billions and billions in weapons


the color revolution that kicked off all this violence happened under Obama


by campfirewest

What does going all in and wiping out Iran look like exactly?

I assume mongidig is migrating back towards his previous view that we should just drop a few nukes.


by Rococo

I assume mongidig is migrating back towards his previous view that we should just drop a few nukes.

Go back and read post #4708. You should read all the posts before making your “gotcha” response.


by mongidig

Go back and read post #4708. You should read all the posts before making your “gotcha” response.

You should really address the Elway situation if you want people to ever stop talking about it. Or, just be a coward forever.


by Trolly McTrollson

lol, so your plan is to play brinksmanship with an elderly strongman dictator with nukes and hope that he cares more for his family and his girlfriends than he does for staying in power Brilliant stuff from this new guy.

This doesn't seem like a particularly good faith summation of what he said. So unlike you.


by amplify

you have seen my dick is kind of a weird flex but there is a lot on the table here

Apparently SRM is a perv. Didn't know that until just now.


by geezerchess

Apparently SRM is a perv. Didn't know that until just now.

He's not, but the women he hangs out with might be.


by Victor

its cute how you guys think the Dems plan with Russia is so much different than the Repubs. they always wanted a war. they always wanted to vassalize Russia to steal its resources and Epstein its women.

The irony of this statement is that Victor is right; he is just blaming the wrong parties.

Putin's corrupt, kleptocratic regime would have fallen apart a long time ago under the weight of its own corruption and incompetence if it wasn't for nations like China, India and the Gulf States propping it up; in exchange for vassalizing Russia and taking its resources for pennies on the dollar.

And Putin caring about nothing but maintaining his own power, is all to happy to oblige.

As Russia continually falls into a state of disrepair and dysfunction, China is increasingly becoming the de facto (and increasingly outright) ruler of large parts of the resource rich East. And again, this is a price Putin is all to happy to pay for being propped up. And ironically, China actually admits this is exactly what they are doing, as payback for what they consider as the "Century of humiliation." by the West.


by amplify

He's not, but the women he hangs out with might be.

Fair enough. Never looked at it that way.


by Dunyain

China is increasingly becoming the de facto (and increasingly outright) ruler of large parts of the resource rich East.

And Africa!


by Trolly McTrollson

lol, so your plan is to play brinksmanship with an elderly strongman dictator with nukes and hope that he cares more for his family and his girlfriends than he does for staying in power Brilliant stuff from this new guy.

Putin cannot, ever, use nuclear weapons, because, if he did, he would lose his palaces, his stuff, his status, his power over others and his lifestyle, which is all he cares about. And he would quite likely get vaporised in the counterstrike. His continual histrionic threats to use nuclear weapons are merely a clownish admission of impotence.


by doodiewiz

Complete & total fabrication! There was no troop buildup in 2018, and Trump made this boast that he threatened to bomb Moscow years later at a fundraiser when the war had already started - so that's total BS.

The certainty in your post is eclipsed only by its ignorance:

December 2018

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/15/world...

Another source:

https://www.nine.com.au/world-news/ukrai...

Speaking at a Ukrainian military event, President Petro Poroshenko said Russia has deployed "more than 80,000 troops, 1400 artillery and multiple rocket launch systems, 900 tanks, 2300 armored combat vehicles, 500 aircraft and 300 helicopters" along their common border.

It is exactly as I described, and exactly the opposite of what you claimed. He built up a vast number of troops and equipment in 2018, all ready to go - same numbers and times as the 2021 preparation.

Any self reflection from you on how you get something so wrong and be so sure about it?


by mongidig

Go back and read post #4708. You should read all the posts before making your “gotcha” response.

Your position is that Trump should go all in an wipe out Iran, but rather than commit to nukes, your position now is that you have no idea what would be required to accomplish that objective. I guess that counts as progress for you. Baby steps.


by Trolly McTrollson

lol, so your plan is to play brinksmanship with an elderly strongman dictator with nukes and hope that he cares more for his family and his girlfriends than he does for staying in power Brilliant stuff from this new guy.

I would love to play poker with you! Just go all in every mid sized pot, you'll be folding because "I could have the nuts" every single time.

Don't you feel ashamed to be as much Putin's useful fool as Republicans are? More actually, since this whole war would not have happened if Dems in charge at the time weren't psyopped by not-even-clever Russian propaganda like you are?

Ironically, folding against Putin's bluffing has brought us closer to nuclear war - by creating a dangerous hot war and declining global conditions - than this super dangerous (lol!) brinkmanship you claim would endanger us. How is this not crystal clear to you? It boggles the mind.


by Dunyain

The irony of this statement is that Victor is right; he is just blaming the wrong parties.Putin's corrupt, kleptocratic regime would have fallen apart a long time ago under the weight of its own corruption and incompetence if it wasn't for nations like China, India and the Gulf States propping it up; in exchange for vassalizing Russia and taking its resources for pennies on the

Russia is doing far better than it was after the liberal compradors dismantled the Soviet Union and helped the West loot the country killing millions with disease and despair.


by Rococo

Your position is that Trump should go all in an wipe out Iran, but rather than commit to nukes, your position now is that you have no idea what would be required to accomplish that objective. I guess that counts as progress for you. Baby steps.

I do have an idea of what might be required but I don’t have the intel to know for sure. What I do know is you can’t negotiate with these terrorists.


by mongidig

I do have an idea of what might be required but I don’t have the intel to know for sure. What I do know is you can’t negotiate with these terrorists.

Don't keep us in suspense. Go on.


by amplify

He's not, but the women he hangs out with might be.

He admitted himself he is a perv. There’s nothing wrong with being a perv I just wish you people would learn to read before posting.

The problem isn’t that urine boy is a perv. My concern is how many females he has physically hurt given his level of belligerence.


by geezerchess

Fair enough. Never looked at it that way.

You’re like a little puppet. Try to think for yourself.


by mongidig

He admitted himself he is a perv. There’s nothing wrong with being a perv I just wish you people would learn to read before posting.

The problem isn’t that urine boy is a perv. My concern is how many females he has physically hurt given his level of belligerence.

I don't believe that you have any concern for women whatsoever other than as playthings for your own pleasure.

As an aside: Why do you refuse to address the Elway Controversy?


by Rococo

Don't keep us in suspense. Go on.

Take Kharg Island. Massive bombing campaign on the Iranian coast of Hormuz. Fresh rounds of leadership decapitations.

See if this makes them cry uncle. If not, start going after infrastructure and introduce US forces into the battle against Hezbollah.

Reply...