2028 ELECTION THREAD
Multiple yapping Rococo comments from grizzly bears to rice show a downward trajectory in his posting. And you are avoiding it like a hot potato. Truth hurts or in your case it seems to butt hurt you big time to the point of trying to deflect the discussion several times.
Multiple yapping Rococo comments from grizzly bears to rice show a downward trajectory in his posting. And you are avoiding it like a hot potato. Truth hurts or in your case it seems to butt hurt you big time to the point of trying to deflect the discussion several times.
I'm not "avoiding" anything. I haven't personally noticed an overall decline in Rococo's posting. I disagree with many of his posts, that's for sure. Rococo and I almost never align politically.
Do you agree with me that overall he is STILL one of the top-five posters in this forum?
And do you agree with me that this whole detrail BEGAN with this ad hominem attack on Rococo?
Eh. in a race without an incumbent, there is always a real chance that a presumptive leader for one party's nomination (e.g., Vance, VP or Rubio SoS) will implode for whatever reason. If Vance and Rubio imploded, the GOP race would be very open and the ONLY person besides Trump to receive 2024 GOP primary delegates was Haley. The chart has the dem side other people baked in re
Make it a great day!
“If we lose, people might investigate us"
is a helluva campaign pitch for "innocent" politicians.
I've already provided proof of grizzlies in NYC. I would posit there is a non-zero chance that one could escape and wander down a street.
I'm trying to get some math on a poker centric site, so I'll repost post.
Extrapolate further, please. There is a fanboy group closing their ranks and circling their wagons to unite as a group and take a defensive posture in response to an external threat, criticism, or crisis. Mind you a pissed off tiger might jump out of a zoo enclosure, but are one of these three grizzly bears more likely to break free and walk down the street or is it more likely to find a paid agitator in New York? Yapping Rococo seems highly confused at which is more likely.
Multiple yapping Rococo comments from grizzly bears to rice show a downward trajectory in his posting. And you are avoiding it like a hot potato. Truth hurts or in your case it seems to butt hurt you big time to the point of trying to deflect the discussion several times.
Got me at first now I see this is a clear troll
^ Ad hominem force strong in the fanboy group.
No addressing the substance of yapping Rococo grizzly bears posts here.
^ Ad hominem force strong in the fanboy group.
No addressing the substance of yapping Rococo grizzly bears posts here.
I would never have dreamed that a years-old, intentionally silly comment about grizzly bears in Manhattan would be my downfall. But let's see if you can make it happen. Please continue, but maybe just start a dedicated thread about how terrible my posting is. This digression doesn't seem to have much to do with the 2028 election.
On an unrelated note, did we have some disagreement in the past that I am not remembering? I can't imagine that we did, as I barely remember you posting at all, but maybe I have forgotten something.
^ Ad hominem force strong in the fanboy group.
No addressing the substance of yapping Rococo grizzly bears posts here.
Sorry where did I say your arguments are wrong because you’re a troll? I’m not sure you know what ad hom means.
But yeah “Multiple yapping Rococo comments from grizzly bears to rice” is a dead giveaway
I would never have dreamed that a years-old, intentionally silly comment about grizzly bears in Manhattan would be my downfall. But let's see if you can make it happen. Please continue.On an unrelated note, did we have some disagreement in the past that I am not remembering? I can't imagine that we did, as I barely remember you posting at all, but maybe I have forgotten some
This topic has mostly lost it's steam. Not a single fanboy wants to have a substantive conversation about your yapping posts. The score is something like below.
Hypocrites!
The fanboys parade themselves around as great conversationalists, but not a one will touch the hot potato of your stupid grizzly bear post. Not a one.
I would never have dreamed that a years-old, intentionally silly comment about grizzly bears in Manhattan would be my downfall. But let's see if you can make it happen. Please continue, but maybe just start a dedicated thread about how terrible my posting is. This digression doesn't seem to have much to do with the 2028 election.On an unrelated note, did we have some disagre
LadyBruin and wolfbook have it in for you for no apparent reason. It's very strange. wolfbook might be a bot or an alt imo.
^ another avoidance of discussing yapping Rococo's stupid declining posts. Who would have thought having a discussion about a weak ass grizzly bear post would be so hard for the conversationalists of this section. And for extra Ad Hominem shade throwing, my 10 year old account is now a bot.
Fanboy bootlickers are very funny..
^ another avoidance of discussing yapping Rococo's stupid declining posts. Who would have thought having a discussion about a weak ass grizzly bear post would be so hard for the conversationalists of this section. And for extra Ad Hominem shade throwing, my 10 year old account is now a bot.
Fanboy bootlickers are very funny..
I actually attempted to discuss this with you, and you completely ignored the post.
Here it is again for your dining and dancing pleasure:
I'm not "avoiding" anything. I haven't personally noticed an overall decline in Rococo's posting. I disagree with many of his posts, that's for sure. Rococo and I almost never align politically.
Do you agree with me that overall he is STILL one of the top-five posters in this forum?
And do you agree with me that this whole detrail BEGAN with this ad hominem attack on Rococo?
*
Make it a great day!
*the one by LadyBruin
^ You can't get to Exhibit Z of yapping Rococo's weak posts when you can get past the first Exhibit A.
The above post has no substantive discussion of the grizzly bear post. Still waiting for this to be addressed. Wow, 5,550 posts since Jan 2025, but can't discussion a grizzly bear post and acknowledge it was a piece of yapping junk.
I'm trying to get some math on a poker centric site, so I'll repost post.Extrapolate further, please. There is a fanboy group closing their ranks and circling their wagons to unite as a group and take a defensive posture in response to an external threat, criticism, or crisis. Mind you a pissed off tiger might jump out of a zoo enclosure, but are one of these three grizzly bear
Okay. Math! If a grizzly bear and a paid agitator are walking down a street, I am100% likely to recognize the grizzly as such and 0% likely to recognize the agitator (I don't believe they wear name tags (if they exist at all)). Given the known facts, I am much more likely to meet a grizzly. This is truth.
^ You can't get to Exhibit Z of yapping Rococo's weak posts when you can get past the first Exhibit A.
The above post has no substantive discussion of the grizzly bear post. Still waiting for this to be addressed. Wow, 5,550 posts since Jan 2025, but can't discussion a grizzly bear post and acknowledge it was a piece of yapping junk.
You found two posts out of a gazillion he has made over the past several years and concluded that his posting as a whole has gone down the drain?
Since I don't know anything about freezing rice or about grizzly bears in NYC, I'll concede for the sake of discussion that those two posts were awful.
Now, how does one conclude from those two posts that he has become a 'yapper'?
Now please answer that question plus the two questions in my previous post.
Thanking you in advance!
lagtight,
As I'm sure you realize, this poster is trolling. He isn't trying to have an actual discussion. If he wants to go on and on about how terrible I am, I suggest that you just let him do it. He will tire himself out eventually.
Remember what the dormouse said
Feed your troll
The dormouse was incorrect.
^ You can't get to Exhibit Z of yapping Rococo's weak posts when you can get past the first Exhibit A.
The above post has no substantive discussion of the grizzly bear post. Still waiting for this to be addressed. Wow, 5, 550 posts since Jan 2025, but can't discussion a grizzly bear post and acknowledge it was a piece of yapping junk.
why are you so uptight, bro?
You might as well direct your question to the main account. ladybruin = wolfbook
https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showp...
This was a less extreme version of the mongidig/Elway charade.
You might as well direct your question to the main account. ladybruin = wolfbook
https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showp...
This was a less extreme version of the mongidig/Elway charade.
Amazing.
You might as well direct your question to the main account. ladybruin = wolfbook
https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showp...
This was a less extreme version of the mongidig/Elway charade.
lmao
why is the wolf lady so mad?
