CoinPoker discussion

Also which prompts, you use AI to create content - ironic given the accusations you make at others during your harrassment ‘campaigns’ at least one of which resulted in death - and don’t include the prompts in the screenshots you make.

Show clearly where I ever said I engaged in a “harassment” campaign that resulted in death . See here you go again, nothing of the sort has ever been intimated quite the opposite and you’ve been told more than once in quite some detail that was a legal process that was carried out in accordance with all laws.

So where is this allegation based in any fact whatsoever ?

Remember you started the personal character assassination, because you didn’t like what was being said about coin coming up with the “threat to kill 2+2 mods” . That was pushed back on with information you yourself put in the public domain advising readers how to dupe immigration authorities and banks - that’s fair game because your only intent to distract from what was being said about CoinPoker by trying to smear me - NOTHING I did crossed any legal boundaries, you might not think I’m an overly nice guy but so what - it has no bearing on the message, you just went after the messenger .

This is totally consistent with your employers marketing / mindset . Deflect continually, “answer” but don’t resolve

Anyway as per the top of this post show where I harassed someone to death - another serious allegation made in in public on this forum and they continue to let you make them (whilst editing and removing posts that identify someone whose already identified as working for coin as working for coin and their first name from an article they posted - an article that specifically told everybody who you were on this forum I didn’t even have to create that link)

No not to silence - to show character … actual character not some made up “I’m going to allege something you said even though it has no basis in fact” . No definitely not to silence just to show who you are and the fact you were stupid enough to ever pen an article like that whilst living in that country

And im only clear about needing a binary answer - otherwise it’s just round and round the deflection track we keep on going

I use AI I don’t need it there’s a big big difference

There wasn’t much “doxxing” in Adam and Sam as owners of Clickout hence Coin . Can’t think of any “staff” though

And use “threats of violence” just another to add to the list - I’m really surprised Mike Haven is letting you continue with this barrage of untruths, where are the “threats of violence”?

Mike Haven

I’ve had …..

“Threatened to kill 2+2 mods”

“Used threats of violence”

“Harassed someone to death”

And more all thrown out there as allegations against me, and nothing is being moderated on. Fine if they were based on fact but they are simply untrue and Jspill continues to make them under your watch

And yes I’m sure AI can make mistakes so for anything I use it for I alter etc

As can RNG’s hence the need to have them continually certified - where’s coin’s certification ? Thats like getting stopped by the police with an out of date mot “officer it’s fine the vehicle was passed roadworthy by the last guy years ago”

Coin even write up about “uncertified” - when the certification runs out it is uncertified - or is certified in the past but expired a new standard 🙄 “ Without certification, players are trusting that an operator is following industry best practices and safeguarding fairness”

[image]mEZepGX.jpeg[/i

...]

Until there’s an answer on those 3 allegations laid out to Mike I’ll be holding off as this is pointless you obviously can just say anything you like - you deal with those clearly I’ll Re- engage

Let see how long he can hold off :p

Transparency: I don't have a dog in this fight and am only very mildly interested in the topic. I've never deposited on CP, only played some free rolls a while back to see what it was like. With that context, I have some constructive criticism for you. Take it or leave it.

The 'noise' of your posting style is completely drowning out any 'signal' you're providing with your posts. You've brought up some potentially interesting issues related to CP's management and TOS. But your aggressive tone, walls of screenshots, poor grammar, and lack of punctuation makes it impossible to follow your arguments. Frankly I'm not even sure why I'm still subscribed to this thread, I generally just scroll past your posts. And I guarantee you that no one cares about the death threat derail, that's just more noise piled on top of the rest.

Take it for what it's worth mate, just an anonymous lurker's two cents.

"just sharing" - no

https://x.com/andrewneeme
as you know very well - he promotes this spyware - for $ also asks 0 questions - just keeps promoting.

more attempted misdirection by you.. from the real story

It's still doxxing when the intent is malicious/to intimidate or gain leverage in an unrelated discussion, you've accused me of crimes on X and tagged the police in my country. I do copywriting on many sites, including rakeback.com where that article was and I'm a freelancer for various poker sites. You described this thread as a 'heated argument with Coin's guy' on X which is an attempt to undermine Coin, when I'm just posting my personal opinion on my personal account about your posts.

You guys linked it to many other random people as well who aren't influencers / affiliates. A player that just won $2 in a freeroll for example, and many on X. In that particular Neeme post he's not really shilling Coin just posting his own cash game results.

https://x.com/andrewneeme/status/2069870357948039176

X (formerly Twitter)

Andrew Neeme (@andrewneeme) on X

Also you've now hidden your Reddit history and changed the profile pic so it's less clear that you are the source of this info and operate a datamining site selling Coin HHs for profit, and have a personal vendetta against the site from before this.

Still can’t answer the question put to him (threats to kill), you’ve been given the reason why the article was referenced (Slugant pointed out you worked for coin and never made any secret of it, until his post I wasn’t sure of that) and it was added (for a character reference as you were making untruthful claims on mine and twisting things I was saying - had it of been an article by “James” with no reference to “I’m Jspill on 2+2” you’d of had grounds, but it did say that and I knew before posting no doxxing was occurring, and it showed your character … your literally coaching people on breaking the law ) and it’s now referenced in an X tweet where “I’ve accused him of crimes in his country” CORRECT that’s been made and it stands as will the full dossier I’m compiling to send to the Thai authorities on CoinPoker (because X tweets can get overlooked, dossiers landing on the desk make the job easy for them) - that’s not specific to you jspill but it would be my belief that certainly people in that jurisdiction are playing on CoinPoker and being marketed to both within that jurisdiction and on the wider net … and I’m not saying by you james/jspill thats for the authorities in that jurisdiction to look into who’s doing what, but certainly your article doesn’t help you ….. And all that’s occurred because you got stuck into this - you play stupid games lad you win stupid prizes

Here’s a BET James/Jspill

You consistently in this thread have made reference to the fact that answers have been given and I won’t accept them, that I’m being malicious and have some grievance against Coin - that your the “Good guys” all “About the Player”

My clear response is You/Coinpoker “say things” but they aren’t answers at all. That it’s just a way to get past issues without resolving them, that your hoodwinking your customers with those responses (worse actually giving them comfort when they are still exposed)

One of the biggest issues raised by me and it made it onto PokerNews/Poker Fraud Alert etc was the Jurisdiction one with USA/UK players excluded in terms and balances could be seized (you made reference to that in this thread about the banner I put out)

CoinPoker never addressed that on any official channels …. Until an hour ago

Now that’s an answer - here’s the problem it’s WORTHLESS and exactly fits what I’ve been saying all along

So THE BET

We both escrow £250, 000 with a mutually agreed third party (Solicitor) on this claim: CoinPoker’s forum statement that they “will not confiscate account balances on jurisdictional grounds” has no legal force against their own published Terms and Conditions, specifically Clause 1.3 and Clause 30.3.

To be resolved by written opinion from an independent gambling-contract solicitor within 14 days

So put up or shut up - I’m happy to increase the size of that wager if any of CoinPoker Ambassadors want to join in

For Joe Public reading this: in plain terms — what you’ve just been told is worthless. It doesn’t hold up, legally, against the contract you actually agreed to - and I’m happy to put my money where my mouth is on that

Wager posted on X with offer to increase to any other CoinPoker ambassadors - you’ve done a sterling job for CoinPoker James, they should reward you

Mind if I ask what happened that made you so bitter, @Transparency? I've been in the poker world for around 20 years, and I've never seen someone so toxic.

I’ve been in the business world nearly 40yrs and there’s very little toxic about this - sure some hide it, play nice to your face, talk eloquently maybe even go to church …. But when it all comes down to it business is business and I treat something like this in the same vein, I’m just up front about what I am I’ve never hid it. Go take a look at the Charlie Carrel Owen Messer dispute, two guys who were mates and look how toxic that got played out in public … claims of misogyny, anti semitism etc that’s in your poker world of 20yrs, it’s rampant with toxicity 🤷‍♂️

I was even more up front about it dealing with this as that was going to be the first angle that was used “he’s a bad guy” .. and you won’t hear me dispute certain elements of that but I won’t have my words twisted into something they’re not, not by these idiots

If they’d of engaged constructively at any point we wouldn’t be here, it took 6mths for me to actually post in public, then i ended up on podcasts with Carrel and Leonard where Leonard himself admitted I was very reasonable . But that all goes out the window when time and again your met with silence to valid questions (both Leonard and Carrel stated on that podcast they would come back with answers, neither did or tried to … so reasonable in your words becomes “toxic”)

We’re only in the position because of Coin, it’s not just me it’s an awful lot of people share the same views - if they don’t put it across as harshly as me that’s their call . And I suppose quite frankly I can’t let them away with it on my end because for them to say nothing/feed me a load of garbage and that to work would be them “getting one over on me” and that just isn’t going to happen .

Regarding this there are some players that you didn't screenshot, who say this new system is better than the previous one, even as a winning player.

This is one example. This is a new change that just started this month, more should come in, it's a bit dishonest that you only shared the negative ones for a brand new change.

Generally in poker, players tend to post negative things about any changes in rewards, there's not much incentive for someone to post online that they are happy with a poker site. If a site is great players generally want to keep it to themselves, or they're busy playing, you're claiming to have been in poker for decades - there are infinite threads full of negative comments about every poker site (most don't run a Discord, but on here / Reddit), even when those sites are very successful.

Correct you inserted yourself in this latest campaign - yes you are part of it by your own doing (and nothing I’m doing could be constituted as anything other than a public service re U.K. / USA / Thailand or anywhere else )

No Campaign of mine ever drove anyone to suicide that I’m aware of - I’m aware of a suicide related to a legal dispute as are you, that’s just a fact and one that carries no legal consequences for me then or now

The Doxxing we’ll agree to disagree on your free to take any action you want - I believe the post was edited whereas in my view many more serious matters weren’t

No requirement for anyone to disclose anything they don’t wish to (apart from AML requirements for that sum will be required with solicitor but they would be on a confidential basis between depositor and solicitor, no party would be privy to the others information) . I’d suggest someone like DLA Piper not some back street solicitor, client funds are protected and covered and it’s a clear decision on a clear question we’re asking so I don’t think we’re in any fear of “not getting paid out” . Solicitor fees relating to the transaction borne by the winner and deducted from the 500k remittance

RNG - “Certified RNG vs Uncertified RNG
Poker sites that value fair play can clearly display RNG certification.

An RNG certificate is a seal of approval from a certified testing body that affirms online gaming platforms’ adherence to RNG standards. These standards ensure that cards and game outputs are statistically random and unpredictable. This is a testament to a trusted gaming ecosystem and ensures fair and honest gameplay.

Without certification, players are trusting that an operator is following industry best practices and safeguarding fairness”

That’s Coinpokers own wording and CoinPoker do NOT have certification for their RNG - it’s uncertified and there’s no dispute about that regardless of the “well it was certified before for someone else” flannel

That was a personal dispute completely unrelated to Coin but you keep bringing it up in the context of Coin as if it's related, you did the same on X, it's a bit strange.

I don't want to take action and I can't anyway as I don't know your identity, I'm just saying it is still defined as doxxing, just ask AI or search Google. What was edited, not sure what you're referring to there.

Look I suggest anyone who wants to check should go and join the discord themselves - it’s the perfect “get out” … “oh only losers complain” there’s so many genuine people out there that feel they’ve been sold a pup / manipulated by the marketing vs what they got - but don’t take my word for it seriously if you actually are interested join the discord, look through the official thread, join X (though stuff sometimes gets moved elsewhere) - just make your own mind up and if you want to play blind and ignore all this just do that too . But just don’t be fooled like that guy this morning asking about the funds at risk who got an “answer” it was no more an answer than if it had been “the temperature outside is 25 degrees” - each would of been as useful to him in a dispute at a later stage [image]ZDEO4U7.jpeg[/i

[image]93pVXHx.jpeg[/i

[image]7ITZBZM.jpeg[/i

[image]KRHpAtj.jpeg[/i

...] ...] ...] ...]

I responded to the point the poster made about being in the poker world for 20 years and never having seen such toxicity - that response was limited to “the poker world” it’s you that (and that’s your modus operandi) are linking it to something else - albeit now you’ve brought it up Carrell is a prominent CoinPoker Ambassador and jumped into that pod with Leonard as he was worried about “his reputation” if there were queries over how CoinPoker were acting . He just wasn’t worried enough to “shoot a dm” as he promised or come back with any clarification on anything at all . When I brought it up on X it was because in my view the facts didn’t stack up with what he was promoting in his video … which I though ironic with the CoinPoker connection

Of course you can take action if you thought you were doxxed (I’d defend I don’t believe you were), people can’t say things that are actionable on the basis of retaining anonymity. Sites/forums etc have to hand over their details if doxxing/libel etc is being pursued . Mike said he edited so ask him

Ah thanks Mike. Since then you've posted the same thing that was edited though, name / country / company I work for rakeback.com and the same link

Because I don’t see any issue with it, And mike himself didn’t seem to see any either after he realised that your coin connection was common knowledge on the forum and specifically in this thread and that you wrote an article connecting your name to your forum profile

And you don’t get the difference here - that’s me clearly saying “that’s what I did, I stand by it, I’m not correcting it, and you take any action you feel you should”

Whereas you’ve been asked (In full knowledge of my position stated numerous times that I see it as libellous) to clarify your position on “threatened to kill 2+2 mods” - you had an easy solution to that to say “Sorry that’s not what you said and I’ll retract that and never repeat it” or in the alternative “Yes I said that and I stand by it” - but you just deflect from stating a position - and with those credentials you may just win “Coin man of the month”

Another player has a Mission worth 30% effective rakeback too, missed this one

Anyway the rewards program is nothing to do with whether a site is safe and reliable to play on, but it's just a cauldron of stuff that you post and always cherry picked. When the site partners with Triton or Battle of Malta and runs a huge series, you try to imply the site will have liquidity issues.

Meanwhile another major site literally has liquidity issues right now, claiming that the WSOP and World Cup increased withdrawal requests to the point where they aren't liquid enough to pay out as fast, yet you don't mention that.

Their 2+2 thread (which their staff don't monitor) is full of angry people, some getting their cashouts after around a week, some still waiting. Veteran players report this happens often when Bitcoin dips.

You've also referred to them as your 'mate' in posts before, and never criticize them / often praise them.

Dude wrote 4 paragraphs n didnt answer the question.

Why r u so butthurt? What is the lore behind transparency vs coinpoker!