** World Cup 2026 - USA, Canada, Mexico Thread **
Saw no thread was active yet while it starts tomorrow so I'd gave it a go
No real time for an extensive write-up but lets
Supporting corruption because it favours your team isn't a good look.
"Sweet, our best player gets to play" =/= "Corruption is good and I like it"
lol
Trump is an amazing negotiator. What a win for USA.
A great birthday present for #250.
it'll be hilarious if they manage to lose to lolbelgium anyway, but that match will almost certainly be mega rigged too so oh well, enjoy arbys
The outcome is correct, I guess, but the process seems completely ****ed. As far as I can tell, this is allowed under Article 27, but there doesn't seem to be any defined process for reviewing red cards for suspension of the one-game punishment, nor any protocol for explaining why a decision was made. It just seems like a provision that lets FIFA do whatever it wants with no explanation.
The outcome is correct, I guess, but the process seems completely ****ed. As far as I can tell, this is allowed under Article 27, but there doesn't seem to be any defined process for reviewing red cards for suspension of the one-game punishment, nor any protocol for explaining why a decision was made. It just seems like a provision that lets FIFA do whatever it wants with no
Insanely opaque. There needs to be a transparent review process for improper VAR usage.
housenuts already got the toosh cred
LOL if youre going to do this just rescind the red card saying the decision was wrong, don't ****ing do this as it does nothing but yield more suspicion and questions
Article 27 let's them suspend the suspension. Doesn't seem to give them the ability to rescind the red card.
LOL if youre going to do this just rescind the red card saying the decision was wrong, don't ****ing do this as it does nothing but yield more suspicion and questions
I agree with this as per my earlier post. It appears FIFA don't though. I guess it's whatever, we all know their corrupt and nothings going to change that. It wasn't a red card and everyone would have applauded if they had fully rescinded it on an appeal or something along those lines. They don't do that though.
Wonder if the VAR man is going to have to help USA vs Belgium. He had better b/cos I bet on them to make the quarters pre tournament.
Does anyone here legitimately believe that the red was awarded correctly?


