2028 ELECTION THREAD

2028 ELECTION THREAD

06 November 2024 at 06:20 AM
Reply...

663 Replies


Earlier posts are available on our legacy forum HERE

by Rococo

You might as well direct your question to the main account. ladybruin = wolfbook

https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showp...

This was a less extreme version of the mongidig/Elway charade.

That is just an awesome discovery. LOL

It is hilarious to go back, read the ladybruin post, then seeing her show up with an alt account to agree with herself that Rococo's posting has gone downhill.

Mongidig/Elway gets brutalized on here for multi accounting, but ladybruin bringing out an alt account to agree with herself that a poster is shitty is good stuff as well.


by Bored5000

That is just an awesome discovery. LOL

It is hilarious to go back, read the ladybruin post, then seeing her show up with an alt account to agree with herself that Rococo's posting has gone downhill.

Mongidig/Elway gets brutalized on here for multi accounting, but ladybruin bringing out an alt account to agree with herself that a poster is shitty is good stuff as well.

Now that this is a de facto unmoderated forum, such things are to be expected.


The thing is, the multi-accounts always end up being outed sooner or later and become the objects of ridicule, so the self-policing works, not perfectly but fairly well.


not me I've been undercover as brian james this whole time I'm just really good at covering my tracks


by Gorgonian

not me I've been undercover as brian james this whole time I'm just really good at covering my tracks

That accusation was utterly hysterical. I forgot who made that allegation, though.

Almost as hysterical as Victor continually calling you a pro-Zionist Genocidist for quoting from the ADL website exactly once.


I never should have admitted that I'm Lagtight. I mean, no chance anyone would have figured it without my confession.


by geezerchess

That accusation was utterly hysterical. I forgot who made that allegation, though.

Almost as hysterical as Victor continually calling you a pro-Zionist Genocidist for quoting from the ADL website exactly once.

It was rickroll. Par for him, honestly.


by Gorgonian

It was rickroll. Par for him, honestly.

Oh yeah, I remember now. Thanks.


Here's the Dems new leader! You go girl!



Do we want to pull out the JD Vance pics again?


by pokerfan655

Here's the Dems new leader! You go girl!

Aside from making fun of her looks, what do you have to offer with respect to a critique of her political views and/or her ability to be an able Senator?

I'm guessing you neither know nor care what her views are.


by geezerchess

Aside from making fun of her looks, what do you have to offer with respect to a critique of her political views and/or her ability to be an able Senator?

I'm guessing you neither know nor care what her views are.

Clips I saw there is no talk of her policies just she is fed up and angry .


by lozen

Clips I saw there is no talk of her policies just she is fed up and angry .

The standard deep dive from lozen, really digging into the truth of things.


by whatthejish

The standard deep dive from lozen, really digging into the truth of things.

Well it's all they seem to show . Good on her for running and if you know if her policies feel free to share them
I'm sure the Republicans hope she wins


by lozen

Well it's all they seem to show .

Who is they and why do you put a space before punctuations?


by geezerchess

Aside from making fun of her looks, what do you have to offer with respect to a critique of her political views and/or her ability to be an able Senator?

I'm guessing you neither know nor care what her views are.

He/she is braindead - did you not see her response when questioned why she should run? My guess is you yourself have not watched the video with it speaking yet makes such a stupid comment.


by pokerfan655

He/she is braindead - did you not see her response when questioned why she should run? My guess is you yourself have not watched the video with it speaking yet makes such a stupid comment.

Are you under the impression that you posted a video and not a still image?


by whatthejish

The standard deep dive from lozen, really digging into the truth of things.

What deep dive is there to do? You just love to argue for the sake of arguing - quite pathetic.


by whatthejish

Are you under the impression that you posted a video and not a still image?

Google the video you ******


by pokerfan655

What deep dive is there to do? You just love to argue for the sake of arguing - quite pathetic.

And you just love to spew hate. Which is worse?

by pokerfan655

Google the video you ******

JUST LOOK IT UP!!!


by whatthejish

Who is they and why do you put a space before punctuations?

Fox Morning
Hannity
Laura Ingram Show
Jesse Waters Show
Greg Gutfield show
The Five
Meghan Kelly show
Tucker Carlson Podcast
News Nation
Every right wing IG profile

My grammar is horrible as I am a uneducated conservative .


by lozen

Fox Morning
Hannity
Laura Ingram Show
Jesse Waters Show
Greg Gutfield show
The Five
Meghan Kelly show
Tucker Carlson Podcast
News Nation
Every right wing IG profile

My grammar is horrible as I am a uneducated conservative .

I see a pattern .


by pokerfan655

He/she is braindead - did you not see her response when questioned why she should run? My guess is you yourself have not watched the video with it speaking yet makes such a stupid comment.

And your guess is wrong. I watched a video clip prior to ever seeing your screenshot. Your original post exhibited zero evidence that you had even watched any footage of her debate.

As an aside, if you don't know how to post a video, I'd be thrilled and delighted to show you how!

addendum: I agree with your 'sh/e is braindead' observation.


I’ll admit I didn’t look into this person.

They are one of eight candidates trying to replace Platner and have absolutely no chance of winning.

Thanks for wasting my time, poker podophile


by geezerchess

And your guess is wrong. I watched a video clip prior to ever seeing your screenshot. Your original post exhibited zero evidence that you had even watched any footage of her debate.

As an aside, if you don't know how to post a video, I'd be thrilled and delighted to show you how!

addendum: I agree with your 'sh/e is braindead' observation.

So if you agree it's braindead why are you asking me to critique its views? I watched a 1 min video of it being asked what qualified it to run for Senate - why would I waste my time watching a debate? Your original comment to my post is invalid but like everyone else I know you like arguing to argue.

Reply...